F-Duplicates and Trivialization: A Reply to Speaks

IF 0.4 0 PHILOSOPHY Faith and Philosophy Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.37977/FAITHPHIL.2020.37.4.7
Tien-Chun Lo
{"title":"F-Duplicates and Trivialization: A Reply to Speaks","authors":"Tien-Chun Lo","doi":"10.37977/FAITHPHIL.2020.37.4.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I will defend a strategy for employing perfect being theology that Jeff Speaks calls “restriction strategy.”� In Section I, I will outline what the restriction strategy is and explicate Speaks’s objection to it. In Section II, I will propose a response to Speaks’s objection. In Section III, the response will be refined to avoid objections. My contention will be that this refined version of perfect being theology avoids Speaks’s objection, and therefore can help theists find what divine attributes God has.","PeriodicalId":45294,"journal":{"name":"Faith and Philosophy","volume":"37 1","pages":"500-515"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Faith and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37977/FAITHPHIL.2020.37.4.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I will defend a strategy for employing perfect being theology that Jeff Speaks calls “restriction strategy.”� In Section I, I will outline what the restriction strategy is and explicate Speaks’s objection to it. In Section II, I will propose a response to Speaks’s objection. In Section III, the response will be refined to avoid objections. My contention will be that this refined version of perfect being theology avoids Speaks’s objection, and therefore can help theists find what divine attributes God has.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重复和琐碎化:对发言的回应
在这篇论文中,我将为一种使用完美存在神学的策略辩护,Jeff Speaks称之为“限制策略”� 在第一节中,我将概述什么是限制策略,并解释Speaks对此的反对意见。在第二节中,我们将对Speaks的反对意见提出回应。在第三节中,将对答复进行细化,以避免提出异议。我的论点是,这种完美存在神学的精炼版本避免了Speaks的反对,因此可以帮助有神论者找到上帝的神圣属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Heavenly Procreation The Value of a Meaningful Life as a Response to the Problem of Evil Luis R.G. Oliveira and Kevin J. Corcoran, eds., Common Sense Metaphysics: Essays in Honor of Lynne Rudder Baker Tobias Hoffmann, Free Will and the Rebel Angels in Medieval Philosophy Reading Anselm's Natural Theology Through a Palamite Lens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1