Prevalence and Factors Associated with Post-operative Strictures in Anorectal Malformations

Q3 Medicine Siriraj Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.33192/smj.v75i7.262816
R. Ruangtrakool, Thuphom Chodchoy
{"title":"Prevalence and Factors Associated with Post-operative Strictures in Anorectal Malformations","authors":"R. Ruangtrakool, Thuphom Chodchoy","doi":"10.33192/smj.v75i7.262816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Rectal strictures are a serious complication following operation for anorectal malformations (ARM). The purpose of this study was to determine the factors affecting rectal strictures following surgical treatments for ARM.\nMaterials and Methods: Retrospective chart reviews of 204 patients with ARM who underwent surgical treatment at Siriraj Hospital between January 2003 and December 2019 were carried out.\nResults: Overall, the prevalence of post-operative rectal stricture was 19.6% (40/204). The higher types of ARM had higher rectal stricture rates.  In low type ARM, the stricture rate following surgery for perineal fistula, vestibular fistula was 4.1% and 14.7%, respectively. Recto-bulbar urethral fistula and recto-prostatic urethral fistula had stricture rates of 19.2% and 26.7%, respectively, but in higher types, the stricture rates were above 70%. Complications such as wound infection, dehiscence, retraction, colonic necrosis and recurrent fistula all affected the post-operative stricture rate (p = 0.029, p = 0.01, p = 0.01, p = 0.042 and p = 0.002, respectively). The operation for low type ARM using local tissue flap, such as YV and cutback anoplasty, had low complications. More complicated operations were performed for higher type ARM. The higher the complication rate, the higher the post-operative rectal stricture. Routine rectal dilatation by parents seemed to prevent rectal strictures (p = 0.056). The surgical treatments for rectal strictures composed of 57.5% anoplasty, 17.5% PSARP, 15% abdo-assisted pull-through and 10% abdo-assisted PSARP.\nConclusion: Post-operative rectal stricture occurred because of complications following complicated operations for high type ARM. A meticulous operative technique is crucial.","PeriodicalId":37270,"journal":{"name":"Siriraj Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siriraj Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i7.262816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Rectal strictures are a serious complication following operation for anorectal malformations (ARM). The purpose of this study was to determine the factors affecting rectal strictures following surgical treatments for ARM. Materials and Methods: Retrospective chart reviews of 204 patients with ARM who underwent surgical treatment at Siriraj Hospital between January 2003 and December 2019 were carried out. Results: Overall, the prevalence of post-operative rectal stricture was 19.6% (40/204). The higher types of ARM had higher rectal stricture rates.  In low type ARM, the stricture rate following surgery for perineal fistula, vestibular fistula was 4.1% and 14.7%, respectively. Recto-bulbar urethral fistula and recto-prostatic urethral fistula had stricture rates of 19.2% and 26.7%, respectively, but in higher types, the stricture rates were above 70%. Complications such as wound infection, dehiscence, retraction, colonic necrosis and recurrent fistula all affected the post-operative stricture rate (p = 0.029, p = 0.01, p = 0.01, p = 0.042 and p = 0.002, respectively). The operation for low type ARM using local tissue flap, such as YV and cutback anoplasty, had low complications. More complicated operations were performed for higher type ARM. The higher the complication rate, the higher the post-operative rectal stricture. Routine rectal dilatation by parents seemed to prevent rectal strictures (p = 0.056). The surgical treatments for rectal strictures composed of 57.5% anoplasty, 17.5% PSARP, 15% abdo-assisted pull-through and 10% abdo-assisted PSARP. Conclusion: Post-operative rectal stricture occurred because of complications following complicated operations for high type ARM. A meticulous operative technique is crucial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肛门直肠畸形术后狭窄的患病率及相关因素
目的:直肠狭窄是肛门直肠畸形术后的一个严重并发症。本研究的目的是确定影响ARM手术治疗后直肠狭窄的因素。材料和方法:对2003年1月至2019年12月在Siriraj医院接受手术治疗的204名ARM患者进行回顾性图表审查。结果:总的来说,术后直肠狭窄的发生率为19.6%(40/204)。ARM类型越高,直肠狭窄发生率越高。在低型ARM中,会阴瘘、前庭瘘术后狭窄率分别为4.1%和14.7%。直肠球尿道瘘和直肠前列腺尿道瘘的狭窄率分别为19.2%和26.7%,但在较高类型中,狭窄率超过70%。伤口感染、裂开、回缩、结肠坏死和复发性瘘等并发症均影响术后狭窄率(分别为p=0.029、p=0.01、p=0.042和p=0.002)。应用局部组织瓣如YV和切口肛门成形术治疗低型ARM并发症少。对更高类型的ARM执行了更复杂的操作。并发症发生率越高,术后直肠狭窄程度越高。父母的常规直肠扩张似乎可以预防直肠狭窄(p=0.056)。直肠狭窄的手术治疗包括57.5%的肛门成形术、17.5%的PSARP、15%的腹部辅助牵引和10%的腹部辅助PSARP。细致的操作技巧至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Siriraj Medical Journal
Siriraj Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Incidences, Characteristics, Management and Outcomes of Different Subtypes of Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study Optimizing Perioperative Care for Elderly Surgical Patients: A Review of Strategies and Evidence-Based Practices Comparison between the Standard Teaching and the Thai Version of Blended Teaching on Basic Airway Management in Siriraj Medical Students Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) and Outcomes in Preoperative Fast-track Geriatric Patients with Hip Fracture: A Single-center Retrospective Study Effectiveness of Smartphone Applications vs Conventional Care in Warfarin Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Time in the Therapeutic Range
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1