The Concept of Activity as the Basis of Research of L. S. Vygotsky’s School of Psychology

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q4 Arts and Humanities RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-07-04 DOI:10.1080/10611967.2021.2000312
V. Davydov
{"title":"The Concept of Activity as the Basis of Research of L. S. Vygotsky’s School of Psychology","authors":"V. Davydov","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2021.2000312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The author proves that, despite the opinion prevalent among historians of psychology, the concept of “practical, sensuous activity” was present in Vygotsky’s work from the very beginning of his studies; moreover, it determined their general direction. Following Marx, Vygotsky regarded the tool-based nature of human activity as its specific trait. Psychological activity is likewise mediated by means of tools of a special kind—the “verbal signs”; using these social tools, man masters his own behavior. Having been able to trace the origins of consciousness to practical activity, to “life,” Vygotsky did not go into the concrete specifics of this process and set about searching for the primeval source of consciousness in the “emotional sphere.” His disciple Alexey Leontiev resumed the study of the practical genesis of the psyche, having started a new stage in the development of the cultural–historical theory. In conclusion, the author of the article analyzes the weak points of today’s psychology of activity and points out the necessity of combining the activity-based and the sign–symbolic approaches in the science of man.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"59 1","pages":"290 - 302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.2000312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The author proves that, despite the opinion prevalent among historians of psychology, the concept of “practical, sensuous activity” was present in Vygotsky’s work from the very beginning of his studies; moreover, it determined their general direction. Following Marx, Vygotsky regarded the tool-based nature of human activity as its specific trait. Psychological activity is likewise mediated by means of tools of a special kind—the “verbal signs”; using these social tools, man masters his own behavior. Having been able to trace the origins of consciousness to practical activity, to “life,” Vygotsky did not go into the concrete specifics of this process and set about searching for the primeval source of consciousness in the “emotional sphere.” His disciple Alexey Leontiev resumed the study of the practical genesis of the psyche, having started a new stage in the development of the cultural–historical theory. In conclusion, the author of the article analyzes the weak points of today’s psychology of activity and points out the necessity of combining the activity-based and the sign–symbolic approaches in the science of man.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为维果茨基心理学派研究基础的活动概念
摘要:本文证明,尽管心理学史家普遍认为“实践的、感性的活动”这一概念从维果茨基的研究之初就存在于他的著作中;此外,它还决定了它们的大方向。继马克思之后,维果茨基将人类活动的工具性视为其特有的特征。心理活动同样是通过一种特殊的工具——“语言符号”来中介的;利用这些社会工具,人类掌握了自己的行为。维果茨基已经能够将意识的起源追溯到实践活动,追溯到“生活”,但他并没有深入到这一过程的具体细节中,而是开始在“情感领域”寻找意识的原始来源。他的弟子阿列克谢·列昂捷夫(Alexey Leontiev)恢复了对心灵实践起源的研究,开启了文化历史理论发展的新阶段。最后,分析了当今活动心理学的薄弱环节,指出了在人学研究中,将活动理论与符号-象征理论相结合的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Russian Studies in Philosophy publishes thematic issues featuring selected scholarly papers from conferences and joint research projects as well as from the leading Russian-language journals in philosophy. Thematic coverage ranges over significant theoretical topics as well as topics in the history of philosophy, both European and Russian, including issues focused on institutions, schools, and figures such as Bakhtin, Fedorov, Leontev, Losev, Rozanov, Solovev, and Zinovev.
期刊最新文献
Concluding Russian Studies in Philosophy: An Eye Towards the Future The Concept of Perfection in Lev Karsavin’s Religious Metaphysics Variants of Images of the Future in the Work of Lev P. Karsavin Lev Karsavin: Russian Religiosity and Russian Revolution The Metaphysical Path: Lev P. Karsavin’s Philosophical Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1