Predicting the Water Balance from Optimization of Plant Productivity

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences GSA Today Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.1130/gsatg471gw.1
A. Hunt, B. Faybishenko, B. Ghanbarian
{"title":"Predicting the Water Balance from Optimization of Plant Productivity","authors":"A. Hunt, B. Faybishenko, B. Ghanbarian","doi":"10.1130/gsatg471gw.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How soil-water flows and how fast it moves solutes are important for plant growth and soil formation. The relationship describing the partitioning of precipitation, P, into run-off, Q, and evapotranspiration, ET, is called the water balance. Q incorporates both surface runoff and subsurface flow components, the latter chiefly contributing to soil formation. At shorter time intervals, soil-water storage, S, may change, dS/dt, due to atmosphere-soil water exchange; i.e., infiltrating and evaporating water and root uptake. Over sufficiently long time periods, storage changes are typically neglected (Gentine et al., 2012). Percolation theory from statistical physics provides a powerful tool for predicting soil formation and plant growth (Hunt, 2017) by means of modeling soil pore space as networks, rather than continua. In heterogeneous soils, solute migration typically exhibits non-Gaussian behavior, with statistical models having long tails in arrival time distributions and velocities decreasing over time. Theoretical prediction of solute transport via percolation theory that generates accurate full non-Gaussian arrival time distributions has become possible only recently (Hunt and Ghanbarian, 2016; Hunt and Sahimi, 2017). A unified framework, based on solute transport theory, helps predict soil depth as a function of age and infiltration rate (Yu and Hunt, 2017), soil erosion rates (Yu et al., 2019), chemical weathering (Yu and Hunt, 2018), and plant height and productivity as a function of time and transpiration rates (Hunt, 2017). Expressing soil depth and plant growth inputs to the crop net primary productivity, NPP, permits optimization of NPP with respect to the hydrologic fluxes (Hunt et al., 2020). Some remarkable conclusions also arise from this theory, such as that globally averaged ET is almost twice Q, and that the topology of the network guiding soil-water flow provides limitations on solute transport and chemical weathering. Both plant roots and infiltrating water tend to follow paths of least resistance, but with differing connectivity properties. Except in arid climates (Yang et al., 2016), roots tend to be restricted to the thin topsoil, so lateral root distributions are often considered twodimensional (2D), and root structures employ hierarchical, directional organization, speeding transport by avoiding closed loops. In contrast, infiltrating water (i.e., the subsurface part of Q) tends to follow random paths (Hunt, 2017) and percolates through the topsoil more deeply, giving rise to three-dimensional (3D) flow-path structures. The resulting distinct topologies generate differing nonlinear scaling, which is fractal, between time and distance of solute transport. On a bi-logarithmic space-time plot (Hunt, 2017), optimal paths for the different spatiotemporal scaling laws of root radial extent (RRE) and soil depth, z, are defined by their radial divergence from the same length and time positions. RRE relates to NPP, which is a key determinant of crop productivity, through root fractal dimensionality, df , given by RRE NPP df 1/ ∝ , with predicted values of df of 1.9 and 2.5 for 2D and 3D patterns, respectively (Hunt and Sahimi, 2017). Basic length/time scales are given by the fundamental network size (determined from the soil particle size distribution) and its ratio to mean soil-water flow rate. Yearly average pore-scale flow rates are determined from climate variables (Yu and Hunt, 2017). Each scaling relationship has a spread, representing chiefly the range of flow rates as controlled by P and its partitioning into ET and Q. This conceptual basis makes possible prediction of the dependence of NPP on the hydrologic fluxes, Q (which modulates the soil and root depths), and evapotranspiration, given by ET = P − Q (which modulates RRE). Consider the steady-state soil depth (Yu and","PeriodicalId":35784,"journal":{"name":"GSA Today","volume":"30 1","pages":"28-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GSA Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/gsatg471gw.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

