Evaluating the current state of realization of victims’ rights in the criminal process: An explanation under Ukrainian and Indian criminal procedure codes

IF 1 Q2 LAW Novum Jus Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.14718/novumjus.2022.16.2.2
S. Ablamskyi, Faiz Ayat Ansari, Andrii Volodymyrovych Nosach
{"title":"Evaluating the current state of realization of victims’ rights in the criminal process: An explanation under Ukrainian and Indian criminal procedure codes","authors":"S. Ablamskyi, Faiz Ayat Ansari, Andrii Volodymyrovych Nosach","doi":"10.14718/novumjus.2022.16.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Respecting and protecting all parties have always been the objective of every criminal proceeding, aiming to achieve justice at every stage of the criminal trial. This protection becomes of utmost importance when dealing with victims who have suffered injuries because of crime. For this reason, both India and Ukraine have given special protection to victims’ rights throughout the criminal process. This paper aims to analyze the role and degree of protection offered by these criminal procedure codes in respecting the rights of victims. Despite all the procedures put in place, the condition of the victim is still questionable, which has considerably affected the credibility of these countries’ criminal procedure codes. To determine whether they really ensure the respect of victims’ rights, a comparative methodology was used to establish the expectations of the two criminal law systems in this matter. The findings suggest that even though the criminal procedure codes of both countries have relevant provisions to protect the victims’ rights, their criminal procedure systems are still marred with issues regarding this aspect. Consequently, there is a need to revisit these codes to ensure that the rights of parties, especially those of the victims, are respected.","PeriodicalId":40163,"journal":{"name":"Novum Jus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novum Jus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14718/novumjus.2022.16.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Respecting and protecting all parties have always been the objective of every criminal proceeding, aiming to achieve justice at every stage of the criminal trial. This protection becomes of utmost importance when dealing with victims who have suffered injuries because of crime. For this reason, both India and Ukraine have given special protection to victims’ rights throughout the criminal process. This paper aims to analyze the role and degree of protection offered by these criminal procedure codes in respecting the rights of victims. Despite all the procedures put in place, the condition of the victim is still questionable, which has considerably affected the credibility of these countries’ criminal procedure codes. To determine whether they really ensure the respect of victims’ rights, a comparative methodology was used to establish the expectations of the two criminal law systems in this matter. The findings suggest that even though the criminal procedure codes of both countries have relevant provisions to protect the victims’ rights, their criminal procedure systems are still marred with issues regarding this aspect. Consequently, there is a need to revisit these codes to ensure that the rights of parties, especially those of the victims, are respected.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价在刑事程序中实现受害者权利的现状:根据乌克兰和印度刑事诉讼法的解释
尊重和保护各方当事人一直是每一项刑事诉讼的目标,力求在刑事审判的每一个阶段都实现公正。在处理因犯罪而受伤的受害者时,这种保护变得极为重要。为此,印度和乌克兰都在整个刑事诉讼过程中对受害者的权利给予了特别保护。本文旨在分析这些刑事诉讼法在尊重被害人权利方面的作用和保护程度。尽管采取了各种程序,但受害者的状况仍然令人怀疑,这大大影响了这些国家刑事诉讼法的可信度。为了确定它们是否真正确保尊重受害者的权利,采用了一种比较方法来确定两个刑法制度在这个问题上的期望。调查结果表明,尽管两国的刑事诉讼法都有保护受害者权利的相关规定,但两国的刑事诉讼制度仍然存在这方面的问题。因此,有必要重新审议这些守则,以确保各方的权利,特别是受害者的权利得到尊重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Novum Jus
Novum Jus LAW-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
85.70%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
El ascenso de los movimientos minoritarios de resistencia desde una perspectiva académica El derecho al territorio indígena: protección internacional y las reivindicaciones locales Puntos de acción desde la migración en el marco de la seguridad y defensa nacional El relativismo jurídico. Toma de decisiones por el operador judicial: entre verdad y justicia Constitucionalismo intersistémico, Constitución y derechos fundamentales: entre teoría constitucional y sociología jurídica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1