Estimated Levator Ani Subtended Volume: A Predictive Biomarker for Surgical Outcomes Following Native Tissue Apical Repair

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001142
A. Wyman, J. Salemi, S. Lai-Yuen, K. Greene, R. Bassaly, R. Kedar, L. Hoyte
{"title":"Estimated Levator Ani Subtended Volume: A Predictive Biomarker for Surgical Outcomes Following Native Tissue Apical Repair","authors":"A. Wyman, J. Salemi, S. Lai-Yuen, K. Greene, R. Bassaly, R. Kedar, L. Hoyte","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical utility of estimated levator ani subtended volume (eLASV) as a prospective preoperative biomarker for prediction of surgical outcomes. Study Design This is a prospective case-control pilot study. Patients were recruited and gave consent between January 2018 and December 2020. Surgical failure was defined by composite score. The eLASV was calculated for each patient based on a previously published algorithm. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact test, log-binomial regression, area under a receiver operating characteristics, Bland-Altman plot, Lin coefficient, and κ coefficient were all performed for analysis. Results Fifty-one patients gave consent, 31 completed preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, 27 underwent surgery (uterosacral ligament suspension), and 19 followed up for 1-year examination. Five patients (26.3%) were defined as surgical failure with median eLASV volume of 57.0 (interquartile range, 50.1–66.2). Fourteen patients (73.7%) were defined as surgical success with median eLASV of 28.2 (interquartile range, 17.2–24.3). Eighty percent of the surgical failure group (4/5) had elevated volume of eLASV, where only 14.3% of the success group (2/14) had an elevated volume (P = 0.0173). No confounders were found and unadjusted log-binomial regression suggested that patients with a high eLASV were 8.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.2–61.9) times more likely to experience surgical failure compared with those with low eLASV. The c-statistic (area under a receiver operating characteristics) was high at 0.829 along with Lin concordance coefficient of 0.949 (95% confidence interval, 0.891–0.977) for continuous data between the 2 interrater observer teams. Conclusions In this small prospective pilot study, patients with elevated eLASV on a preoperative pelvic magnetic resonance imaging were associated with an increased risk for surgical failure at 1 year regardless of age, body mass index, stage, or parity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03534830","PeriodicalId":48831,"journal":{"name":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"28 1","pages":"385 - 390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical utility of estimated levator ani subtended volume (eLASV) as a prospective preoperative biomarker for prediction of surgical outcomes. Study Design This is a prospective case-control pilot study. Patients were recruited and gave consent between January 2018 and December 2020. Surgical failure was defined by composite score. The eLASV was calculated for each patient based on a previously published algorithm. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact test, log-binomial regression, area under a receiver operating characteristics, Bland-Altman plot, Lin coefficient, and κ coefficient were all performed for analysis. Results Fifty-one patients gave consent, 31 completed preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, 27 underwent surgery (uterosacral ligament suspension), and 19 followed up for 1-year examination. Five patients (26.3%) were defined as surgical failure with median eLASV volume of 57.0 (interquartile range, 50.1–66.2). Fourteen patients (73.7%) were defined as surgical success with median eLASV of 28.2 (interquartile range, 17.2–24.3). Eighty percent of the surgical failure group (4/5) had elevated volume of eLASV, where only 14.3% of the success group (2/14) had an elevated volume (P = 0.0173). No confounders were found and unadjusted log-binomial regression suggested that patients with a high eLASV were 8.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.2–61.9) times more likely to experience surgical failure compared with those with low eLASV. The c-statistic (area under a receiver operating characteristics) was high at 0.829 along with Lin concordance coefficient of 0.949 (95% confidence interval, 0.891–0.977) for continuous data between the 2 interrater observer teams. Conclusions In this small prospective pilot study, patients with elevated eLASV on a preoperative pelvic magnetic resonance imaging were associated with an increased risk for surgical failure at 1 year regardless of age, body mass index, stage, or parity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03534830
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估计Levator Ani亚终末体积:天然组织根尖修复后手术结果的预测性生物标志物
目的本研究的目的是探讨肛门提肌包夹容积(eLASV)作为预测手术结果的前瞻性术前生物标志物的临床实用性。研究设计这是一项前瞻性病例对照试验研究。在2018年1月至2020年12月期间招募患者并给予同意。手术失败由综合评分确定。eLASV是根据之前公布的算法为每位患者计算的。采用描述性统计、Fisher精确检验、对数二项回归、受试者操作特征下面积、Bland-Altman图、Lin系数和κ系数进行分析。结果51例患者表示同意,31例完成术前磁共振成像,27例接受手术(子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术),19例随访1年。5名患者(26.3%)被定义为手术失败,eLASV中位数为57.0(四分位间距,50.1–66.2),其中只有14.3%的成功组(2/14)的容量增加(P=0.0173)。没有发现混杂因素,未经调整的对数二项回归表明,与eLASV低的患者相比,eLASV高的患者发生手术失败的可能性高8.7倍(95%置信区间,1.2-61.9)。对于两个参与者间观察小组之间的连续数据,c统计量(受试者操作特征下的面积)高达0.829,Lin一致性系数为0.949(95%置信区间,0.891–0.977)。结论在这项小型前瞻性试点研究中,无论年龄、体重指数、分期或产次如何,术前盆腔磁共振成像中eLASV升高的患者在1岁时手术失败的风险增加。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03534830
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, official journal of the American Urogynecologic Society, is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to specialists, physicians and allied health professionals concerned with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders. The journal publishes original clinical research, basic science research, education, scientific advances, case reports, scientific reviews, editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
AUGS-PERFORM: A New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Quality of Prolapse Care. Factors Associated With a Positive Urine Culture in Women Seeking Urogynecologic Care for Urinary Tract Infection Symptoms. Complications Reported to the Food and Drug Administration: A Cross-sectional Comparison of Urogynecologic Meshes. The Role of Pessaries in the Treatment of Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Impact of Methenamine Hippurate Treatment on Urothelial Integrity and Bladder Inflammation in Aged Female Mice and Women With Urinary Tract Infections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1