Micro-level evaluation of socio-technological interventions to address climate change-induced stresses in dairy enterprises

IF 0.2 Q4 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE INDIAN JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-10-31 DOI:10.33785/ijds.2021.v74i05.012
R. Chakravarty, K. Ponnusamy, R. Sendhil
{"title":"Micro-level evaluation of socio-technological interventions to address climate change-induced stresses in dairy enterprises","authors":"R. Chakravarty, K. Ponnusamy, R. Sendhil","doi":"10.33785/ijds.2021.v74i05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The paper aims at micro-level evaluation of dairy centric socio-technological interventions under the Technology Demonstration Component (TDC) of the National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) Project in Karnal, Yamunanagar and Sirsa districts of Haryana. The interventions were introduced to address the identified climate stresses under the project for enhancing resilience in dairy production. The study was conducted during 2015-16, employing Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) techniques to assess the farmers’ feedback on climate change perception and their acceptance and satisfaction of introduced interventions, from the NICRA adopted village in each district. Ten socio-technological interventions were evaluated each based on two dimensions of perceived attributes and benefits sub-evaluation parameters. The reason based satisfaction was recorded on a farmer rating for each intervention. Among six introduced technological interventions, improved fodder crop varieties (total score 28 and 30) and area specific mineral mixture supplementation (total score 28 to 29) were perceived as highly beneficial in terms of sustained milk production even during periods of heat stress followed by moderate beneficial of interventions viz ., Vitamin E supplementation, mustard oil supplementation and safe dung disposal through composting. Silage making intervention was perceived as low beneficial (total score 16). The Village Climate Risk Management Committee (VCRMC) was found as a highly beneficial (total score 27 to 30) social intervention, followed by women participation, contingency plan for climate change preparedness in fodder crops and preparation of season-centric milk products as moderate beneficial. The VCRMC was found highest satisfactory as rated by the farmers.","PeriodicalId":45524,"journal":{"name":"INDIAN JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INDIAN JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33785/ijds.2021.v74i05.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The paper aims at micro-level evaluation of dairy centric socio-technological interventions under the Technology Demonstration Component (TDC) of the National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) Project in Karnal, Yamunanagar and Sirsa districts of Haryana. The interventions were introduced to address the identified climate stresses under the project for enhancing resilience in dairy production. The study was conducted during 2015-16, employing Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) techniques to assess the farmers’ feedback on climate change perception and their acceptance and satisfaction of introduced interventions, from the NICRA adopted village in each district. Ten socio-technological interventions were evaluated each based on two dimensions of perceived attributes and benefits sub-evaluation parameters. The reason based satisfaction was recorded on a farmer rating for each intervention. Among six introduced technological interventions, improved fodder crop varieties (total score 28 and 30) and area specific mineral mixture supplementation (total score 28 to 29) were perceived as highly beneficial in terms of sustained milk production even during periods of heat stress followed by moderate beneficial of interventions viz ., Vitamin E supplementation, mustard oil supplementation and safe dung disposal through composting. Silage making intervention was perceived as low beneficial (total score 16). The Village Climate Risk Management Committee (VCRMC) was found as a highly beneficial (total score 27 to 30) social intervention, followed by women participation, contingency plan for climate change preparedness in fodder crops and preparation of season-centric milk products as moderate beneficial. The VCRMC was found highest satisfactory as rated by the farmers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应对气候变化引起的乳制品企业压力的社会技术干预措施的微观评价
:本文旨在对哈里亚纳邦卡纳尔、亚穆纳格尔和锡尔萨地区国家气候适应性农业创新项目技术示范部分(TDC)下以乳制品为中心的社会技术干预措施进行微观评估。引入这些干预措施是为了解决在提高乳制品生产弹性项目下确定的气候压力。该研究于2015-16年期间进行,采用参与式农村评估(PRA)技术来评估每个地区NICRA采用的村庄的农民对气候变化感知的反馈以及他们对引入干预措施的接受和满意度。根据感知属性和效益次级评估参数的两个维度,对10项社会技术干预措施进行了评估。基于原因的满意度记录在每次干预的农民评分中。在引入的六项技术干预措施中,改良的饲料作物品种(总分28和30)和特定地区的矿物质混合物补充(总分28至29)被认为对持续产奶非常有益,即使在热应激时期也是如此,随后是中等有益的干预措施,即。,补充维生素E、补充芥末油和通过堆肥安全处理粪便。青贮饲料干预被认为是低效益的(总分16)。乡村气候风险管理委员会(VCRMC)被认为是一种非常有益的社会干预措施(总分为27至30分),其次是妇女的参与、饲料作物气候变化应急计划和以季节为中心的奶制品的制备。农民对VCRMC的满意度最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
INDIAN JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
INDIAN JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Probiotic dairy dessert from camel milk – A review Supplementation of tomato pomace in lassi (a traditional Indian dairy product)and its effects on physico-chemical, functional attributes and shelf-life of lassi Development and evaluation of ginger-honey shrikhand – a fermented sweet delicacy Effect of cold plasma on the quality parameters of custard apple juice milk beverage Anti-oxidant activity of functional yoghurt incorporated with Hibiscus rosasinensis flower extract
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1