The Truth about Built Better Than They Knew Studies

Q4 Social Sciences Perspectives on Political Science Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/10457097.2022.2089521
R. Reinsch
{"title":"The Truth about Built Better Than They Knew Studies","authors":"R. Reinsch","doi":"10.1080/10457097.2022.2089521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay will articulate Lawler’s understanding of the significance of “Built Better Than They Knew Studies” or what he also later referred to as “America’s Constitutional Thomism” to show how this approach best demonstrates the truth about America. “Built Better Than They Knew Studies” is the attempt to demonstrate that America’s constitutional order was not exclusively built on modern ideological formulations but was a proper political achievement rooted in the rich ensemble of truths in the Western constitutional tradition. Three thinkers loom large in explaining its merits for American constitutionalism: Alexis de Tocqueville, Orestes A. Brownson, and John Courtney Murray, S.J. Joining together their contributions is the notion that while the American founding was an incredible achievement, it was the handiwork of human beings, and like anything else it had, amidst its merits, certain problems and deficiencies. The task is for American citizens to bring out the full truth in their republican citizenship and relational lives in civil society.","PeriodicalId":55874,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Political Science","volume":"51 1","pages":"162 - 170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2022.2089521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This essay will articulate Lawler’s understanding of the significance of “Built Better Than They Knew Studies” or what he also later referred to as “America’s Constitutional Thomism” to show how this approach best demonstrates the truth about America. “Built Better Than They Knew Studies” is the attempt to demonstrate that America’s constitutional order was not exclusively built on modern ideological formulations but was a proper political achievement rooted in the rich ensemble of truths in the Western constitutional tradition. Three thinkers loom large in explaining its merits for American constitutionalism: Alexis de Tocqueville, Orestes A. Brownson, and John Courtney Murray, S.J. Joining together their contributions is the notion that while the American founding was an incredible achievement, it was the handiwork of human beings, and like anything else it had, amidst its merits, certain problems and deficiencies. The task is for American citizens to bring out the full truth in their republican citizenship and relational lives in civil society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建造得比他们知道的更好的真相研究
本文将阐述劳勒对“比他们知道的更好的建筑研究”或后来被他称为“美国宪法托马斯主义”的重要性的理解,以说明这种方法如何最好地展示了美国的真相。《建得比他们知道的更好》一书试图证明,美国的宪法秩序并非完全建立在现代意识形态的基础上,而是一项植根于西方宪法传统中丰富真理的适当政治成就。在解释美国立宪主义的优点时,三位思想家显得十分突出:亚历克西斯·德·托克维尔、奥瑞斯特斯·a·布朗森和约翰·考特尼·默里,S.J.把他们的贡献加在一起,得出了这样一种观点:尽管美国的建立是一项令人难以置信的成就,但它是人类的杰作,就像其他任何东西一样,它在优点中也有某些问题和不足。美国公民的任务是在他们的共和公民身份和公民社会的相关生活中充分揭示真相。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives on Political Science
Perspectives on Political Science Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Whether discussing Montaigne"s case for tolerance or Nietzsche"s political critique of modern science, Perspectives on Political Science links contemporary politics and culture to the enduring questions posed by great thinkers from antiquity to the present. Ideas are the lifeblood of the journal, which comprises articles, symposia, and book reviews. Recent articles address the writings of Aristotle, Adam Smith, and Plutarch; the movies No Country for Old Men and 3:10 to Yuma; and the role of humility in modern political thought.
期刊最新文献
Paul & Empire Criticism: Why and How? Paul & Empire Criticism: Why and How? by Najeeb T. Haddad, Cascade Books, Publication Date: 2023 Conversation as Political Education Defending Socrates: Political Philosophy Before the Tribunal of Science Defending Socrates: Political Philosophy Before the Tribunal of Science , by Alex Priou, Macon, Georgia: Mercer University Press, 184 pp., ISBN 978-0-88146-914-1, Publication Date: 2023 The Politics of Suicide: Miasma and Katharmos in Plato’s Political Thought “Worse than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism,” by Erwin Chemerinsky
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1