Financial Incentives and Fertility Choices: Evidence from India

Tirtha Chatterjee, Ritika Jain
{"title":"Financial Incentives and Fertility Choices: Evidence from India","authors":"Tirtha Chatterjee, Ritika Jain","doi":"10.1177/00194662221139337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article estimates the impact of a maternity cash transfer programme, Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana, implemented in India since 2011, on fertility choices. Since the scheme restricts the benefits to the first two births, we ask whether there is an impact on the likelihood of birth post implementation and if this behaviour is driven by son preference. We also test whether the scheme has affected the likelihood of female births. Our results give evidence in support of ‘stopping rule’ and we find that treated households reduce births only when their first two births are sons. However, we do not find any statistically significant impact of the likelihood of a female birth. We further find that post the implementation of the scheme, mothers and children are less likely to get better care for higher order births. JEL Codes: J13, J18","PeriodicalId":85705,"journal":{"name":"The Indian economic journal : the quarterly journal of the Indian Economic Association","volume":"71 1","pages":"673 - 688"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indian economic journal : the quarterly journal of the Indian Economic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662221139337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article estimates the impact of a maternity cash transfer programme, Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana, implemented in India since 2011, on fertility choices. Since the scheme restricts the benefits to the first two births, we ask whether there is an impact on the likelihood of birth post implementation and if this behaviour is driven by son preference. We also test whether the scheme has affected the likelihood of female births. Our results give evidence in support of ‘stopping rule’ and we find that treated households reduce births only when their first two births are sons. However, we do not find any statistically significant impact of the likelihood of a female birth. We further find that post the implementation of the scheme, mothers and children are less likely to get better care for higher order births. JEL Codes: J13, J18
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
财政激励与生育选择:来自印度的证据
本文估计了自2011年以来在印度实施的产妇现金转移计划Indira Gandhi Matitva Sahyog Yojana对生育选择的影响。由于该计划将福利限制在前两个孩子身上,我们想知道实施后是否会对出生的可能性产生影响,以及这种行为是否是由重男轻女驱动的。我们还测试了该计划是否影响了女性分娩的可能性。我们的研究结果提供了支持“停止规则”的证据,我们发现接受治疗的家庭只有在前两个孩子是儿子时才会减少出生。然而,我们没有发现女性出生的可能性有任何统计学上的显著影响。我们进一步发现,在该计划实施后,母亲和儿童不太可能得到更好的照顾来进行更高阶的分娩。JEL代码:J13、J18
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changing Employment Patterns: An Analysis of Rural Labour Force in Punjab Firm Size and Productivity in the Informal Sector: Evidence from India Revisiting India’s Export Potential: Modern Gravity Model Approach What Drives Corporate Saving in India? The Nexus Between Information Asymmetry and Liquidity of Stock: Evidence from the Indian Market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1