Comparative effectiveness of erenumab versus oral preventive medications among migraine patients: A US claims database study

Q3 Medicine Cephalalgia Reports Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25158163211040061
S. Tepper, Juanzhi Fang, Lujia Zhou, P. Vo, Ahmad M. Abdrabboh, M. Glassberg, M. Ferraris
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of erenumab versus oral preventive medications among migraine patients: A US claims database study","authors":"S. Tepper, Juanzhi Fang, Lujia Zhou, P. Vo, Ahmad M. Abdrabboh, M. Glassberg, M. Ferraris","doi":"10.1177/25158163211040061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway, was developed specifically for preventive treatment of migraine. Objective: To compare the real-world effectiveness of erenumab and non-specific oral migraine preventive medication (OMPM) on acute medication usage and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among migraine patients. Methods: This retrospective US claims analysis included patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with migraine who initiated erenumab (May 01, 2018 and September 30, 2019) or OMPM (May 01, 2016 and October 31, 2017). Cohorts were matched 1:1 using the propensity score (PS) method with stratification. Acute medication usage, HCRU, and a composite endpoint of 1) outpatient visit with a migraine diagnosis and associated acute medication claim, 2) hospital admission with a primary migraine diagnosis, or 3) emergency room visit with a primary migraine diagnosis were assessed 6 months post-treatment initiation. Results: Following PS matching, both cohorts included 2,343 patients. At 6 months, erenumab was associated with significantly less acute medication usage versus OMPM, including number of types of acute medications used, number of claims per person, and proportion of patients using acute medication. HCRU and number of composite events were also significantly lower among erenumab users. Conclusion: Erenumab is more effective than OMPM at reducing acute medication usage and HCRU among migraine patients. Trial registration: N/A.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158163211040061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway, was developed specifically for preventive treatment of migraine. Objective: To compare the real-world effectiveness of erenumab and non-specific oral migraine preventive medication (OMPM) on acute medication usage and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among migraine patients. Methods: This retrospective US claims analysis included patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with migraine who initiated erenumab (May 01, 2018 and September 30, 2019) or OMPM (May 01, 2016 and October 31, 2017). Cohorts were matched 1:1 using the propensity score (PS) method with stratification. Acute medication usage, HCRU, and a composite endpoint of 1) outpatient visit with a migraine diagnosis and associated acute medication claim, 2) hospital admission with a primary migraine diagnosis, or 3) emergency room visit with a primary migraine diagnosis were assessed 6 months post-treatment initiation. Results: Following PS matching, both cohorts included 2,343 patients. At 6 months, erenumab was associated with significantly less acute medication usage versus OMPM, including number of types of acute medications used, number of claims per person, and proportion of patients using acute medication. HCRU and number of composite events were also significantly lower among erenumab users. Conclusion: Erenumab is more effective than OMPM at reducing acute medication usage and HCRU among migraine patients. Trial registration: N/A.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿仑单抗与口服预防药物在偏头痛患者中的疗效比较:一项美国索赔数据库研究
背景:Erenumab是一种靶向降钙素基因相关肽通路的全人源单克隆抗体,专门用于偏头痛的预防性治疗。目的:比较erenumab和非特异性口服偏头痛预防药物(OMPM)对偏头痛患者急性用药和保健资源利用(HCRU)的实际疗效。方法:这项回顾性美国索赔分析包括诊断为偏头痛的患者(≥18岁),他们开始使用erenumab(2018年5月1日和2019年9月30日)或OMPM(2016年5月1日和2017年10月31日)。使用倾向评分(PS)分层法对队列进行1:1匹配。急性药物使用、HCRU和复合终点(1)偏头痛诊断的门诊就诊和相关的急性药物索赔,2)原发性偏头痛诊断的住院,或3)原发性偏头痛诊断的急诊室就诊)在治疗开始后6个月进行评估。结果:在PS匹配后,两个队列均包括2343例患者。在6个月时,erenumab与OMPM相比,急性药物使用明显减少,包括使用的急性药物类型数量,人均索赔数量和使用急性药物的患者比例。在erenumab使用者中,HCRU和复合事件数量也显著降低。结论:Erenumab在降低偏头痛患者急性用药和HCRU方面比OMPM更有效。试验注册:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cephalalgia Reports
Cephalalgia Reports Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Protocol of a cross-sectional, multicentre and multidisciplinary study describing phenotype and burden of a midfacial segment pain Paranoid psychosis after a single parenteral dose of indomethacin administered for headache diagnosis: A case and review of the literature Extended regular use of kinetic oscillation stimulation (KOS) in refractory chronic migraine: case report of a first, single-subject experience Corrigendum to “Eptinezumab administered intravenously, subcutaneously, or intramuscularly in healthy subjects and/or patients with migraine: Early development studies” A century of bruxism research in top-ranking medical journals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1