The neo-fascist discourse and its normalisation through mediation

IF 1 Q3 COMMUNICATION Journal of Multicultural Discourses Pub Date : 2020-03-19 DOI:10.1080/17447143.2020.1743296
Bart Cammaerts
{"title":"The neo-fascist discourse and its normalisation through mediation","authors":"Bart Cammaerts","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2020.1743296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article, I set out to deconstruct the main nodal points of the neo-fascist discourse, using a multi-cultural political discourse analysis of Trump and Modi. Subsequently, mechanisms of the normalisation of the neo- fascist discourse will be discussed. I will argue that mediation plays a pivotal role in this process, which implicates both traditional as well as social media. Central to the normalisation of neo-fascism is a politics of provocation and a deep-rooted cultivation of victimhood. Whereas media and neo fascist politics often operate in an antagonistic relationship, neo-fascists create drama, emotion and consternation, which works well in the context of the current business model of media. Likewise, social media also profit from the self-mediation practices of neo-fascism. Using radical democratic theory and normative media and communication theory, I argue that journalists and social media companies have a moral duty to combat neo-fascism and its normalisation.","PeriodicalId":45223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","volume":"15 1","pages":"241 - 256"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17447143.2020.1743296","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2020.1743296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this article, I set out to deconstruct the main nodal points of the neo-fascist discourse, using a multi-cultural political discourse analysis of Trump and Modi. Subsequently, mechanisms of the normalisation of the neo- fascist discourse will be discussed. I will argue that mediation plays a pivotal role in this process, which implicates both traditional as well as social media. Central to the normalisation of neo-fascism is a politics of provocation and a deep-rooted cultivation of victimhood. Whereas media and neo fascist politics often operate in an antagonistic relationship, neo-fascists create drama, emotion and consternation, which works well in the context of the current business model of media. Likewise, social media also profit from the self-mediation practices of neo-fascism. Using radical democratic theory and normative media and communication theory, I argue that journalists and social media companies have a moral duty to combat neo-fascism and its normalisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新法西斯话语及其调解的正常化
摘要本文通过对特朗普和莫迪的多元文化政治话语分析,试图解构新法西斯话语的主要节点。随后,将讨论新法西斯话语正常化的机制。我认为,调解在这一过程中发挥着关键作用,它涉及传统媒体和社交媒体。新法西斯主义正常化的核心是挑衅政治和根深蒂固的受害者意识培养。尽管媒体和新法西斯政治经常处于对立关系中,但新法西斯主义者创造了戏剧性、情感和惊愕,这在当前媒体商业模式的背景下很有效。同样,社交媒体也从新法西斯主义的自我调解实践中获利。利用激进民主理论、规范媒体和传播理论,我认为记者和社交媒体公司有道德义务打击新法西斯主义及其正常化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The media and civil protests in Africa: contextualising Nigerian press coverage of #EndSARS Enchronic cultural discourse analysis: a semio-cultural study of national identity discourse of Saudi Founding Day A rhetorical-political framework for multilingual and translingual scholarship Interfacing the cultural dialectics of commodification and resistance: Nubian spatial/narrative repertoires as markers of hybrid diaspora culture Globalectics, critical discourse studies (CDS) and Southern feminisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1