{"title":"Teaching artists in flow: policy implications of a responsive and communal pedagogy","authors":"L. Custodero, Claudia Calì, Katie Kresek","doi":"10.1080/10632913.2022.2037485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Teaching artists typically work as solo agents, without the comradery of a like-minded community. After a year of focus groups, teaching observations, and conversations with school and arts administrators, we identified a need for experienced teaching artists to have a chance to reflect upon, renew, and reconsider their teaching practices with others. We designed a 10-month professional development program delivered on-line (framed by in-person introductory and concluding sessions). For curriculum design, we drew upon several perspectives and practices including flow experience, responsive pedagogy, community, and self-study. Honoring the importance of seeing ourselves in others and the power of being seen, we describe specific experiences that contributed to the outcomes of the program. Questions around how, what, who, and where we teach are addressed vis-à-vis examples of student artistry. Implications for policy include attending to the symbiosis of theory and practice, the consideration of local needs, and the use of meaningful assessments.","PeriodicalId":37632,"journal":{"name":"Arts Education Policy Review","volume":"124 1","pages":"102 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts Education Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2022.2037485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Teaching artists typically work as solo agents, without the comradery of a like-minded community. After a year of focus groups, teaching observations, and conversations with school and arts administrators, we identified a need for experienced teaching artists to have a chance to reflect upon, renew, and reconsider their teaching practices with others. We designed a 10-month professional development program delivered on-line (framed by in-person introductory and concluding sessions). For curriculum design, we drew upon several perspectives and practices including flow experience, responsive pedagogy, community, and self-study. Honoring the importance of seeing ourselves in others and the power of being seen, we describe specific experiences that contributed to the outcomes of the program. Questions around how, what, who, and where we teach are addressed vis-à-vis examples of student artistry. Implications for policy include attending to the symbiosis of theory and practice, the consideration of local needs, and the use of meaningful assessments.
期刊介绍:
Arts Education Policy Review ( AEPR) presents discussion of major policy issues in arts education in the United States and throughout the world. Addressing education in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance, the journal presents a variety of views and emphasizes critical analysis. Its goal is to produce the most comprehensive and rigorous exchange of ideas available on arts education policy. Policy examinations from multiple viewpoints are a valuable resource not only for arts educators, but also for administrators, policy analysts, advocacy groups, parents, and audiences—all those involved in the arts and concerned about their role in education. AEPR focuses on analyses and recommendations focused on policy. The goal of any article should not be description or celebration (although reports of successful programs could be part of an article). Any article focused on a program (or programs) should address why something works or does not work, how it works, how it could work better, and most important, what various policy stakeholders (from teachers to legislators) can do about it. AEPR does not promote individuals, institutions, methods, or products. It does not aim to repeat commonplace ideas. Editors want articles that show originality, probe deeply, and take discussion beyond common wisdom and familiar rhetoric. Articles that merely restate the importance of arts education, call attention to the existence of issues long since addressed, or repeat standard solutions will not be accepted.