Axial Impeller-Only Fans with Optimal Hub-to-Tip Ratio and Blades Adapted for Minimum Exit Loss

IF 1.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.3390/ijtpp8010007
T. Carolus, K. Bamberger
{"title":"Axial Impeller-Only Fans with Optimal Hub-to-Tip Ratio and Blades Adapted for Minimum Exit Loss","authors":"T. Carolus, K. Bamberger","doi":"10.3390/ijtpp8010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study targets determining impellers of impeller-only axial fans with an optimal hub-to-tip ratio for the highest achievable total-to-static efficiency. Differently from other studies, a holistic approach is chosen. Firstly, the complete class of these fans is considered. Secondly, the radial distribution of blade sweep angle, stagger angle, chord length, and camber are varied to adapt the blades to the complex flow in the hub and tip regions. The tool being used is an optimization scheme with three key components: (i) a database created beforehand by Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS)-predicted performance characteristics of 14,000 designs, (ii) an artificial neural network as a metamodel for the fan performance as a function of 26 geometrical parameters, and (iii) an evolutionary algorithm for optimization, performed on the metamodel. Typically, the hub-to-tip ratios for the impellers proposed by the optimization scheme are smaller than those obtained by applying the classic design rules. A second outcome are the shapes of the blades, which are adapted for a minimum exit loss. These shapes deviate substantially from the classic and even the state-of-the-art “swept-only” or “swept with dihedral” designs. The chord length, stagger, and sweep angle are distributed from hub to tip in a complex manner. The inherent reason is that the scheme tries to minimize not only the dynamic exit loss but also frictional losses due to secondary flows in the hub and tip regions, which eventually results in the maximum achievable total-to-static efficiency. Upon request, the authors will provide the full geometry of the four impellers analysed in some detail in this study to any individual for experimental validation or further analysis of their performance.","PeriodicalId":36626,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtpp8010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study targets determining impellers of impeller-only axial fans with an optimal hub-to-tip ratio for the highest achievable total-to-static efficiency. Differently from other studies, a holistic approach is chosen. Firstly, the complete class of these fans is considered. Secondly, the radial distribution of blade sweep angle, stagger angle, chord length, and camber are varied to adapt the blades to the complex flow in the hub and tip regions. The tool being used is an optimization scheme with three key components: (i) a database created beforehand by Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS)-predicted performance characteristics of 14,000 designs, (ii) an artificial neural network as a metamodel for the fan performance as a function of 26 geometrical parameters, and (iii) an evolutionary algorithm for optimization, performed on the metamodel. Typically, the hub-to-tip ratios for the impellers proposed by the optimization scheme are smaller than those obtained by applying the classic design rules. A second outcome are the shapes of the blades, which are adapted for a minimum exit loss. These shapes deviate substantially from the classic and even the state-of-the-art “swept-only” or “swept with dihedral” designs. The chord length, stagger, and sweep angle are distributed from hub to tip in a complex manner. The inherent reason is that the scheme tries to minimize not only the dynamic exit loss but also frictional losses due to secondary flows in the hub and tip regions, which eventually results in the maximum achievable total-to-static efficiency. Upon request, the authors will provide the full geometry of the four impellers analysed in some detail in this study to any individual for experimental validation or further analysis of their performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有最佳轮毂与叶尖比和适应最小出口损失的叶片的轴流叶轮风扇
本研究的目标是确定具有最佳毂尖比的纯叶轮轴流风扇的叶轮,以获得最高的总静态效率。与其他研究不同的是,选择了一种全面的方法。首先,考虑这些风扇的完整类别。其次,改变叶片扫掠角、交错角、弦长和弯度的径向分布,使叶片适应轮毂和叶尖区域的复杂流动。所使用的工具是一个由三个关键组成部分组成的优化方案:(i)由雷诺平均Navier-Stokes(RANS)预先创建的14000个设计的预测性能特征数据库,(ii)作为26个几何参数函数的风扇性能元模型的人工神经网络,以及(iii)用于优化的进化算法,对元模型执行。通常,优化方案提出的叶轮的轮毂与叶尖之比小于应用经典设计规则获得的轮毂与翼尖之比。第二个结果是叶片的形状,其适用于最小的出口损失。这些形状与经典甚至最先进的“仅扫掠”或“二面体扫掠”设计大相径庭。弦长、交错和扫掠角以复杂的方式从轮毂到叶尖分布。其内在原因是,该方案不仅试图使动态出口损失最小化,还试图使轮毂和叶尖区域中二次流引起的摩擦损失最小化,这最终导致可实现的最大总静态效率。根据要求,作者将向任何个人提供本研究中详细分析的四个叶轮的完整几何形状,以便对其性能进行实验验证或进一步分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
21.40%
发文量
29
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Turbofan Performance Estimation Using Neural Network Component Maps and Genetic Algorithm-Least Squares Solvers Experimental Investigation of an Efficient and Lightweight Designed Counter-Rotating Shrouded Fan Stage Experimental Investigation of the Sensitivity of Forced Response to Cold Streaks in an Axial Turbine Heat Load Development and Heat Map Sensitivity Analysis for Civil Aero-Engines Numerical Investigation of Forced Response in a Transonic Compressor Stage—Highlighting Challenges Using Experimental Validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1