Efficacy of the Unilateral Uniportal Endoscopic Approach in Management of Monosegmental Lumbar Canal Stenosis

Ayman Mohamed Basha, A. Elnaggar, A. Moustafa, M. Abdel Bary
{"title":"Efficacy of the Unilateral Uniportal Endoscopic Approach in Management of Monosegmental Lumbar Canal Stenosis","authors":"Ayman Mohamed Basha, A. Elnaggar, A. Moustafa, M. Abdel Bary","doi":"10.21608/esj.2021.79421.1179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Data: Multiple surgical techniques have been used to treat spinal canal stenosis, including open, microscopic, and endoscopic decompression and fusion surgery. Purpose: This article investigates the safety and the efficacy of unilateral endoscopic decompression for patients with monosegmental degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LCS). Study Design: Prospective clinical case series. Patients and Methods: Thirty consecutive patients with degenerative LCS were treated with endoscopic laminotomy with medial facetectomy. Patients were treated with the EasyGO! 2nd Generation system (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) at our institutions between March 2018 and September 2020. Primary outcomes parameters included the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) to quantify pain and disability, respectively. The length of the incision, the duration of surgery, the operative blood loss, and the duration of hospital stay were calculated. The mean follow-up period for patients was 10.5 ± 2.3 (range, 6–12) months. Results: The mean age was 56.5 ± 5.7 years. All thirty patients had neurogenic claudication. 63% of the patients had bilateral leg pain, 37% had unilateral leg pain, and 66% had low back pain. Seven patients (23%) had motor weakness preoperatively. The spinal segments affected were as follows: L4-L5 in 22 cases; L3-L4 in 6 cases; L2-L3, one case; L5-S1, one case. There was a statistically significant reduction in the mean values of NPRS for both leg and back pain in the follow-up period (P < 0.001). Moreover, the ODI mean value was statistically significantly reduced in the follow-up period (P < 0.001). the mean operative blood loss was 147.2 ± 68.3 ml, the mean operative time was 134.7 ± 28.34 minutes, and the mean hospital stay was 1.4 ± 0.8 days. We had four patients with intraoperative dural tears (13%) with no postoperative CSF leak, three patients (10%) had superficial wound infection, no patients had deep wound infection or discitis, and no reoperation was reported in the follow-up period. Conclusion: The unilateral uniportal endoscopic approach is a safe and effective technique in patients with degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. It allows for adequate decompression of the neural elements and preserves spinal stability. (2021ESJ236)","PeriodicalId":11610,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/esj.2021.79421.1179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Data: Multiple surgical techniques have been used to treat spinal canal stenosis, including open, microscopic, and endoscopic decompression and fusion surgery. Purpose: This article investigates the safety and the efficacy of unilateral endoscopic decompression for patients with monosegmental degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LCS). Study Design: Prospective clinical case series. Patients and Methods: Thirty consecutive patients with degenerative LCS were treated with endoscopic laminotomy with medial facetectomy. Patients were treated with the EasyGO! 2nd Generation system (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) at our institutions between March 2018 and September 2020. Primary outcomes parameters included the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) to quantify pain and disability, respectively. The length of the incision, the duration of surgery, the operative blood loss, and the duration of hospital stay were calculated. The mean follow-up period for patients was 10.5 ± 2.3 (range, 6–12) months. Results: The mean age was 56.5 ± 5.7 years. All thirty patients had neurogenic claudication. 63% of the patients had bilateral leg pain, 37% had unilateral leg pain, and 66% had low back pain. Seven patients (23%) had motor weakness preoperatively. The spinal segments affected were as follows: L4-L5 in 22 cases; L3-L4 in 6 cases; L2-L3, one case; L5-S1, one case. There was a statistically significant reduction in the mean values of NPRS for both leg and back pain in the follow-up period (P < 0.001). Moreover, the ODI mean value was statistically significantly reduced in the follow-up period (P < 0.001). the mean operative blood loss was 147.2 ± 68.3 ml, the mean operative time was 134.7 ± 28.34 minutes, and the mean hospital stay was 1.4 ± 0.8 days. We had four patients with intraoperative dural tears (13%) with no postoperative CSF leak, three patients (10%) had superficial wound infection, no patients had deep wound infection or discitis, and no reoperation was reported in the follow-up period. Conclusion: The unilateral uniportal endoscopic approach is a safe and effective technique in patients with degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. It allows for adequate decompression of the neural elements and preserves spinal stability. (2021ESJ236)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单侧单门内镜入路治疗单节段性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效
背景资料:多种手术技术已被用于治疗椎管狭窄,包括开放式、显微镜下和内镜下减压融合手术。目的:探讨单侧内镜减压治疗单节段退行性腰椎管狭窄症(LCS)的安全性和有效性。研究设计:前瞻性临床病例系列。患者和方法:连续30例退行性LCS患者接受内窥镜椎板切开术和内侧面切除术治疗。患者接受了EasyGO治疗!2018年3月至2020年9月,我们机构的第二代系统(Karl Storz,德国图特林根)。主要结果参数包括数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS)和奥斯韦斯特里残疾指数(ODI),分别用于量化疼痛和残疾。计算切口长度、手术时间、手术失血量和住院时间。患者的平均随访期为10.5±2.3(6-12)个月。结果:平均年龄56.5±5.7岁。所有30名患者均出现神经源性跛行。63%的患者有双侧腿部疼痛,37%有单侧腿部疼痛,66%有腰痛。术前有7名患者(23%)出现运动无力。受影响的脊髓节段如下:L4-L5 22例;L3-L4 6例;L2-L3,1例;L5-S1,1例。在随访期间,腿部和背部疼痛的NPRS平均值均有统计学意义的降低(P<0.001)。此外,ODI平均值在随访期间也有统计学意义的减少(P<001)。平均手术失血量为147.2±68.3毫升,平均手术时间为134.7±28.34分钟,平均住院时间为1.4±0.8天。我们有4名患者术中硬膜撕裂(13%),术后没有脑脊液泄漏,3名患者(10%)有浅表伤口感染,没有患者有深部伤口感染或椎间盘炎,随访期间没有再次手术的报告。结论:单侧单门内镜入路治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症是一种安全有效的方法。它允许对神经元件进行充分的减压,并保持脊柱的稳定性。(2021ESJ236)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Extremity Peripheral Nerve Injuries: Is There Any Role of Specialized Field Hospital in the Management of Low-Velocity Penetrating Peripheral Nerve Injuries? Short-Segment Posterior Fixation with Index Level Screws versus Long-Segment Posterior Fixation in Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Awake Spine Surgery: Fad or Future? Pedicle Screw/Sublaminar Hook Fixation versus Pedicle Screw/Infraspinous Wire Fixation for Spondylolysis Repair: A Retrospective Comparative Study with MSCT Assessment Absence of the Musculocutaneous Nerve While Performing Nerve Transfer Surgery in a Patient with Brachial Plexus Injury, Rare Variant, and Review of Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1