Exhibit and Conference Reviews

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY Aspasia Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.3167/asp.2023.170112
Valentina Mitkova, Georgios Manios, Denisa Nečasová
{"title":"Exhibit and Conference Reviews","authors":"Valentina Mitkova, Georgios Manios, Denisa Nečasová","doi":"10.3167/asp.2023.170112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the establishment of women's history as an academic research and educational field in the 1960s–1970s in the Western context—a field contesting traditional historical narratives (political, diplomatic, institutional) that located women on the periphery of historical processes—efforts have concentrated on the discovery and analysis of neglected facts of the past, the historical representation of gender interdependence, and the reconstruction of a credible male–female sociohistorical reality. Since the 1990s, in the context of changed political, social, and cultural realities, interest in the problems of the “second sex,”1 its experiences and representations, and its role in historical events has intensified and gained greater public visibility in the east as well. Interpreted as a significant tool for drawing a comprehensive picture of women's past in Europe, scholarship on women's history in Eastern and Southeastern Europe has focused on various aspects of women's emancipation in the modern era, the relationships among power, gender, identity, modernization, nationalism, and national formation, women's role in the processes of cultural and civilizational construction, and their place in the context of traditionally established intellectual hierarchies. Conducting a productive dialogue between history and social anthropology, filling numerous gaps in historical memory (regarding traditionally marginalized social groups such as women), feminist studies in the region have produced collections of documents and primary sources, innovative publications, and monographs, all sharing the belief that women have their own history subject to complex analysis.","PeriodicalId":41373,"journal":{"name":"Aspasia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aspasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/asp.2023.170112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the establishment of women's history as an academic research and educational field in the 1960s–1970s in the Western context—a field contesting traditional historical narratives (political, diplomatic, institutional) that located women on the periphery of historical processes—efforts have concentrated on the discovery and analysis of neglected facts of the past, the historical representation of gender interdependence, and the reconstruction of a credible male–female sociohistorical reality. Since the 1990s, in the context of changed political, social, and cultural realities, interest in the problems of the “second sex,”1 its experiences and representations, and its role in historical events has intensified and gained greater public visibility in the east as well. Interpreted as a significant tool for drawing a comprehensive picture of women's past in Europe, scholarship on women's history in Eastern and Southeastern Europe has focused on various aspects of women's emancipation in the modern era, the relationships among power, gender, identity, modernization, nationalism, and national formation, women's role in the processes of cultural and civilizational construction, and their place in the context of traditionally established intellectual hierarchies. Conducting a productive dialogue between history and social anthropology, filling numerous gaps in historical memory (regarding traditionally marginalized social groups such as women), feminist studies in the region have produced collections of documents and primary sources, innovative publications, and monographs, all sharing the belief that women have their own history subject to complex analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
展览和会议评论
自20世纪60年代至70年代在西方背景下将女性历史作为一个学术研究和教育领域建立以来——这是一个与将女性置于历史进程边缘的传统历史叙事(政治、外交、制度)相竞争的领域——努力集中在发现和分析过去被忽视的事实、性别相互依存的历史表现、重建一个可信的男女社会历史现实。自20世纪90年代以来,在政治、社会和文化现实变化的背景下,对“第二性”问题、其经历和表现以及其在历史事件中的作用的兴趣也得到了加强,并在东方获得了更多的公众关注。东欧和东南欧的女性历史研究是全面了解欧洲女性历史的重要工具,关注现代女性解放的各个方面,权力、性别、身份、现代化、民族主义和国家形成之间的关系,女性在文化和文明建设过程中的作用,以及她们在传统知识阶层背景下的地位。在历史和社会人类学之间进行富有成效的对话,填补了历史记忆中的许多空白(关于传统上被边缘化的社会群体,如妇女),该地区的女权主义研究产生了大量的文献和原始资料,创新的出版物和专著,所有这些都相信妇女有自己的历史,需要进行复杂的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aspasia
Aspasia HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Authority, Authenticity, and the Epistemic Legacies of Cold War Area Studies Between Holy Church and Holy Human Rights The Social-Legal Rights and Political Activity of Albanian Women in the Late Middle Ages (Thirteenth–Fifteenth Centuries) Book Reviews There Is Always Something New to Discover
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1