BritNed v. ABB: lessons from the first follow-on damages claim to reach judgment in the English courts

Q4 Social Sciences Competition Law Journal Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI:10.4337/CLJ.2019.01.02
Lara Hall
{"title":"BritNed v. ABB: lessons from the first follow-on damages claim to reach judgment in the English courts","authors":"Lara Hall","doi":"10.4337/CLJ.2019.01.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The case of BritNed v. ABB is the first time a claim for damages following on from a competition authority's cartel infringement decision has proceeded through trial and to final judgment in the English courts. The judgment provides useful guidance on the approach the English courts may take to the quantification of damages in cartel damages cases. This article looks at the manner in which the judgment grappled with three key areas of evidential dispute in the case, which resulted in the court rejecting the claimant's economic case. The article also considers how the findings in the case may influence the manner in which competition damages claims are pursued in the future.","PeriodicalId":36415,"journal":{"name":"Competition Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/CLJ.2019.01.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The case of BritNed v. ABB is the first time a claim for damages following on from a competition authority's cartel infringement decision has proceeded through trial and to final judgment in the English courts. The judgment provides useful guidance on the approach the English courts may take to the quantification of damages in cartel damages cases. This article looks at the manner in which the judgment grappled with three key areas of evidential dispute in the case, which resulted in the court rejecting the claimant's economic case. The article also considers how the findings in the case may influence the manner in which competition damages claims are pursued in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BritNed诉ABB案:英国法院对第一次后续损害赔偿索赔作出判决的经验教训
BritNed诉ABB案是继竞争主管机构卡特尔侵权裁决之后,英国法院首次对损害赔偿进行审判并作出最终判决。该判决为英国法院在卡特尔损害赔偿案件中量化损害赔偿的方法提供了有用的指导。本文着眼于判决处理本案证据争议的三个关键领域的方式,这导致法院驳回了原告的经济案件。该条还考虑了本案的调查结果可能如何影响未来寻求竞争损害赔偿的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Competition Law Journal
Competition Law Journal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
If the Competition and Markets Authority were an emoji: merger clearance lessons from Meta/Giphy Economists on trial: how to make expert duties, meetings, and hot tubs work The UK and EU competition rules for research and development agreements: falling out of lockstep The assessment and communication of the benefits of competition interventions by the Competition and Markets Authority The risks of a form-based approach to exclusionary abuses of dominance – an economic perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1