J. Casajús, Á. Matute-Llorente, A. Gómez-Bruton, Gabriel Lozano-Berges, H. Herrero, G. Vicente-Rodríguez, A. González-Agüero
{"title":"Agreement of body composition methods in elite male football referees","authors":"J. Casajús, Á. Matute-Llorente, A. Gómez-Bruton, Gabriel Lozano-Berges, H. Herrero, G. Vicente-Rodríguez, A. González-Agüero","doi":"10.33155/J.RAMD.2019.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The current literature about the body composition of elite football referees is scarce and almost non-existent. Therefore, and in order to establish the level of agreement between bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in elite football referees, the aim of this study was to compare fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) values measured with these two different methods. \nMethod: A total of 30 male referees belonging to 1st, 2nd and 2ndB categories, and 36 assistant referees from 1st and 2nd categories in the Spanish national league participated in this study. Total and regional FM and FFM were assessed using a portable BIA analyser TANITA BC 418-MA (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and DXA (Hologic Corp. Software version 12.4, Bedford, MA 01730). Agreement between methods was assessed by plotting the results in Bland-Altman graphs and the presence of heteroscedasticity was also examined. Differences between methods were analysed by two-paired samples t-test. \nResults: For the whole group, BIA underestimated body fat percentage in 3.87 points (CI 95%=3.22-4.52; p=<0.01) and overestimated kg of total FFM in 3.56 points (CI 95%=3.08-4.05; p=<0.01), however, no heteroscedasticity was shown in any case (all p>0.05). \nConclusions: The present study suggests that according to DXA, BIA values calculated with a non-specific equation are underestimating total FM and, consequently, overestimating total FFM in male elite football referees.","PeriodicalId":39297,"journal":{"name":"Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33155/J.RAMD.2019.03.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective: The current literature about the body composition of elite football referees is scarce and almost non-existent. Therefore, and in order to establish the level of agreement between bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in elite football referees, the aim of this study was to compare fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) values measured with these two different methods.
Method: A total of 30 male referees belonging to 1st, 2nd and 2ndB categories, and 36 assistant referees from 1st and 2nd categories in the Spanish national league participated in this study. Total and regional FM and FFM were assessed using a portable BIA analyser TANITA BC 418-MA (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and DXA (Hologic Corp. Software version 12.4, Bedford, MA 01730). Agreement between methods was assessed by plotting the results in Bland-Altman graphs and the presence of heteroscedasticity was also examined. Differences between methods were analysed by two-paired samples t-test.
Results: For the whole group, BIA underestimated body fat percentage in 3.87 points (CI 95%=3.22-4.52; p=<0.01) and overestimated kg of total FFM in 3.56 points (CI 95%=3.08-4.05; p=<0.01), however, no heteroscedasticity was shown in any case (all p>0.05).
Conclusions: The present study suggests that according to DXA, BIA values calculated with a non-specific equation are underestimating total FM and, consequently, overestimating total FFM in male elite football referees.
目的:目前关于优秀足球裁判身体成分的文献很少,几乎不存在。因此,为了在精英足球裁判中建立生物电阻抗分析(BIA)和双能x射线吸收仪(DXA)之间的一致程度,本研究的目的是比较这两种不同方法测量的脂肪质量(FM)和无脂质量(FFM)值。方法:西班牙国家联赛1、2、2ndB级男裁判30人,1、2级助理裁判36人参与研究。使用便携式BIA分析仪TANITA BC 418-MA (TANITA公司,东京,日本)和DXA (Hologic公司软件版本12.4,Bedford, MA 01730)评估总FM和区域FM和FFM。通过在Bland-Altman图中绘制结果来评估方法之间的一致性,并检查异方差的存在。采用双配对样本t检验分析方法间差异。结果:对于整个组,BIA低估了3.87个点的体脂率(CI 95%=3.22-4.52;p = 0.05)。结论:本研究表明,根据DXA,用非特异性方程计算的BIA值低估了男性精英足球裁判的总FM,从而高估了总FFM。
期刊介绍:
El Centro Andaluz de Medicina del Deporte edita la Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte (RAMD) desde 2008 con periodicidad trimestral. Esta revista científica publica artículos originales de investigación, previamente sujetos a un proceso de selección y evaluación por pares, y constituye un foro para los científicos, especialistas y profesionales cuyas actividades están relacionadas con la actividad física, el deporte y la salud. Debido a la naturaleza multidisciplinaria de esta área, la revista cubre diferentes disciplinas relacionadas todas con la Medicina del Deporte, lo que la convierte en una publicación con un altísimo grado de interés para todos los profesionales relacionados con las Ciencias del Deporte.