Understanding ‘fat shaming’ in a neoliberal era: Performativity, healthism and the UK’s ‘obesity epidemic’

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Feminist Theory Pub Date : 2021-11-22 DOI:10.1177/14647001211048300
Tanisha Jemma Rose Spratt
{"title":"Understanding ‘fat shaming’ in a neoliberal era: Performativity, healthism and the UK’s ‘obesity epidemic’","authors":"Tanisha Jemma Rose Spratt","doi":"10.1177/14647001211048300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how ‘fat shaming’ as a practice that encourages open disdain for those living in larger bodies operates as a moralising tool to regulate and manage those who are viewed as ‘bad citizens’. It begins by outlining the problematic use of fat shaming language that is often used as a tool to promote ‘healthy’ lifestyle choices by those who view it as not only an acceptable way of communicating the health risks associated with obesity, but also a productive way of motivating people with overweight and obesity to lose weight. I then go on to discuss how shame as it relates to body image and excess weight is culturally produced through both objective conceptualisations of deviance and subjective judgements about the moral character of those who are living with excess weight. Adopting a feminist theoretical perspective, this article further considers the reciprocal nature of fat shaming by calling attention to how shame as a felt emotion is dependent on understandings of oneself in relation to others, as well as the relationships that one forms with others. In this way, I argue that shame in general, and fat shaming in particular, is performative to the extent that it exists as a relational construct that is iteratively produced through the language and actions that give it meaning.","PeriodicalId":47281,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Theory","volume":"24 1","pages":"86 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Theory","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001211048300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This article explores how ‘fat shaming’ as a practice that encourages open disdain for those living in larger bodies operates as a moralising tool to regulate and manage those who are viewed as ‘bad citizens’. It begins by outlining the problematic use of fat shaming language that is often used as a tool to promote ‘healthy’ lifestyle choices by those who view it as not only an acceptable way of communicating the health risks associated with obesity, but also a productive way of motivating people with overweight and obesity to lose weight. I then go on to discuss how shame as it relates to body image and excess weight is culturally produced through both objective conceptualisations of deviance and subjective judgements about the moral character of those who are living with excess weight. Adopting a feminist theoretical perspective, this article further considers the reciprocal nature of fat shaming by calling attention to how shame as a felt emotion is dependent on understandings of oneself in relation to others, as well as the relationships that one forms with others. In this way, I argue that shame in general, and fat shaming in particular, is performative to the extent that it exists as a relational construct that is iteratively produced through the language and actions that give it meaning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解新自由主义时代的“肥胖羞辱”:表演、健康主义和英国的“肥胖流行病”
这篇文章探讨了“肥胖羞辱”作为一种鼓励公开蔑视那些体型较大的人的做法,是如何作为一种道德工具来规范和管理那些被视为“坏公民”的人的。它首先概述了脂肪羞辱语言的使用问题,这些语言经常被用作促进“健康”生活方式选择的工具,这些人认为它不仅是沟通肥胖相关健康风险的一种可接受的方式,也是激励超重和肥胖者减肥的一种有效方式。然后,我继续讨论与身体形象和超重相关的羞耻感是如何通过对越轨行为的客观概念化和对超重者道德品质的主观判断在文化上产生的。本文从女权主义理论的角度,进一步思考了肥胖羞辱的互惠性质,并呼吁人们注意羞耻作为一种情感是如何依赖于对自己与他人关系的理解,以及一个人与他人形成的关系。通过这种方式,我认为羞耻感,尤其是肥胖羞耻感,在某种程度上是表现性的,因为它是作为一种关系结构存在的,通过赋予它意义的语言和行动反复产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Theory
Feminist Theory WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Feminist Theory is an international interdisciplinary journal that provides a forum for critical analysis and constructive debate within feminism. Theoretical Pluralism / Feminist Diversity Feminist Theory is genuinely interdisciplinary and reflects the diversity of feminism, incorporating perspectives from across the broad spectrum of the humanities and social sciences and the full range of feminist political and theoretical stances.
期刊最新文献
Drafting injustice: overturning Roe v. Wade, spillover effects and reproductive rights in context. Countertopographies of copper: Martha Rosler, Chris Kraus and the Great Arizona Copper Strike of 1983–1986 Social Reproduction Feminism and World-Culture: Introduction Between familism and neoliberalism: the case of Jewish Israeli grandmothers Domestic service and Chilean literature: fictional experiments in narrating the household
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1