Analysis of relationships between prior knowledge, approaches to learning, and mathematics performance among engineering students

Y. F. Zakariya, Hans Kristian Nilsen, Kirsten Bjørkestøl, S. Goodchild
{"title":"Analysis of relationships between prior knowledge, approaches to learning, and mathematics performance among engineering students","authors":"Y. F. Zakariya, Hans Kristian Nilsen, Kirsten Bjørkestøl, S. Goodchild","doi":"10.1080/0020739X.2021.1984596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approaches to learning have been identified as crucial factors that influence students’ mathematics performance. However, there have been mixed findings on which of the different approaches improve performance in undergraduate mathematics. Thus, this study aimed to unravel the specific effects of prior mathematics knowledge and approaches to learning on performance in mathematics among first-year engineering students. The design is cross-sectional, and the data are analysed with some structural equation modelling techniques. The findings show a positive effect of prior mathematics knowledge on performance. The effect of surface approaches to learning on performance is significant, negative, and surface approaches to learning mediate the effect of prior mathematics knowledge on performance. There are no substantial relations between prior mathematics knowledge, deep approaches to learning, and performance. Students who adopt surface approaches performed poorly but we found no evidence to claim that students who adopt deep approaches perform better in the course. By implication, our findings underscore the importance of discouraging engineering students from capitalizing on surface approaches to learning mathematics.","PeriodicalId":14026,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology","volume":"54 1","pages":"1015 - 1033"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1984596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Approaches to learning have been identified as crucial factors that influence students’ mathematics performance. However, there have been mixed findings on which of the different approaches improve performance in undergraduate mathematics. Thus, this study aimed to unravel the specific effects of prior mathematics knowledge and approaches to learning on performance in mathematics among first-year engineering students. The design is cross-sectional, and the data are analysed with some structural equation modelling techniques. The findings show a positive effect of prior mathematics knowledge on performance. The effect of surface approaches to learning on performance is significant, negative, and surface approaches to learning mediate the effect of prior mathematics knowledge on performance. There are no substantial relations between prior mathematics knowledge, deep approaches to learning, and performance. Students who adopt surface approaches performed poorly but we found no evidence to claim that students who adopt deep approaches perform better in the course. By implication, our findings underscore the importance of discouraging engineering students from capitalizing on surface approaches to learning mathematics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工科学生先验知识、学习方法和数学成绩之间的关系分析
学习方法被认为是影响学生数学成绩的关键因素。然而,关于哪种不同的方法可以提高本科生数学成绩,研究结果喜忧参半。因此,本研究旨在揭示先前数学知识和学习方法对工程系一年级学生数学成绩的具体影响。该设计是横截面的,并使用一些结构方程建模技术对数据进行了分析。研究结果表明,先前的数学知识对成绩有积极影响。表面学习方法对成绩的影响是显著的、消极的,而表面学习方法介导了先验数学知识对成绩的作用。先前的数学知识、深入的学习方法和表现之间没有实质性的关系。采用表面方法的学生表现不佳,但我们没有发现任何证据表明采用深层方法的学生在课程中表现更好。言下之意,我们的研究结果强调了劝阻工科学生利用表面方法学习数学的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Mathematics is pervading every study and technique in our modern world, bringing ever more sharply into focus the responsibilities laid upon those whose task it is to teach it. Most prominent among these is the difficulty of presenting an interdisciplinary approach so that one professional group may benefit from the experience of others. The International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology provides a medium by which a wide range of experience in mathematical education can be presented, assimilated and eventually adapted to everyday needs in schools, colleges, polytechnics, universities, industry and commerce. Contributions will be welcomed from lecturers, teachers and users of mathematics at all levels on the contents of syllabuses and methods of presentation.
期刊最新文献
Third-grade students’ strategies for presenting permutations of three or four objects Using modelling to motivate and teach differential equations Flexibility of differentiation procedures in calculus Demonstration of a partially automated assessment approach to create an individualised, open-ended modelling worksheet Lesson plays as an approach to learning to teach proving
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1