{"title":"Meeting the Chimera: How the cedaw Can Address Digital Discrimination","authors":"T. Krupiy","doi":"10.1163/22131035-01001006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe article analyses what is distinct about the manner in which the delegation of the decision-making task to an artificial intelligence system produces harm from the standpoint of the prohibition of discrimination. It explores the manner in which the context of digital discrimination challenges the application of the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (cedaw). The article suggests how the subject matter of cedaw may be rethought to enable it to respond to digital discrimination. It formulates a legal test which can be added to the existing toolbox without the need to amend the treaty. The article offers approaches to interpreting cedaw teleologically in order to enable it to remain relevant in the face of technological innovation.","PeriodicalId":13730,"journal":{"name":"International Human Rights Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Human Rights Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-01001006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article analyses what is distinct about the manner in which the delegation of the decision-making task to an artificial intelligence system produces harm from the standpoint of the prohibition of discrimination. It explores the manner in which the context of digital discrimination challenges the application of the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (cedaw). The article suggests how the subject matter of cedaw may be rethought to enable it to respond to digital discrimination. It formulates a legal test which can be added to the existing toolbox without the need to amend the treaty. The article offers approaches to interpreting cedaw teleologically in order to enable it to remain relevant in the face of technological innovation.
期刊介绍：
The International Human Rights Law Review (HRLR) is a bi-annual peer-reviewed journal. It aims to stimulate research and thinking on contemporary human rights issues, problems, challenges and policies. It is particularly interested in soliciting papers, whether in the legal domain or other social sciences, that are unique in their approach and which seek to address poignant concerns of our times. One of the principal aims of the Journal is to provide an outlet to human rights scholars, practitioners and activists in the developing world who have something tangible to say about their experiences on the ground, or in order to discuss cases and practices that are generally inaccessible to European and NorthAmerican audiences. The Editors and the publisher will work hands-on with such contributors to help find solutions where necessary to facilitate translation or language editing in respect of accepted articles. The Journal is aimed at academics, students, government officials, human rights practitioners, and lawyers working in the area, as well as individuals and organisations interested in the area of human rights law. The Journal publishes critical articles that consider human rights law, policy and practice in their various contexts, at global, regional, sub-regional and national levels, book reviews, and a section focused on an up-to-date appraisal of important jurisprudence and practice of the UN and regional human rights systems including those in the developing world.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
