The Wires of War: Technology and the Global Struggle for Power

IF 0.7 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Strategic Analysis Pub Date : 2023-03-04 DOI:10.1080/09700161.2023.2191418
Anubhav Gupta
{"title":"The Wires of War: Technology and the Global Struggle for Power","authors":"Anubhav Gupta","doi":"10.1080/09700161.2023.2191418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he defining feature of contemporary international politics is the global power struggle taking place at the intersection of technology and geopolitics. This power struggle has given way to a new ‘tech cold war’ between the United States and China. While the United States remains at the forefront of technological innovations, China has through decades of investment in gaining technological knowhow—at times through questionable means as well as through research and development—begun to compete with the best in the world. The quest for technological innovation and gaining an edge over competitors, however, does not remain confined to the United States and China, as other big and middle powers too have indulged in the struggle for acquiring advance technology both through technology transfer and innovation. There is a growing set of literature, coming especially from the United States, that tends to project this quest for technological superiority into the Cold War paradigm of bloc politics and struggle between democracies and authoritarian States for upholding the liberal international order. Jacob Helberg’s The Wires of War: Technology and the Global Struggle for Power is one such work that divides the world into the two camps focused on a rather self-fulfilling prophecy of a tech cold war. Helberg’s book essentially revolves around two competing narratives around technology: one, the United States’ liberal democratic narrative; and the other of the China–Russia authoritarian narrative. According to the author, the authoritarian techno bloc, which is characterised by opaqueness, centralisation, technology-based mass surveillance, State-sponsored attacks on democratic political systems and disinformation warfare, is an existential threat to the liberal democracies and the liberal international order. Helberg argues that today there is a war happening between liberal democracies and authoritarian States. This war is not a direct/hot war but an ambiguous, asymmetrical, indirect ‘grey’ war. He explains this grey war taking place at two levels; one is the battle for data and information including software, and the other is the quest for hardware and technological infrastructure like undersea cables and so on (p.19). Although the idea of a ‘grey war’ is not new and has been part of military strategies for a long time, it was a key feature of the Cold War period wherein the Strategic Analysis, 2023 Vol. 47, No. 2, 177–179, https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2023.2191418","PeriodicalId":45012,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Analysis","volume":"47 1","pages":"177 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2023.2191418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

T he defining feature of contemporary international politics is the global power struggle taking place at the intersection of technology and geopolitics. This power struggle has given way to a new ‘tech cold war’ between the United States and China. While the United States remains at the forefront of technological innovations, China has through decades of investment in gaining technological knowhow—at times through questionable means as well as through research and development—begun to compete with the best in the world. The quest for technological innovation and gaining an edge over competitors, however, does not remain confined to the United States and China, as other big and middle powers too have indulged in the struggle for acquiring advance technology both through technology transfer and innovation. There is a growing set of literature, coming especially from the United States, that tends to project this quest for technological superiority into the Cold War paradigm of bloc politics and struggle between democracies and authoritarian States for upholding the liberal international order. Jacob Helberg’s The Wires of War: Technology and the Global Struggle for Power is one such work that divides the world into the two camps focused on a rather self-fulfilling prophecy of a tech cold war. Helberg’s book essentially revolves around two competing narratives around technology: one, the United States’ liberal democratic narrative; and the other of the China–Russia authoritarian narrative. According to the author, the authoritarian techno bloc, which is characterised by opaqueness, centralisation, technology-based mass surveillance, State-sponsored attacks on democratic political systems and disinformation warfare, is an existential threat to the liberal democracies and the liberal international order. Helberg argues that today there is a war happening between liberal democracies and authoritarian States. This war is not a direct/hot war but an ambiguous, asymmetrical, indirect ‘grey’ war. He explains this grey war taking place at two levels; one is the battle for data and information including software, and the other is the quest for hardware and technological infrastructure like undersea cables and so on (p.19). Although the idea of a ‘grey war’ is not new and has been part of military strategies for a long time, it was a key feature of the Cold War period wherein the Strategic Analysis, 2023 Vol. 47, No. 2, 177–179, https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2023.2191418
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战争的电线:技术与全球权力斗争
当代国际政治的决定性特征是发生在技术和地缘政治交汇处的全球权力斗争。这种权力斗争已经让位于美国和中国之间的一场新的“科技冷战”。虽然美国仍然处于技术创新的前沿,但中国通过几十年的投资获得技术知识——有时是通过可疑的手段,有时是通过研究和开发——开始与世界上最好的国家竞争。然而,对技术创新和获得竞争优势的追求并不局限于美国和中国,因为其他大国和中等国家也沉迷于通过技术转让和创新获得先进技术的斗争。越来越多的文献,尤其是来自美国的文献,倾向于将这种对技术优势的追求,投射到集团政治的冷战范式中,以及民主国家和威权国家之间为维护自由国际秩序而进行的斗争。雅各布·赫尔伯格(Jacob Helberg)的《战争之线:技术与全球权力之争》就是这样一部作品,它将世界分为两个阵营,重点关注技术冷战的自我实现预言。赫尔伯格的书基本上围绕着两种相互竞争的技术叙事展开:一种是美国的自由民主叙事;另一种是中俄威权主义叙事。作者认为,以不透明、中央集权、以技术为基础的大规模监视、国家支持的对民主政治制度的攻击和虚假信息战为特征的专制技术集团,是对自由民主国家和自由国际秩序的生存威胁。赫尔伯格认为,今天在自由民主国家和专制国家之间正在发生一场战争。这场战争不是直接的/热战,而是一场模棱两可的、不对称的、间接的“灰色”战争。他从两个层面解释了这场灰色战争;一个是对包括软件在内的数据和信息的争夺,另一个是对诸如海底电缆等硬件和技术基础设施的追求(临19)。尽管“灰色战争”的概念并不新鲜,并且长期以来一直是军事战略的一部分,但它是冷战时期的一个关键特征,其中战略分析,2023年第47卷,第2期,177-179,https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2023.2191418
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Strategic Analysis
Strategic Analysis INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊最新文献
Comprehending NJ 9842 and the Region Beyond Iran as a Regional Power: More Constraints Than Flexibility Maoist Insurgency, State and People: Overlooked Issues and Unaddressed Grievances The South Asia-East Asia Linkage Process: Approached from the Perspective of President Joe Biden’s Administration The Enduring Partition and the Insider-Outsider Debate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1