Stock market reactions to COVID-19 shocks: do financial market interventions walk the talk?

IF 9 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE China Finance Review International Pub Date : 2022-05-23 DOI:10.1108/cfri-01-2022-0011
M. Marobhe, Jonathan Mukiza Peter Kansheba
{"title":"Stock market reactions to COVID-19 shocks: do financial market interventions walk the talk?","authors":"M. Marobhe, Jonathan Mukiza Peter Kansheba","doi":"10.1108/cfri-01-2022-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeFollowing the COVID-19 outbreak, various economies imposed different financial interventions as part of initiatives to cushion their stock markets from deteriorating performance. Our article examines the effectiveness of these interventions in protecting stock markets during the pandemic.Design/methodology/approachThe authors employ Panel Vector Autoregression to model the magnitude and timing of shocks from COVID-19 to stock markets. The fixed effects regression is then utilized to assess the role of financial interventions in protecting stock markets during COVID-19. The study uses daily stock index returns as well COVID-19 containment measures stringency index data from 39 countries ranging from 2nd January 2020 to 30th September 2021.FindingsOur findings firstly reveal a significant positive stock market reaction to country-level containment measures stringency but only during the first wave of COVID-19. We secondly show that stock market functioning interventions that include short selling bans and circuit breakers amplify the positive effects of COVID-19 containment measures stringency on stock market performance.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors stress the need for policymakers and regulators to timely intervene in protecting economies and stock markets during crises such as COVID-19 in order to reduce panic among investors. Moreover, investors should adjust their portfolios by investing in stocks from countries that have proper financial market interventions in place.Originality/valueDespite growing body of literature on COVID-19 and stock market performance, there is limited evidence on the role of financial sector interventions to cushion stock markets during tumultuous conditions caused by the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":44440,"journal":{"name":"China Finance Review International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Finance Review International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cfri-01-2022-0011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

PurposeFollowing the COVID-19 outbreak, various economies imposed different financial interventions as part of initiatives to cushion their stock markets from deteriorating performance. Our article examines the effectiveness of these interventions in protecting stock markets during the pandemic.Design/methodology/approachThe authors employ Panel Vector Autoregression to model the magnitude and timing of shocks from COVID-19 to stock markets. The fixed effects regression is then utilized to assess the role of financial interventions in protecting stock markets during COVID-19. The study uses daily stock index returns as well COVID-19 containment measures stringency index data from 39 countries ranging from 2nd January 2020 to 30th September 2021.FindingsOur findings firstly reveal a significant positive stock market reaction to country-level containment measures stringency but only during the first wave of COVID-19. We secondly show that stock market functioning interventions that include short selling bans and circuit breakers amplify the positive effects of COVID-19 containment measures stringency on stock market performance.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors stress the need for policymakers and regulators to timely intervene in protecting economies and stock markets during crises such as COVID-19 in order to reduce panic among investors. Moreover, investors should adjust their portfolios by investing in stocks from countries that have proper financial market interventions in place.Originality/valueDespite growing body of literature on COVID-19 and stock market performance, there is limited evidence on the role of financial sector interventions to cushion stock markets during tumultuous conditions caused by the pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股市对新冠肺炎冲击的反应:金融市场干预是否符合要求?
目的新冠肺炎疫情爆发后,各经济体实施了不同的金融干预措施,作为缓解股市表现恶化的举措的一部分。我们的文章考察了这些干预措施在疫情期间保护股市的有效性。设计/方法论/方法作者采用面板向量自回归对新冠肺炎对股市的冲击幅度和时间进行建模。然后利用固定效应回归来评估新冠肺炎期间金融干预在保护股市方面的作用。该研究使用了每日股票指数回报率以及2020年1月2日至2020年9月30日期间39个国家的新冠肺炎遏制措施严格程度指数数据。发现我们的研究结果首次揭示了股市对国家层面遏制措施严格度的显著积极反应,但仅在第一波新冠肺炎期间。其次,我们表明,包括卖空禁令和断路器在内的股市运作干预措施放大了新冠肺炎遏制措施对股市表现的积极影响。研究局限性/含义作者强调,政策制定者和监管机构需要在新冠肺炎等危机期间及时干预保护经济和股票市场,以减少投资者的恐慌。此外,投资者应通过投资于有适当金融市场干预措施的国家的股票来调整投资组合。原创/价值尽管关于新冠肺炎和股市表现的文献越来越多,但关于金融部门干预措施在疫情造成的动荡条件下缓冲股市的作用的证据有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: China Finance Review International publishes original and high-quality theoretical and empirical articles focusing on financial and economic issues arising from China's reform, opening-up, economic development, and system transformation. The journal serves as a platform for exchange between Chinese finance scholars and international financial economists, covering a wide range of topics including monetary policy, banking, international trade and finance, corporate finance, asset pricing, market microstructure, corporate governance, incentive studies, fiscal policy, public management, and state-owned enterprise reform.
期刊最新文献
The valuation demand for accounting conservatism: evidence from firm-level climate risk measures Who gains favor with green investors amidst climate risk? Do green economy stocks matter for the carbon and energy markets? Evidence of connectedness effects and hedging strategies Exploring interconnections and risk evaluation of green equities and bonds: fresh perspectives from TVP-VAR model and wavelet-based VaR analysis Institutional ownership and cost of equity of Chinese firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1