Phytochemical Analysis of Leaves and Cherries of Coffee and Sensory Evaluation of Tea Products of Robusta Coffee in Songkhla, Thailand

IF 0.6 Q4 AGRONOMY Agrivita Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.17503/agrivita.v41i0.3072
Y. Maxiselly, Pisamai Anusornwanit, A. Rugkong, R. Chiarawipa
{"title":"Phytochemical Analysis of Leaves and Cherries of Coffee and Sensory Evaluation of Tea Products of Robusta Coffee in Songkhla, Thailand","authors":"Y. Maxiselly, Pisamai Anusornwanit, A. Rugkong, R. Chiarawipa","doi":"10.17503/agrivita.v41i0.3072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research attempts to analyze the phytochemical compositions of both the leaves and the cherries of coffee and examine preference through the sensory evaluation of consumers consuming tea products of Robusta coffee from Songkhla, Thailand. The methods used for the phytochemical analysis were conducting an antioxidant content analysis using the Ferric ion reducing antioxidant power method, conducting total phenolic and tannin contents analysis using the Folin-Ciocalteau method, and conducting a total flavonoid content measurement using the aluminum chloride colorimetry method. For the sensory evaluation of tea products (leaves and cherries of coffee), a set of questionnaires was used as the survey observation tools to collect the data from consumers at some coffee and tea shops. The data analysis was using T-test for phytochemical composition and F-test on sensory evaluation. This study shows that Robusta coffee leaves and cherries contained phytochemical compounds of different values. Compared to the cherries, the leaves had higher values of phytochemical compositions. Based on the sensory evaluation of consumers, tea products made from leaves and cherries were highly rated. Coffee cherry tea demonstrated a higher percentage of interest compared with coffee leaf tea.","PeriodicalId":44658,"journal":{"name":"Agrivita","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrivita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v41i0.3072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The research attempts to analyze the phytochemical compositions of both the leaves and the cherries of coffee and examine preference through the sensory evaluation of consumers consuming tea products of Robusta coffee from Songkhla, Thailand. The methods used for the phytochemical analysis were conducting an antioxidant content analysis using the Ferric ion reducing antioxidant power method, conducting total phenolic and tannin contents analysis using the Folin-Ciocalteau method, and conducting a total flavonoid content measurement using the aluminum chloride colorimetry method. For the sensory evaluation of tea products (leaves and cherries of coffee), a set of questionnaires was used as the survey observation tools to collect the data from consumers at some coffee and tea shops. The data analysis was using T-test for phytochemical composition and F-test on sensory evaluation. This study shows that Robusta coffee leaves and cherries contained phytochemical compounds of different values. Compared to the cherries, the leaves had higher values of phytochemical compositions. Based on the sensory evaluation of consumers, tea products made from leaves and cherries were highly rated. Coffee cherry tea demonstrated a higher percentage of interest compared with coffee leaf tea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰国宋拉罗布斯塔咖啡叶和樱桃的植物化学分析及茶产品感官评价
该研究试图分析咖啡的叶子和樱桃的植物化学成分,并通过消费者消费来自泰国宋卡的罗布斯塔咖啡茶产品的感官评价来检查偏好。植物化学分析方法为:采用铁离子还原抗氧化力法进行抗氧化剂含量分析,采用Folin-Ciocalteau法进行总酚和单宁含量分析,采用氯化铝比色法进行总黄酮含量测定。对于茶产品(咖啡的叶子和樱桃)的感官评价,采用一套问卷作为调查观察工具,收集一些咖啡和茶店的消费者的数据。数据分析采用t检验,感官评价采用f检验。这项研究表明罗布斯塔咖啡叶和樱桃含有不同价值的植物化学化合物。与樱桃相比,叶子具有更高的植物化学成分值。根据消费者的感官评价,茶叶和樱桃制成的茶产品得到了很高的评价。与咖啡叶茶相比,咖啡樱桃茶显示出更高的兴趣百分比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agrivita
Agrivita AGRONOMY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
62
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The aims of the journal are to publish and disseminate high quality, original research papers and article review in plant science i.e.: -agronomy -horticulture -plant breeding -soil sciences -plant protection -other pertinent field related to plant production
期刊最新文献
Non-Destructive Model for Estimating Leaf Area and Growth of Cnidoscolus aconitifolius Cultivated Using Different Stem Diameter of the Semi Hardwood Cuttings Increased Production and Flavonoids of Two Celery Highland Varieties (Apium graveolens L.) by Endophytic Bacteria in Lowland Amylose Accumulation Under Water Deficit in Glutinous Rice (Oryza sativa L. Var. glutinosa) Katokkon Pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq.) Ploidy Determination by Morphological Characteristic and Flow Cytometry Analysis Effect of Co-Fertilizer Application and Dolomite Amendments on Yield and Grain Quality of Rice Grown on Post-Active Acid Sulfate Soil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1