Income and democracy: a semiparametric approach

IF 0.8 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Econometric Reviews Pub Date : 2022-07-25 DOI:10.1080/07474938.2022.2091360
Shunan Zhao, Yiguo Sun, S. Kumbhakar
{"title":"Income and democracy: a semiparametric approach","authors":"Shunan Zhao, Yiguo Sun, S. Kumbhakar","doi":"10.1080/07474938.2022.2091360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We examine heterogeneous nonlinear effects of income on democracy using country-level data from 1960 to 2000. Existing studies mainly focused on a linear relationship or restricted nonlinear ones and find mixed findings about the effects of income on democracy. The strong positive cross-country correlation between income and democracy is often found to disappear after controlling country specific fixed effects, although the result varies with different estimation methods and samples. In contrast to previous studies, we apply a flexible semiparametric additive partially linear dynamic panel data model to explore the heterogeneous effects of income on democracy. We assume income is endogenous and it enters in the regression model nonparametrically. Our model specification also allows for different democracy equilibria and adjustment speeds toward equilibria. We propose a nonlinearity test for our model and a penalized sieve minimum distance estimator to solve the ill-posed inverse problem in the semiparametric instrumental variable estimator. The finite sample performance of the proposed test and estimator are evaluated by simulations. In the empirical model, we find that the relationship between income and democracy is nonlinear and it is more complex than a simple inverted U-shape. Specifically, depending on the choice of the democracy measure, income may have positive effects on democracy for low-income countries, negative effects for middle-income countries, and no effects for high-income countries.","PeriodicalId":11438,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Reviews","volume":"41 1","pages":"1113 - 1140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2022.2091360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract We examine heterogeneous nonlinear effects of income on democracy using country-level data from 1960 to 2000. Existing studies mainly focused on a linear relationship or restricted nonlinear ones and find mixed findings about the effects of income on democracy. The strong positive cross-country correlation between income and democracy is often found to disappear after controlling country specific fixed effects, although the result varies with different estimation methods and samples. In contrast to previous studies, we apply a flexible semiparametric additive partially linear dynamic panel data model to explore the heterogeneous effects of income on democracy. We assume income is endogenous and it enters in the regression model nonparametrically. Our model specification also allows for different democracy equilibria and adjustment speeds toward equilibria. We propose a nonlinearity test for our model and a penalized sieve minimum distance estimator to solve the ill-posed inverse problem in the semiparametric instrumental variable estimator. The finite sample performance of the proposed test and estimator are evaluated by simulations. In the empirical model, we find that the relationship between income and democracy is nonlinear and it is more complex than a simple inverted U-shape. Specifically, depending on the choice of the democracy measure, income may have positive effects on democracy for low-income countries, negative effects for middle-income countries, and no effects for high-income countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
收入与民主:一种半参数方法
本文利用1960年至2000年的国家级数据,研究了收入对民主的异质性非线性影响。现有的研究主要集中在线性关系或有限的非线性关系上,关于收入对民主的影响,研究结果喜忧参半。在控制了特定国家的固定效应后,人们往往发现收入与民主之间强烈的跨国正相关关系消失了,尽管不同的估计方法和样本会产生不同的结果。与以往的研究相比,我们采用了一种灵活的半参数可加性部分线性动态面板数据模型来探索收入对民主的异质性影响。我们假设收入是内生的,它是非参数地进入回归模型。我们的模型规范也允许不同的民主均衡和平衡的调整速度。我们提出了模型的非线性检验和惩罚筛最小距离估计来解决半参数工具变量估计中的不适定逆问题。通过仿真对所提出的测试和估计器的有限样本性能进行了评价。在实证模型中,我们发现收入与民主之间的关系是非线性的,它比简单的倒u型关系更为复杂。具体来说,根据民主衡量标准的选择,收入可能对低收入国家的民主产生积极影响,对中等收入国家的民主产生消极影响,对高收入国家的民主没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Econometric Reviews
Econometric Reviews 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Econometric Reviews is widely regarded as one of the top 5 core journals in econometrics. It probes the limits of econometric knowledge, featuring regular, state-of-the-art single blind refereed articles and book reviews. ER has been consistently the leader and innovator in its acclaimed retrospective and critical surveys and interchanges on current or developing topics. Special issues of the journal are developed by a world-renowned editorial board. These bring together leading experts from econometrics and beyond. Reviews of books and software are also within the scope of the journal. Its content is expressly intended to reach beyond econometrics and advanced empirical economics, to statistics and other social sciences.
期刊最新文献
Estimation of random functions proxying for unobservables Bootstrap inference on a factor model based average treatment effects estimator Using machine learning for efficient flexible regression adjustment in economic experiments Lag order selection for long-run variance estimation in econometrics Selecting the number of factors in approximate factor models using group variable regularization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1