{"title":"The Islamic Mary: Between Prophecy and Orthodoxy","authors":"Younus Y. Mirza","doi":"10.3366/jqs.2021.0479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article traces the medieval debate over the potential prophecy of the Islamic Mary (or Maryam). The debate is initiated by the Andalusian exegete and scholar Ibn Ḥazm (d. 456/1064) who argues that women, most importantly Mary, could be prophets because they were spoken to directly by God or His messengers. The argument is continued by al-Qurṭūbī (d. 671/1273), who makes a special case for Mary’s prophecy because the angel Gabriel is believed to have come close to her and ‘breathed’ his spirit into her. Mary is, furthermore, he asserts, one of the greatest prophets because she accepted God’s will without any question or scepticism. However, the argument that Mary was a prophet was refuted by the Damascene exegete Ibn Kathīr (d. 774/1373), who argued that Mary was not a prophet but rather truthful and righteous ( ṣiddīqa) according to the Qur’an. He bases his position on the fact that the Qur’an does not term any woman a prophet, and that she did not follow the path of those named as prophets, who called their people to a particular mission and cause. Ibn Kathīr’s argument eventually won the day as his tafsīr has become, in modern times, the most widespread and popular of all Qur’an commentaries.","PeriodicalId":43884,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quranic Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quranic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2021.0479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
This article traces the medieval debate over the potential prophecy of the Islamic Mary (or Maryam). The debate is initiated by the Andalusian exegete and scholar Ibn Ḥazm (d. 456/1064) who argues that women, most importantly Mary, could be prophets because they were spoken to directly by God or His messengers. The argument is continued by al-Qurṭūbī (d. 671/1273), who makes a special case for Mary’s prophecy because the angel Gabriel is believed to have come close to her and ‘breathed’ his spirit into her. Mary is, furthermore, he asserts, one of the greatest prophets because she accepted God’s will without any question or scepticism. However, the argument that Mary was a prophet was refuted by the Damascene exegete Ibn Kathīr (d. 774/1373), who argued that Mary was not a prophet but rather truthful and righteous ( ṣiddīqa) according to the Qur’an. He bases his position on the fact that the Qur’an does not term any woman a prophet, and that she did not follow the path of those named as prophets, who called their people to a particular mission and cause. Ibn Kathīr’s argument eventually won the day as his tafsīr has become, in modern times, the most widespread and popular of all Qur’an commentaries.
这篇文章追溯了中世纪关于伊斯兰玛丽(或玛丽亚姆)潜在预言的争论。这场争论是由安达卢西亚学者伊本发起的Ḥ阿兹姆(公元456/1064年),他认为妇女,最重要的是玛丽,可以成为先知,因为她们是上帝或他的使者直接与之交谈的。这场争论由al-Qur继续ṭ(公元671/1273年),他为玛丽的预言提出了一个特殊的理由,因为据信天使加布里埃尔走近了她,并将他的灵魂“吸入”了她。此外,他断言,玛丽是最伟大的先知之一,因为她毫无疑问地接受了上帝的意志。然而,关于玛丽是先知的论点被大马士革的exegete Ibn Kathīr(公元774/1373年)驳斥了,他认为玛丽不是先知,而是诚实和正义的(ṣiddīqa)。他的立场是基于这样一个事实,即《古兰经》没有将任何女性称为先知,她也没有遵循那些被称为先知的人的道路,他们号召自己的人民去完成特定的使命和事业。伊本·凯瑟尔的论点最终赢得了胜利,因为在现代,他的tafsīr已经成为所有古兰经评论中最广泛和最受欢迎的。