Expanding Ripeness Beyond Push and Pull: The Relevance of Mutually Enticing Opportunities (MEOs)

IF 1.2 Q3 ETHNIC STUDIES Ethnopolitics Pub Date : 2021-12-06 DOI:10.1080/17449057.2022.2004780
S. Vuković
{"title":"Expanding Ripeness Beyond Push and Pull: The Relevance of Mutually Enticing Opportunities (MEOs)","authors":"S. Vuković","doi":"10.1080/17449057.2022.2004780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n Building on the existing notions of ‘push and pull’ in ripeness theory—the perceptions of a Mutually Hurting Stalemate (MHS) and of a Way Out (WO)—this article aims to explore a less scrutinized third element which proves to be essential for ripeness to achieve its full potential: the perception of Mutually Enticing Opportunities (MEO). While the MHS has the capacity to disincentivize the conflicting parties from further pursuing confrontational strategies, and the WO may embolden them to explore negotiations as a viable alternative, neither one guarantees that what is negotiated will be sufficiently attractive for the parties to truly commit to the peacemaking process and see the negotiated agreement come through and make it endure in time. This article will provide conceptual clarity about the MEOs, by surveying four essential characteristics that need to exist for an opportunity to be truly mutually enticing: mutuality, exclusivity, interdependency, and cooperation. Furthermore, building on Zartman’s earlier work on MEOs, the article will expound procedural and substantive elements that ‘lock-in’ the parties into the peacemaking process, by having their needs, interests and demands fulfilled by newly formulated solutions.","PeriodicalId":46452,"journal":{"name":"Ethnopolitics","volume":"21 1","pages":"190 - 201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnopolitics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2022.2004780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract Building on the existing notions of ‘push and pull’ in ripeness theory—the perceptions of a Mutually Hurting Stalemate (MHS) and of a Way Out (WO)—this article aims to explore a less scrutinized third element which proves to be essential for ripeness to achieve its full potential: the perception of Mutually Enticing Opportunities (MEO). While the MHS has the capacity to disincentivize the conflicting parties from further pursuing confrontational strategies, and the WO may embolden them to explore negotiations as a viable alternative, neither one guarantees that what is negotiated will be sufficiently attractive for the parties to truly commit to the peacemaking process and see the negotiated agreement come through and make it endure in time. This article will provide conceptual clarity about the MEOs, by surveying four essential characteristics that need to exist for an opportunity to be truly mutually enticing: mutuality, exclusivity, interdependency, and cooperation. Furthermore, building on Zartman’s earlier work on MEOs, the article will expound procedural and substantive elements that ‘lock-in’ the parties into the peacemaking process, by having their needs, interests and demands fulfilled by newly formulated solutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越推拉的成熟:相互吸引的机会(MEOs)的相关性
基于成熟度理论中现有的“推拉”概念——相互伤害的僵局(MHS)和出路(WO)——本文旨在探索被证明对成熟度充分发挥其潜力至关重要的第三个因素:相互吸引的机会(MEO)的感知。虽然卫生部有能力阻止冲突各方进一步采取对抗战略,世界卫生组织可能鼓励他们探索谈判作为一种可行的替代方案,但两者都不能保证谈判的内容足以吸引各方真正致力于建立和平进程,并看到谈判达成的协议获得通过,并使其及时维持下去。本文将通过调查机会真正相互吸引所需存在的四个基本特征:互补性、排他性、相互依赖性和合作性,来明确meo的概念。此外,在Zartman早期关于meo的工作的基础上,本文将阐述程序性和实质性因素,通过新制定的解决方案满足各方的需要、利益和要求,将各方“锁定”在建立和平进程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnopolitics
Ethnopolitics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Does Increasing Ethnic Diversity Reduce Electoral Turnout? The Case of New Zealand 1957–2020 Does the Interpretation of Self-determination Affect Autonomy Struggles in Asia? Deserving of Assistance: The Social Construction of Ukrainian Refugees Between Inclusion and Exclusion: The Representations of Illegal Immigrants and Refugees on Spanish Party VOX’s Instagram During the First Year of the War in Ukraine Indigenous People’s Self-governing Bodies and the Role of Civil Society: The Case of the Norwegian Sámi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1