Enhanced Digitalisation and Competition Law Enforcement in Slovakia

M. Patakyová
{"title":"Enhanced Digitalisation and Competition Law Enforcement in Slovakia","authors":"M. Patakyová","doi":"10.2478/bjes-2021-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Digitalisation is a challenge from the regulatory point of view. Competition law, as a special type of regulation, is no exception to this. The article explores the risks of digitalisation, especially the ones related to the enhanced use of pricing algorithms. In theory, pricing algorithms are not easily assessed from the perspective of competition law, let alone its application in practice. The prohibition of anticompetitive agreements (pursuant to Article 101 of the Treaty on Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)) is applied with certain difficulty to agreements created by using pricing algorithms. This is an unfortunate situation, as horizontal agreements represent one of the worst infringements of EU competition law, including price cartels or bid rigging. Apart from presenting a theoretical background, the article dives into the practice of the Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic (AMO) in order to assess which practical issues the AMO might face when applying the theoretical concepts. In sum, the article asks from a theoretical perspective which issues of competition law have been introduced (or deepened) by the enhanced digitalisation, looking in particular to pricing algorithms. On top of that, the article explores the issues which may be encountered in practice, taking the Slovak jurisdiction as the example. The willingness and feasibility of the AMO to enforce digital issues such as pricing algorithms is assessed based on the previous acts of the AMO as well as the new Act on Protection of Competition, adopted by the Slovak parliament on 11 May 2021.","PeriodicalId":29836,"journal":{"name":"TalTech Journal of European Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"83 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TalTech Journal of European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Digitalisation is a challenge from the regulatory point of view. Competition law, as a special type of regulation, is no exception to this. The article explores the risks of digitalisation, especially the ones related to the enhanced use of pricing algorithms. In theory, pricing algorithms are not easily assessed from the perspective of competition law, let alone its application in practice. The prohibition of anticompetitive agreements (pursuant to Article 101 of the Treaty on Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)) is applied with certain difficulty to agreements created by using pricing algorithms. This is an unfortunate situation, as horizontal agreements represent one of the worst infringements of EU competition law, including price cartels or bid rigging. Apart from presenting a theoretical background, the article dives into the practice of the Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic (AMO) in order to assess which practical issues the AMO might face when applying the theoretical concepts. In sum, the article asks from a theoretical perspective which issues of competition law have been introduced (or deepened) by the enhanced digitalisation, looking in particular to pricing algorithms. On top of that, the article explores the issues which may be encountered in practice, taking the Slovak jurisdiction as the example. The willingness and feasibility of the AMO to enforce digital issues such as pricing algorithms is assessed based on the previous acts of the AMO as well as the new Act on Protection of Competition, adopted by the Slovak parliament on 11 May 2021.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯洛伐克加强数字化和竞争法执法
摘要从监管角度来看,数字化是一个挑战。竞争法作为一种特殊类型的法规,也不例外。本文探讨了数字化的风险,特别是与加强定价算法使用有关的风险。理论上,定价算法不容易从竞争法的角度进行评估,更不用说它在实践中的应用了。禁止反竞争协议(根据《欧洲联盟运作条约》第101条)在一定程度上适用于通过使用定价算法创建的协议。这是一种不幸的情况,因为横向协议是对欧盟竞争法最严重的违反之一,包括价格卡特尔或操纵投标。除了介绍理论背景外,文章还深入探讨了斯洛伐克共和国反垄断办公室(AMO)的实践,以评估AMO在应用理论概念时可能面临的实际问题。总之,本文从理论角度询问了哪些竞争法问题因数字化的增强而引入(或深化),尤其是定价算法。除此之外,本文以斯洛伐克管辖权为例,探讨了实践中可能遇到的问题。AMO执行定价算法等数字问题的意愿和可行性是根据AMO之前的法案以及斯洛伐克议会于2021年5月11日通过的新《竞争保护法》进行评估的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
62.50%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Threats to Diversity of Opinion and Freedom of Expression via Social Media Selected Legal Issues in Online Adult Education: Compliance of Online Learning and Teaching Process with GDPR Evolution of the European Union Development Policy towards India Divorce at the Notary: Protection of Creditors’ Interests Evolution of the Digital Economy and Society Index in the European Union: Α Socioeconomic Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1