The Structure of Collaboration Networks: An Illustration of Indian Economics

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Social Structure Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.21307/JOSS-2018-001
M. Krishna, G. Paul
{"title":"The Structure of Collaboration Networks: An Illustration of Indian Economics","authors":"M. Krishna, G. Paul","doi":"10.21307/JOSS-2018-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The main aim of this study is twofold: first, to examine the underlying structure of coauthorship in Indian economics; and second, to explore the link between the participation in scientific collaborations and academic visibility. We decipher the structure of co-authorship by presenting collaboration networks of scholars who published articles in six Indian economics journals during 1966-2005, which is split into four windows: 1966-75, 1976-85, 1986-95, and 1996-2005. In this study, the following social network measures are applied: the size of the network, the size of the main component, average degree, path length, and clustering coefficient. The study presents the following three features of Indian economics: first, a substantial proportion of Indian authors are isolated, albeit declining very slowly over a period of time; second, it appears that the structure of scholarly collaboration in Indian economics is highly fragmented, and the observed size of main components accounts for a small proportion of the total authors; third, and more importantly, the size and composition of co-authorship networks presented in the paper seldom impact the scientific visibility of authors.","PeriodicalId":35236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Structure","volume":"18 1","pages":"1 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Structure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/JOSS-2018-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The main aim of this study is twofold: first, to examine the underlying structure of coauthorship in Indian economics; and second, to explore the link between the participation in scientific collaborations and academic visibility. We decipher the structure of co-authorship by presenting collaboration networks of scholars who published articles in six Indian economics journals during 1966-2005, which is split into four windows: 1966-75, 1976-85, 1986-95, and 1996-2005. In this study, the following social network measures are applied: the size of the network, the size of the main component, average degree, path length, and clustering coefficient. The study presents the following three features of Indian economics: first, a substantial proportion of Indian authors are isolated, albeit declining very slowly over a period of time; second, it appears that the structure of scholarly collaboration in Indian economics is highly fragmented, and the observed size of main components accounts for a small proportion of the total authors; third, and more importantly, the size and composition of co-authorship networks presented in the paper seldom impact the scientific visibility of authors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合作网络的结构:印度经济学的一个例证
摘要本研究的主要目的有两个:第一,考察印度经济学中合著者的基本结构;第二,探讨参与科学合作与学术知名度之间的联系。我们通过展示1966-2005年间在六种印度经济学期刊上发表文章的学者的合作网络来解读合著者的结构,该网络分为四个窗口:1966-75、1976-85、1986-95和1996-2005。在本研究中,应用了以下社交网络度量:网络的大小、主要成分的大小、平均程度、路径长度和聚类系数。该研究呈现了印度经济学的以下三个特征:首先,相当大比例的印度作者是孤立的,尽管在一段时间内下降非常缓慢;其次,印度经济学的学术合作结构似乎高度分散,观察到的主要组成部分的规模在总作者中所占比例很小;第三,更重要的是,论文中提出的合作网络的规模和组成很少影响作者的科学可见性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Social Structure
Journal of Social Structure Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Living in Networks: The Dynamics of Social Relations A Network Analysis of Twitter's Crackdown on the QAnon Conversation An Analysis of Relations Among European Countries Based on UEFA European Football Championship Syndicate Women: Gender and Networks in Chicago Organized Crime Advances in Network Clustering and Blockmodeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1