Envisioning Blindness in Eighteenth-Century Paris

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 ART OXFORD ART JOURNAL Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.1093/OXARTJ/KCAA003
E. Barker
{"title":"Envisioning Blindness in Eighteenth-Century Paris","authors":"E. Barker","doi":"10.1093/OXARTJ/KCAA003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diderot’s Letter on the Blind (1749) is widely held to have inaugurated a new, rational and humane approach to visual impairment, which, so it has further been argued, helped to shape the way that the blind were represented by eighteenth-century French artists. By contrast, this essay contends that such images are heavily indebted to iconographic convention and other established tropes of blindness, as well as to the professional and personal concerns of the artists. Most of these works depict a blind beggar from the Hopital des Quinze-Vingts, which was located in the heart of Paris; a quintessentially Parisian figure, the ‘quinze-vingt’ embodied the city’s street life. Such insights as the artists offer into blindness as a condition can be attributed as much to the familiarity of this figure as to the enlightened ideas of philosophers such as Diderot. Nor did works of art challenge the outsider status of the blind man, since it was in his isolation and vulnerability that the significance and appeal of this figure very largely lay. Works discussed include etchings by Abraham Bosse and Sebastien Le Clerc, a drawing by (and print after) Edme Bouchardon, paintings by Jean-Simeon Chardin and Jean-Baptiste Greuze and Jacques-Louis David’s Belisarius.","PeriodicalId":44264,"journal":{"name":"OXFORD ART JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/OXARTJ/KCAA003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OXFORD ART JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXARTJ/KCAA003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diderot’s Letter on the Blind (1749) is widely held to have inaugurated a new, rational and humane approach to visual impairment, which, so it has further been argued, helped to shape the way that the blind were represented by eighteenth-century French artists. By contrast, this essay contends that such images are heavily indebted to iconographic convention and other established tropes of blindness, as well as to the professional and personal concerns of the artists. Most of these works depict a blind beggar from the Hopital des Quinze-Vingts, which was located in the heart of Paris; a quintessentially Parisian figure, the ‘quinze-vingt’ embodied the city’s street life. Such insights as the artists offer into blindness as a condition can be attributed as much to the familiarity of this figure as to the enlightened ideas of philosophers such as Diderot. Nor did works of art challenge the outsider status of the blind man, since it was in his isolation and vulnerability that the significance and appeal of this figure very largely lay. Works discussed include etchings by Abraham Bosse and Sebastien Le Clerc, a drawing by (and print after) Edme Bouchardon, paintings by Jean-Simeon Chardin and Jean-Baptiste Greuze and Jacques-Louis David’s Belisarius.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
想象18世纪巴黎的失明
人们普遍认为,狄德罗的《关于盲人的信》(1749年)开创了一种新的、理性的、人道的方法来对待视力障碍,因此,人们进一步认为,这有助于塑造18世纪法国艺术家描绘盲人的方式。相比之下,这篇文章认为,这些图像严重依赖于图像传统和其他既定的失明比喻,以及艺术家的专业和个人关注。这些作品大多描绘了一个来自位于巴黎中心的昆兹维茨医院的盲人乞丐;“quinze-vingt”是典型的巴黎人,体现了这座城市的街头生活。艺术家们对失明的洞见,既可以归因于对这个人物的熟悉,也可以归因于狄德罗等哲学家的开明思想。艺术作品也没有挑战盲人的局外人地位,因为这个人物的意义和吸引力很大程度上在于他的孤立和脆弱。讨论的作品包括Abraham Bosse和Sebastien Le Clerc的蚀刻画,Edme Bouchardon的素描(以及之后的版画),Jean-Simeon Chardin和Jean-Baptiste Greuze的油画,以及Jacques-Louis David的Belisarius。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Oxford Art Journal has an international reputation for publishing innovative critical work in art history, and has played a major role in recent rethinking of the discipline. It is committed to the political analysis of visual art and material representation from a variety of theoretical perspectives, and has carried work addressing themes from Antiquity to contemporary art practice. In addition it carries extended review of major contributions to the field.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: The Morbid Symptoms of Capitalist Culture: Stuart Brisley’s Placement with Hille & Co. Furniture Factory (1970–1972) Ways of Seeing Impressionism circa 1968 On the Beaten Track Impressionism and Post-Impressionism: The Controversial Reception in China (1910–1950) What Makes Mina Loy Modern?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1