Differences in COVID-19 Outcomes Among Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: First vs Later Surges

Gallagher
{"title":"Differences in COVID-19 Outcomes Among Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: First vs Later Surges","authors":"Gallagher","doi":"10.12788/jcom.0084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patient outcomes of COVID-19 have improved throughout the pandemic. However, because it is not known whether outcomes of COVID-19 in the type 1 diabetes (T1D) population improved over time, we investigated differences in COVID-19 outcomes for patients with T1D in the United States. Methods: We analyzed data collected via a registry of patients with T1D and COVID-19 from 56 sites between April 2020 and January 2021. We grouped cases into first surge (April 9, 2020, to July 31, 2020, n=188) and late surge (August 1, 2020, to January 31, 2021, n=410), and then compared outcomes between both groups using descriptive statistics and logistic regression models. Results: Adverse outcomes were more frequent during the first surge, including diabetic ketoacidosis (32% vs 15%, P<.001), severe hypoglycemia (4% vs 1%, P=.04), and hospitalization (52% vs 22%, P<.001). Patients in the first surge were older (28 [SD,18.8] years vs 18.0 [SD, 11.1] years, P<.001), had higher median hemoglobin A1c levels (9.3 [interquartile range {IQR}, 4.0] vs 8.4 (IQR, 2.8), P<.001), and were more likely to use public insurance (107 [57%] vs 154 [38%], P<.001). The odds of hospitalization for adults in the first surge were 5 times higher compared to the late surge (odds ratio, 5.01;95% CI, 2.11-12.63). Conclusion: Patients with T1D who presented with COVID-19 during the first surge had a higher proportion of adverse outcomes than those who presented in a later surge. Keywords: TD1, diabetic ketoacidosis, hypoglycemia.","PeriodicalId":15393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/jcom.0084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Patient outcomes of COVID-19 have improved throughout the pandemic. However, because it is not known whether outcomes of COVID-19 in the type 1 diabetes (T1D) population improved over time, we investigated differences in COVID-19 outcomes for patients with T1D in the United States. Methods: We analyzed data collected via a registry of patients with T1D and COVID-19 from 56 sites between April 2020 and January 2021. We grouped cases into first surge (April 9, 2020, to July 31, 2020, n=188) and late surge (August 1, 2020, to January 31, 2021, n=410), and then compared outcomes between both groups using descriptive statistics and logistic regression models. Results: Adverse outcomes were more frequent during the first surge, including diabetic ketoacidosis (32% vs 15%, P<.001), severe hypoglycemia (4% vs 1%, P=.04), and hospitalization (52% vs 22%, P<.001). Patients in the first surge were older (28 [SD,18.8] years vs 18.0 [SD, 11.1] years, P<.001), had higher median hemoglobin A1c levels (9.3 [interquartile range {IQR}, 4.0] vs 8.4 (IQR, 2.8), P<.001), and were more likely to use public insurance (107 [57%] vs 154 [38%], P<.001). The odds of hospitalization for adults in the first surge were 5 times higher compared to the late surge (odds ratio, 5.01;95% CI, 2.11-12.63). Conclusion: Patients with T1D who presented with COVID-19 during the first surge had a higher proportion of adverse outcomes than those who presented in a later surge. Keywords: TD1, diabetic ketoacidosis, hypoglycemia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1型糖尿病患者新冠肺炎结局的差异:首次手术与后期手术
背景:在整个大流行期间,COVID-19患者的预后有所改善。然而,由于尚不清楚COVID-19在1型糖尿病(T1D)人群中的结局是否会随着时间的推移而改善,我们研究了美国T1D患者COVID-19结局的差异。方法:我们分析了2020年4月至2021年1月期间来自56个地点的T1D和COVID-19患者登记处收集的数据。我们将病例分为首次高峰(2020年4月9日至2020年7月31日,n=188)和晚期高峰(2020年8月1日至2021年1月31日,n=410),然后使用描述性统计和逻辑回归模型比较两组结果。结果:不良结局在第一次高潮时更为频繁,包括糖尿病酮症酸中毒(32%比15%,P< 0.001)、严重低血糖(4%比1%,P= 0.04)和住院(52%比22%,P< 0.001)。第一次激增的患者年龄较大(28 [SD,18.8]岁对18.0 [SD, 11.1]岁,P<.001),中位血红蛋白A1c水平较高(9.3[四分位数间距{IQR}, 4.0]对8.4 (IQR, 2.8), P<.001),并且更有可能使用公共保险(107[57%]对154 [38%],P<.001)。成人在第一次高峰中住院的几率是晚期高峰的5倍(优势比,5.01;95% CI, 2.11-12.63)。结论:在第一次高峰期间出现COVID-19的T1D患者的不良结局比例高于在随后的高峰中出现的患者。关键词:TD1,糖尿病酮症酸中毒,低血糖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Glucagon Prescription Rates for Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Following Implementation of an Electronic Health Records Intervention Quality Improvement in Health Care: From Conceptual Frameworks and Definitions to Implementation The Hospitalist Triage Role for Reducing Admission Delays: Impacts on Throughput, Quality, Interprofessional Practice, and Clinician Experience of Care Redesign of Health Care Systems to Reduce Diagnostic Errors: Leveraging Human Experience and Artificial Intelligence Patient Safety in Transitions of Care: Addressing Discharge Communication Gaps and the Potential of the Teach-Back Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1