The Way I See You. Implicit Followership Theories Explored Through the Lens of Attachment

IF 0.6 Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Psychologist-Manager Journal Pub Date : 2018-05-01 DOI:10.1037/mgr0000069
Per-Magnus Moe Thompson, Lars Glasø, S. B. Matthiesen
{"title":"The Way I See You. Implicit Followership Theories Explored Through the Lens of Attachment","authors":"Per-Magnus Moe Thompson, Lars Glasø, S. B. Matthiesen","doi":"10.1037/mgr0000069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building on Bowlby’s (1969/1982) attachment theory, the present study examines the relationship between leaders’ attachment style, mirroring their relational experiences with significant others, and implicit followership theories (IFTs). Drawing on the principle of schema transference, it was hypothesized that both anxious and avoidant attachment styles were related to negative IFTs. Furthermore, investigating the phenomenon of defensive projection, it was proposed that leaders’ perception of own competence level would moderate the relationship between avoidant style and the IFT facet “incompetence,” so that avoidant leaders feeling less competent at work would view followers as more incompetent than other avoidant leaders. Survey data were collected from 258 leaders in a variety of work settings. Hierarchical regression analyses supported both hypotheses. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":44734,"journal":{"name":"Psychologist-Manager Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologist-Manager Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Building on Bowlby’s (1969/1982) attachment theory, the present study examines the relationship between leaders’ attachment style, mirroring their relational experiences with significant others, and implicit followership theories (IFTs). Drawing on the principle of schema transference, it was hypothesized that both anxious and avoidant attachment styles were related to negative IFTs. Furthermore, investigating the phenomenon of defensive projection, it was proposed that leaders’ perception of own competence level would moderate the relationship between avoidant style and the IFT facet “incompetence,” so that avoidant leaders feeling less competent at work would view followers as more incompetent than other avoidant leaders. Survey data were collected from 258 leaders in a variety of work settings. Hierarchical regression analyses supported both hypotheses. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我看到你的方式。依恋视角下的内隐追随者理论探索
基于Bowlby(1969/1982)的依恋理论,本研究考察了领导者的依恋风格(反映他们与重要他人的关系经历)与内隐跟随理论(IFT)之间的关系。根据图式迁移的原理,假设焦虑依恋和回避型依恋都与负性IFT有关。此外,在调查防御投射现象时,有人提出,领导者对自身能力水平的感知会缓和回避型风格与IFT方面“无能”之间的关系,因此,感觉工作能力较差的回避型领导者会认为追随者比其他回避型领导者更无能。调查数据是从258名不同工作环境的领导者那里收集的。分层回归分析支持了这两种假设。讨论了对理论和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychologist-Manager Journal
Psychologist-Manager Journal PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leaders that don’t care: Investigating leader caregiving from an attachment-theoretical perspective. Value–task concordance as a predictor of job satisfaction and workplace engagement. Becoming an organizational leader: A different career path for psychologists. The road to gender equality: Persisting obstacles for American women in the workforce. The practice of management: The ascent of women as scholars and leaders in the field of zoo biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1