Green Politics, Expertise, and Democratic Discourse in the Two Germanies, 1989–2019

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES GERMAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.3167/gps.2019.370402
C. Hager
{"title":"Green Politics, Expertise, and Democratic Discourse in the Two Germanies, 1989–2019","authors":"C. Hager","doi":"10.3167/gps.2019.370402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental movements became a major vehicle for promoting citizen participation in both East and West Germany during the 1980s. Their critiques of industrial society, however, reflected the different constellations of power in their respective countries. Movements in both East and West formed green parties, but their disparate understandings of power, expertise, and democracy complicated the parties’ efforts to coalesce during the unification process and to play a major role in German politics after unification. I propose that the persistence of this East-West divide helps explain the continuing discrepancy in the appeal of Alliance 90/The Greens in the old and new German federal states. Nevertheless, I also suggest that the Greens have accomplished their goal of opening technical issue areas—particularly energy—to political debate. This is currently working to enhance their image throughout Germany as champions of technological innovation and democratic openness in the face of climate inaction and right-wing populism.","PeriodicalId":44521,"journal":{"name":"GERMAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/gps.2019.370402","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERMAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/gps.2019.370402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Environmental movements became a major vehicle for promoting citizen participation in both East and West Germany during the 1980s. Their critiques of industrial society, however, reflected the different constellations of power in their respective countries. Movements in both East and West formed green parties, but their disparate understandings of power, expertise, and democracy complicated the parties’ efforts to coalesce during the unification process and to play a major role in German politics after unification. I propose that the persistence of this East-West divide helps explain the continuing discrepancy in the appeal of Alliance 90/The Greens in the old and new German federal states. Nevertheless, I also suggest that the Greens have accomplished their goal of opening technical issue areas—particularly energy—to political debate. This is currently working to enhance their image throughout Germany as champions of technological innovation and democratic openness in the face of climate inaction and right-wing populism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1989-2019年两个德国的绿色政治、专业知识和民主话语
20世纪80年代,环境运动成为促进东德和西德公民参与的主要工具。然而,他们对工业社会的批评反映了各自国家不同的权力格局。东西方的运动都形成了绿党,但他们对权力、专业知识和民主的不同理解使这些政党在统一过程中团结起来,并在统一后的德国政治中发挥重要作用的努力变得复杂。我认为,这种东西方分歧的持续存在有助于解释90联盟/绿党在德国新旧联邦州的吸引力持续存在差异。尽管如此,我也建议绿党已经实现了向政治辩论开放技术问题领域——尤其是能源领域的目标。目前,面对气候不作为和右翼民粹主义,这正致力于提升他们在德国各地作为技术创新和民主开放倡导者的形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
In Government and Scientists We Trust Does the Immigration Issue Divide German Attitudes toward Social Welfare? Hitler's American Countermodel Questioned Nationalism Obituary: Peter Pulzer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1