Evaluating the productivity and costs of five energywood harvesting operations in the lower Mid-Atlantic region of the U.S

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY International Journal of Forest Engineering Pub Date : 2021-12-29 DOI:10.1080/14942119.2021.2015676
Austin M. Garren, M. Bolding, S. Barrett, W. Aust, T. A. Coates
{"title":"Evaluating the productivity and costs of five energywood harvesting operations in the lower Mid-Atlantic region of the U.S","authors":"Austin M. Garren, M. Bolding, S. Barrett, W. Aust, T. A. Coates","doi":"10.1080/14942119.2021.2015676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Woody biomass is an important feedstock for renewable energy production in the United States. Residues are produced by forest harvests, and some operations utilize this material for energywood. Energywood requires additional processing and is often the lowest value product generated. Additional research quantifying the productivity and costs of energywood operations could allow stakeholders to evaluate the efficiency of those operations and identify areas for improvement. This study evaluated five energywood harvesting operations in the Lower Mid-Atlantic region of the United States (two Appalachian Mountain harvests and three Coastal Plain harvests). Each harvesting operation was observed for 4–7 days, and productivity data were collected on each harvesting function using time study and activity sampling methods. Productivity and costs of each operation were estimated, and equipment mixes and harvesting methods were evaluated to determine efficiency. Interviews were also conducted with each logging contractor to understand operating strategies and decision making. Cut and haul costs averaged (USD) $32.07/tonne and ranged from $26.19 to $38.28/tonne. Hauling consistently comprised the largest function cost at an average of $12.24/tonne. Machines handling energywood were less productive than those harvesting roundwood because of the large effect average stem size had on productivity levels. Harvesting system analysis also highlighted the importance of ensuring a balanced equipment mix to lower costs and ensure efficiency. This research provides stakeholders with a valuable comparison of energywood harvesting operations in the Lower Mid-Atlantic region of the United States that can be used to make better-informed decisions regarding the efficient and economical harvest of energywood.","PeriodicalId":55998,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Forest Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Forest Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2021.2015676","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Woody biomass is an important feedstock for renewable energy production in the United States. Residues are produced by forest harvests, and some operations utilize this material for energywood. Energywood requires additional processing and is often the lowest value product generated. Additional research quantifying the productivity and costs of energywood operations could allow stakeholders to evaluate the efficiency of those operations and identify areas for improvement. This study evaluated five energywood harvesting operations in the Lower Mid-Atlantic region of the United States (two Appalachian Mountain harvests and three Coastal Plain harvests). Each harvesting operation was observed for 4–7 days, and productivity data were collected on each harvesting function using time study and activity sampling methods. Productivity and costs of each operation were estimated, and equipment mixes and harvesting methods were evaluated to determine efficiency. Interviews were also conducted with each logging contractor to understand operating strategies and decision making. Cut and haul costs averaged (USD) $32.07/tonne and ranged from $26.19 to $38.28/tonne. Hauling consistently comprised the largest function cost at an average of $12.24/tonne. Machines handling energywood were less productive than those harvesting roundwood because of the large effect average stem size had on productivity levels. Harvesting system analysis also highlighted the importance of ensuring a balanced equipment mix to lower costs and ensure efficiency. This research provides stakeholders with a valuable comparison of energywood harvesting operations in the Lower Mid-Atlantic region of the United States that can be used to make better-informed decisions regarding the efficient and economical harvest of energywood.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估美国中大西洋下游地区五次能源木材采伐作业的生产力和成本
摘要Woody生物质是美国可再生能源生产的重要原料。残留物是由森林采伐产生的,一些作业将这种材料用于能源生产。Energywood需要额外的加工,通常是产生的价值最低的产品。量化能源之家运营的生产力和成本的额外研究可以让利益相关者评估这些运营的效率,并确定需要改进的领域。这项研究评估了美国下中大西洋地区的五次能源木材采伐作业(两次阿巴拉契亚山脉采伐和三次沿海平原采伐)。每次收割操作观察4-7天,并使用时间研究和活动抽样方法收集每个收割功能的生产力数据。对每项作业的生产力和成本进行了估计,并对设备组合和收割方法进行了评估,以确定效率。还对每个伐木承包商进行了访谈,以了解运营策略和决策。切割和运输成本平均为(美元)32.07美元/吨,从26.19美元到38.28美元/吨不等。运输一直是最大的功能成本,平均为12.24美元/吨。由于平均树干尺寸对生产力水平的影响很大,处理能量木的机器的生产力不如收割圆木的机器。收割系统分析还强调了确保设备组合平衡以降低成本和确保效率的重要性。这项研究为利益相关者提供了一个有价值的美国下中大西洋地区能源木材采伐作业的比较,可用于就高效经济的能源木材采伐做出更明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
21.10%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Productivity benchmarks for unguyed excavator-based tower yarders Novel approach for forest road maintenance using smartphone sensor data and deep learning methods Machine learning applications in forest and biomass supply chain management: a review Mechanical site preparation in South Africa: comparing the productivity of pitting machine operators under different site conditions Stem recovery and harvesting productivity of two different harvesting systems in final felling of Pinus patula
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1