Policy diffusion in federal systems during a state of emergency: diffusion of COVID-19 statewide lockdown policies across the United States

Sharon Elhadad, Udi Sommer
{"title":"Policy diffusion in federal systems during a state of emergency: diffusion of COVID-19 statewide lockdown policies across the United States","authors":"Sharon Elhadad, Udi Sommer","doi":"10.33119/kszpp/2022.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops a unified model of policy diffusion to analyze the speed of adoption of statewide lockdown policies within a federal system during the COVID-19 pandemic. The modified unified model was built to improve our understanding of policy diffusion in contexts where existing models fall short. The authors highlight three main policy diffusion channels: regional, vertical, and internal. The paper shows the empirical test of the model across US states and finds that vertical effects, such as higher approval ratings for President Donald Trump, as well as a comparatively high proportion of COVID-19 federal funding support, bear a strong positive association with the speed of statewide lockdown adoption policies. In addition, certain internal effects are also important - higher governor approval ratings are positively associated with the speed of statewide lockdown adoption policies, as are state and local spending, democratic state governments, and population awareness of the virus. However, other internal factors, such as the stringency of statewide lockdown policies and the relative proportion of COVID-19 deaths in a state, were minimally associated with the speed of lockdown policy adoption. Surprisingly, unlike past studies, horizontal regional effects did not play a significant role in the presented analysis - the speed of adoption of lockdown policies by neighboring states bears no association with the speed of policy adoption of statewide lockdowns. Overall, the results suggest a strong influence of political factors on the speed of statewide lockdown adoption policies in the US.","PeriodicalId":48550,"journal":{"name":"Studia Z Polityki Publicznej - the Journal of Public Policy Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Z Polityki Publicznej - the Journal of Public Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33119/kszpp/2022.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper develops a unified model of policy diffusion to analyze the speed of adoption of statewide lockdown policies within a federal system during the COVID-19 pandemic. The modified unified model was built to improve our understanding of policy diffusion in contexts where existing models fall short. The authors highlight three main policy diffusion channels: regional, vertical, and internal. The paper shows the empirical test of the model across US states and finds that vertical effects, such as higher approval ratings for President Donald Trump, as well as a comparatively high proportion of COVID-19 federal funding support, bear a strong positive association with the speed of statewide lockdown adoption policies. In addition, certain internal effects are also important - higher governor approval ratings are positively associated with the speed of statewide lockdown adoption policies, as are state and local spending, democratic state governments, and population awareness of the virus. However, other internal factors, such as the stringency of statewide lockdown policies and the relative proportion of COVID-19 deaths in a state, were minimally associated with the speed of lockdown policy adoption. Surprisingly, unlike past studies, horizontal regional effects did not play a significant role in the presented analysis - the speed of adoption of lockdown policies by neighboring states bears no association with the speed of policy adoption of statewide lockdowns. Overall, the results suggest a strong influence of political factors on the speed of statewide lockdown adoption policies in the US.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紧急状态期间联邦系统的政策扩散:新冠肺炎全州封锁政策在美国的扩散
本文开发了一个统一的政策扩散模型,以分析新冠肺炎大流行期间联邦系统内采取全州封锁政策的速度。建立修改后的统一模型是为了提高我们对现有模型不足的情况下政策扩散的理解。作者强调了三个主要的政策传播渠道:区域、垂直和内部。该论文展示了该模型在美国各州的实证检验,发现纵向效应,如唐纳德·特朗普总统的支持率更高,以及新冠肺炎联邦资金支持的比例相对较高,与全州采取封锁政策的速度有很强的正相关。此外,某些内部影响也很重要——更高的州长支持率与全州封锁政策的实施速度呈正相关,州和地方支出、民主州政府以及民众对病毒的认识也是如此。然而,其他内部因素,如全州封锁政策的严格程度和一个州新冠肺炎死亡人数的相对比例,与封锁政策的实施速度的关联最小。令人惊讶的是,与过去的研究不同,横向区域效应在所提出的分析中没有发挥重要作用——邻国采取封锁政策的速度与全州封锁政策的采取速度无关。总体而言,研究结果表明,政治因素对美国全州采取封锁政策的速度有很大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Z Polityki Publicznej - the Journal of Public Policy Studies
Studia Z Polityki Publicznej - the Journal of Public Policy Studies policy studies, public policy, sociology, public administration, public health -
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
A Phenomenological Study on the Path to Homelessness and Successful Self-reliance Experiences of the Homeless: Focusing on the Self-reliant Homeless in Busan Study on Economic-related Collaboration Conditions among Local Governments: Network Analysis of Local Governments Utilizing Big Data A Comparative Study on National Responses of Young Carers among UK, Australia, and Sweden A Study on the Current Status and Actual Condition of Historically Valuable Resources Management in Registration Offices Tension between the Patient’s Right of Self-determination and the Physician’s Duty to Treat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1