How soil-water flows and how fast it moves solutes are important for plant growth and soil formation. The relationship describing the partitioning of precipitation, P, into run-off, Q, and evapotranspiration, ET, is called the water balance. Q incorporates both surface runoff and subsurface flow components, the latter chiefly contributing to soil formation. At shorter time intervals, soil-water storage, S, may change, dS/dt, due to atmosphere-soil water exchange; i.e., infiltrating and evaporating water and root uptake. Over sufficiently long time periods, storage changes are typically neglected (Gentine et al., 2012). Percolation theory from statistical physics provides a powerful tool for predicting soil formation and plant growth (Hunt, 2017) by means of modeling soil pore space as networks, rather than continua. In heterogeneous soils, solute migration typically exhibits non-Gaussian behavior, with statistical models having long tails in arrival time distributions and velocities decreasing over time. Theoretical prediction of solute transport via percolation theory that generates accurate full non-Gaussian arrival time distributions has become possible only recently (Hunt and Ghanbarian, 2016; Hunt and Sahimi, 2017). A unified framework, based on solute transport theory, helps predict soil depth as a function of age and infiltration rate (Yu and Hunt, 2017), soil erosion rates (Yu et al., 2019), chemical weathering (Yu and Hunt, 2018), and plant height and productivity as a function of time and transpiration rates (Hunt, 2017). Expressing soil depth and plant growth inputs to the crop net primary productivity, NPP, permits optimization of NPP with respect to the hydrologic fluxes (Hunt et al., 2020). Some remarkable conclusions also arise from this theory, such as that globally averaged ET is almost twice Q, and that the topology of the network guiding soil-water flow provides limitations on solute transport and chemical weathering. Both plant roots and infiltrating water tend to follow paths of least resistance, but with differing connectivity properties. Except in arid climates (Yang et al., 2016), roots tend to be restricted to the thin topsoil, so lateral root distributions are often considered twodimensional (2D), and root structures employ hierarchical, directional organization, speeding transport by avoiding closed loops. In contrast, infiltrating water (i.e., the subsurface part of Q) tends to follow random paths (Hunt, 2017) and percolates through the topsoil more deeply, giving rise to three-dimensional (3D) flow-path structures. The resulting distinct topologies generate differing nonlinear scaling, which is fractal, between time and distance of solute transport. On a bi-logarithmic space-time plot (Hunt, 2017), optimal paths for the different spatiotemporal scaling laws of root radial extent (RRE) and soil depth, z, are defined by their radial divergence from the same length and time positions. RRE relates to NPP, which is a key determinant of crop productivity, through root fractal dimensionality, df , given by RRE NPP df 1/ ∝ , with predicted values of df of 1.9 and 2.5 for 2D and 3D patterns, respectively (Hunt and Sahimi, 2017). Basic length/time scales are given by the fundamental network size (determined from the soil particle size distribution) and its ratio to mean soil-water flow rate. Yearly average pore-scale flow rates are determined from climate variables (Yu and Hunt, 2017). Each scaling relationship has a spread, representing chiefly the range of flow rates as controlled by P and its partitioning into ET and Q. This conceptual basis makes possible prediction of the dependence of NPP on the hydrologic fluxes, Q (which modulates the soil and root depths), and evapotranspiration, given by ET = P − Q (which modulates RRE). Consider the steady-state soil depth (Yu and
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从植物生产力优化预测水分平衡
土壤水如何流动以及溶质移动的速度对植物生长和土壤形成很重要。描述降水P与径流Q和蒸散发ET之间分配的关系称为水平衡。Q包含地表径流和地下流成分,后者主要有助于土壤的形成。在较短的时间间隔内,由于大气-土壤水分交换,土壤水储量S可能发生变化(dS/dt);即渗透和蒸发水分和根系吸收。在足够长的时间内,储存变化通常被忽略(genine et al., 2012)。统计物理学的渗透理论为预测土壤形成和植物生长提供了一个强大的工具(Hunt, 2017),方法是将土壤孔隙空间建模为网络,而不是连续的。在非均质土壤中,溶质迁移通常表现为非高斯迁移,统计模型在到达时间分布上具有长尾,速度随时间而减小。通过渗流理论对溶质输运进行理论预测,产生准确的全非高斯到达时间分布,直到最近才成为可能(Hunt和ghanbararian, 2016;Hunt and Sahimi, 2017)。基于溶质输运理论的统一框架有助于预测土壤深度作为年龄和入渗速率的函数(Yu and Hunt, 2017)、土壤侵蚀速率(Yu et al., 2019)、化学风化(Yu and Hunt, 2018),以及植物高度和生产力作为时间和蒸腾速率的函数(Hunt, 2017)。将土壤深度和植物生长投入表达为作物净初级生产力NPP,可以根据水文通量优化NPP (Hunt et al., 2020)。该理论还得出了一些值得注意的结论,例如全球平均ET几乎是Q的两倍,以及引导土壤-水流动的网络拓扑结构对溶质运输和化学风化提供了限制。植物根系和渗水都倾向于遵循阻力最小的路径,但具有不同的连通性。除干旱气候外(Yang et al., 2016),根系往往局限于薄的表土,因此横向根系分布通常被认为是二维的(2D),根系结构采用分层定向组织,通过避免闭环来加速运输。相比之下,入渗水(即Q的地下部分)往往遵循随机路径(Hunt, 2017),并在表土中渗透得更深,从而产生三维(3D)流道结构。由此产生的不同拓扑结构在溶质输运的时间和距离之间产生不同的非线性标度,这是分形的。在双对数时空图(Hunt, 2017)上,根径向延伸(RRE)和土壤深度(z)的不同时空尺度规律的最优路径由它们在相同长度和时间位置的径向发散来定义。RRE通过根分形维数df与NPP相关,NPP是作物生产力的关键决定因素,由RRE NPP df 1/∝给出,2D和3D模式的df预测值分别为1.9和2.5 (Hunt和Sahimi, 2017)。基本长度/时间尺度由基本网络尺寸(由土壤粒度分布确定)及其与平均土壤-水流速的比值给出。年平均孔隙尺度流量由气候变量确定(Yu和Hunt, 2017)。每个标度关系都有一个范围,主要代表由P控制的流量范围,并将其划分为ET和Q。这一概念基础可以预测NPP对水文通量Q(调节土壤和根深)和蒸散发(由ET = P−Q给出)的依赖(调节RRE)。考虑稳态土壤深度(Yu和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GSA Today
GSA Today Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Google Earth Engine Web Applications for Investigating and Teaching Fundamental Geoscience Concepts The Drakensberg Mountains: Southern Africa’s Barrier of Spears Retraversing the Highs and Lows of Cenozoic Sea Levels Facilitating the Critical Mineral Future: Valorization of Kaolin Mining Waste Through Partnerships Beast Quake (Taylor’s Version): Analysis of Seismic Signals Recorded during Two Taylor Swift Concerts in Seattle, July 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1