Evaluation of Self-Adhering Flowable Composites on Repeated Bracket Bonding Process: An In Vitro Study

IF 0.1 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Archives of Orofacial Science Pub Date : 2022-12-22 DOI:10.21315/aos2022.1702.oa03
A. Akbulut, Gokcen Sahin
{"title":"Evaluation of Self-Adhering Flowable Composites on Repeated Bracket Bonding Process: An In Vitro Study","authors":"A. Akbulut, Gokcen Sahin","doi":"10.21315/aos2022.1702.oa03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Duration of orthodontic treatment becomes major concern. The present study compared shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) values of different adhesive systems with different application methods on rebonding process of retrieved orthodontic brackets. Eighty premolar teeth were equally divided into five groups. Transbond XT (TXT) which belongs to total-etch system was used in Group 1 as the control group. Nova Compo-SF (NC) and Vertise Flow (VF) (Kerr Dental, Italy) which are self-adhering flowable composites were used in Group 2 (NC+etch) and Group 3 (VF+etch) respectively with additional etching before application. Group 4 (NC) and Group 5 (VF) were used by following instructions of each brand. The brackets were debonded with a bracket removing plier and rebonded with the same procedures after sandblasting of the bracket and surface cleaning of the enamel. SBS and ARI were measured for each sample. Comparison between all groups was performed by Kruskal-Wallis test and chisquare test. The highest SBS was observed in NC+etch (median = 11.44, mean = 13.49±9.42), followed by NC (median = 10.17, mean = 11.35±6.55), TXT (median = 6.36, mean = 8.06±6.33), VF+etch (median = 5.68, mean = 6.75±4.58), and VF (median = 2.62, mean = 2.92±2.57), respectively. ARI 1 was observed in 81.3% of TXT whereas 62.5% of NC+etch. ARI 1, 2, and 3 were equally distributed in VF+etch group (31.3%). ARI 5 was observed in 37.5% of NC and 62.5% of VF. Analyses referred to statistically significant differences between five groups regarding both SBS and ARI (p < 0.001). As NC showed the highest SBS on rebonding process, it can be a promising alternative to TXT which is the gold standard.","PeriodicalId":44961,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orofacial Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orofacial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/aos2022.1702.oa03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Duration of orthodontic treatment becomes major concern. The present study compared shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) values of different adhesive systems with different application methods on rebonding process of retrieved orthodontic brackets. Eighty premolar teeth were equally divided into five groups. Transbond XT (TXT) which belongs to total-etch system was used in Group 1 as the control group. Nova Compo-SF (NC) and Vertise Flow (VF) (Kerr Dental, Italy) which are self-adhering flowable composites were used in Group 2 (NC+etch) and Group 3 (VF+etch) respectively with additional etching before application. Group 4 (NC) and Group 5 (VF) were used by following instructions of each brand. The brackets were debonded with a bracket removing plier and rebonded with the same procedures after sandblasting of the bracket and surface cleaning of the enamel. SBS and ARI were measured for each sample. Comparison between all groups was performed by Kruskal-Wallis test and chisquare test. The highest SBS was observed in NC+etch (median = 11.44, mean = 13.49±9.42), followed by NC (median = 10.17, mean = 11.35±6.55), TXT (median = 6.36, mean = 8.06±6.33), VF+etch (median = 5.68, mean = 6.75±4.58), and VF (median = 2.62, mean = 2.92±2.57), respectively. ARI 1 was observed in 81.3% of TXT whereas 62.5% of NC+etch. ARI 1, 2, and 3 were equally distributed in VF+etch group (31.3%). ARI 5 was observed in 37.5% of NC and 62.5% of VF. Analyses referred to statistically significant differences between five groups regarding both SBS and ARI (p < 0.001). As NC showed the highest SBS on rebonding process, it can be a promising alternative to TXT which is the gold standard.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自粘性可流动复合材料在支架重复粘接过程中的评价:体外研究
正畸治疗的持续时间成为主要问题。本研究比较了不同粘接剂体系和不同应用方法在矫治牙槽再粘接过程中的剪切粘接强度(SBS)和粘接残余指数(ARI)值。80颗前磨牙平均分为5组。第1组采用全蚀刻体系的Transbond XT (TXT)作为对照组。Nova composite - sf (NC)和Vertise Flow (VF)(意大利Kerr Dental, Italy)为自粘流动复合材料,分别用于第2组(NC+蚀刻)和第3组(VF+蚀刻),并在应用前进行额外的蚀刻。第4组(NC)和第5组(VF)按各品牌说明书使用。用支架拆卸钳将支架剥离,在支架喷砂和牙釉质表面清洗后,用同样的程序重新粘合。测定每个样品的SBS和ARI。各组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和chissquare检验。SBS以NC+etch组最高(中位数= 11.44,平均= 13.49±9.42),其次为NC组(中位数= 10.17,平均= 11.35±6.55)、TXT组(中位数= 6.36,平均= 8.06±6.33)、VF组(中位数= 5.68,平均= 6.75±4.58)、VF组(中位数= 2.62,平均= 2.92±2.57)。在TXT的81.3%中观察到ARI 1,而在NC+etch的62.5%中观察到ARI 1。ARI 1、2、3在VF+etch组平均分布(31.3%)。37.5%的NC和62.5%的VF出现ARI 5。分析表明,五组之间在SBS和ARI方面的差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。NC在重粘过程中表现出最高的SBS,有望取代TXT作为金标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Orofacial Science
Archives of Orofacial Science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Salvage Mandibulectomy in an Octogenarian with Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report Histopathologic Changes in Dental Follicle Associated with Radiographically Normal Impacted Lower Third Molars The Key Role of Interleukin-17A/Interleukin-17RA in Bone Metabolism and Diseases: A Review An Enhanced Version of Sample Size Calculator, Scalex SP Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans of Parotid Region: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1