Piano Works of Transcarpathian Composers of the 20th and early 21st Centuries: The Phenomenon Research Algorithms

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Studia Musicologica Pub Date : 2023-05-05 DOI:10.1556/6.2022.00005
Marija Yarko, M. Borysenko, L. Buchok, Maria Karalius
{"title":"Piano Works of Transcarpathian Composers of the 20th and early 21st Centuries: The Phenomenon Research Algorithms","authors":"Marija Yarko, M. Borysenko, L. Buchok, Maria Karalius","doi":"10.1556/6.2022.00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to study the continuity of musical thinking professionalization on examples of piano works by Transcarpathian composers, which are very significant for the formation of the Transcarpathian compositional tradition as a historical phenomenon of mastery development by Transcarpathian composers (Zsigmond Lengyel, Dezső Zádor, István Márton, Emil Kobulei, Mykola Popenko, Volodymir Volontyr, Anatoly Zatin, Viktor Telychko) regarding their compliance with the academic norms of musical thinking and with historically composed stylistic invariants. The approach to the research phenomenon is monadological, which means the intention to diagnose a mentally peculiar discourse of the stylistic design, combining the assimilation of historically relevant thought forms and the intonational stock of a multiethnic folklore of the Transcarpathian region. We come to the conclusion that the piano works of Transcarpathian composers reflect a historically determined manoeuvre of “catching up” with the stylistic initiatives of the whole twentieth century with its idea of a global cultural synthesis and reinterpretation/neo-restoration of traditions. It has been found that the starting point for the professionalization of music composition in Transcarpathia was the modern modality of style – a position that is usually characterized as a “post-Romantic reaction” to all the traditional and total renewal of musical thinking in order to innovate. At the same time, for the style-forming initiatives of Transcarpathian composers the discourse of stylization became most relevant – a special type of musical thinking that created the newest representation of the “intonation image of the world” and found its rather original embodiment in the postmodern phase under the guise of “intellectual performance.”","PeriodicalId":34943,"journal":{"name":"Studia Musicologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Musicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/6.2022.00005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to study the continuity of musical thinking professionalization on examples of piano works by Transcarpathian composers, which are very significant for the formation of the Transcarpathian compositional tradition as a historical phenomenon of mastery development by Transcarpathian composers (Zsigmond Lengyel, Dezső Zádor, István Márton, Emil Kobulei, Mykola Popenko, Volodymir Volontyr, Anatoly Zatin, Viktor Telychko) regarding their compliance with the academic norms of musical thinking and with historically composed stylistic invariants. The approach to the research phenomenon is monadological, which means the intention to diagnose a mentally peculiar discourse of the stylistic design, combining the assimilation of historically relevant thought forms and the intonational stock of a multiethnic folklore of the Transcarpathian region. We come to the conclusion that the piano works of Transcarpathian composers reflect a historically determined manoeuvre of “catching up” with the stylistic initiatives of the whole twentieth century with its idea of a global cultural synthesis and reinterpretation/neo-restoration of traditions. It has been found that the starting point for the professionalization of music composition in Transcarpathia was the modern modality of style – a position that is usually characterized as a “post-Romantic reaction” to all the traditional and total renewal of musical thinking in order to innovate. At the same time, for the style-forming initiatives of Transcarpathian composers the discourse of stylization became most relevant – a special type of musical thinking that created the newest representation of the “intonation image of the world” and found its rather original embodiment in the postmodern phase under the guise of “intellectual performance.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
20世纪和21世纪初喀尔巴阡外作曲家的钢琴作品:现象研究算法
本文旨在以跨喀尔巴阡作曲家的钢琴作品为例,研究音乐思维专业化的连续性,作为跨喀尔巴阡作曲家(Zsigmond Lengyel, dezskov Zádor, István Márton, Emil Kobulei, Mykola Popenko, Volodymir Volontyr, Anatoly Zatin,Viktor Telychko)关于他们是否符合音乐思维的学术规范和历史上作曲的风格不变。研究这一现象的方法是一元论的,这意味着意图诊断一种精神上独特的话语的风格设计,结合同化历史相关的思想形式和跨喀尔巴阡地区多民族民间传说的语调。我们得出的结论是,喀尔巴阡山脉外作曲家的钢琴作品反映了一种历史上确定的策略,即“赶上”整个20世纪的风格倡议,其理念是全球文化综合和重新诠释/新恢复传统。人们发现,跨喀尔巴阡山脉音乐创作专业化的起点是风格的现代形态——这一立场通常被描述为对所有传统和音乐思维的全面更新的“后浪漫主义反应”,以实现创新。与此同时,对于跨喀尔巴阡作曲家的风格形成倡议,风格化的话语变得最相关-一种特殊类型的音乐思维,创造了“世界音阶形象”的最新表现,并在“智力表演”的伪装下在后现代阶段找到了其相当原始的体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Musicologica
Studia Musicologica Arts and Humanities-Music
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
For the Honorary Doctorate of Sir John Eliot Gardiner “Some Sort of Machine without a Body” “Breughelland”: Subverting the Antinomy of Utopia and Dystopia The Hybrid Musical Landscape of Ligeti's Late Concertos “Die Natur ist hier … zu Musik geworden”: György Ligeti and (Musical) Nature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1