Investigating Fraud Risks Assessment Practices in Public Sector Audits

IF 0.3 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal Pub Date : 2021-04-30 DOI:10.24191/apmaj.v16i1-08
Mohamad Mahsun, Nafsiah Mohamed, S. Yusuf, Indrawati Yuhertiana
{"title":"Investigating Fraud Risks Assessment Practices in Public Sector Audits","authors":"Mohamad Mahsun, Nafsiah Mohamed, S. Yusuf, Indrawati Yuhertiana","doi":"10.24191/apmaj.v16i1-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fraud Risk Assessment (FRA) is claimed to be an important activity at the audit planning stage in both the private and public sectors. In fact, because of the importance of FRA activities, Auditing Standards (SAS 99, ISA 240, ISSAI 1240) have required auditors to carry out FRAs at the audit planning stage. FRA is considered as the core activity of financial audit planning because of the impact of fraud on the sustainability of an entity, quality of life, and economic growth. This study aimed to determine the practice of FRA in public sector audits and to find out more about the obstacles faced by auditors during the audit process and to find out the causes of these obstacles by considering the approach to the Audit Standards used. This study found that auditors’ performance can be determined based on their complete compliance with audit standards. We have encountered a serious problem that requires firm action from the government or a competent official, namely the auditor’s willingness in preparing the Fraud Risk Assessment Matrix. In addition, we recommend the Audit Standards Board to adopt international public sector auditing standards and disseminate them through training for auditors, students, and professionals. Keywords: fraud risk assessment, public sector audit, auditor competency","PeriodicalId":41923,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/apmaj.v16i1-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Fraud Risk Assessment (FRA) is claimed to be an important activity at the audit planning stage in both the private and public sectors. In fact, because of the importance of FRA activities, Auditing Standards (SAS 99, ISA 240, ISSAI 1240) have required auditors to carry out FRAs at the audit planning stage. FRA is considered as the core activity of financial audit planning because of the impact of fraud on the sustainability of an entity, quality of life, and economic growth. This study aimed to determine the practice of FRA in public sector audits and to find out more about the obstacles faced by auditors during the audit process and to find out the causes of these obstacles by considering the approach to the Audit Standards used. This study found that auditors’ performance can be determined based on their complete compliance with audit standards. We have encountered a serious problem that requires firm action from the government or a competent official, namely the auditor’s willingness in preparing the Fraud Risk Assessment Matrix. In addition, we recommend the Audit Standards Board to adopt international public sector auditing standards and disseminate them through training for auditors, students, and professionals. Keywords: fraud risk assessment, public sector audit, auditor competency
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查公共部门审计舞弊风险评估实务
欺诈风险评估(FRA)被认为是私营和公共部门审计规划阶段的一项重要活动。事实上,由于FRA活动的重要性,审计准则(SAS 99、ISA 240、ISSAI 1240)要求审计师在审计规划阶段进行FRA。由于欺诈对实体的可持续性、生活质量和经济增长的影响,FRA被认为是财务审计规划的核心活动。本研究旨在确定FRA在公共部门审计中的实践,并通过考虑所使用的审计标准方法,进一步了解审计师在审计过程中面临的障碍,并找出这些障碍的原因。这项研究发现,审计师的绩效可以根据他们完全遵守审计标准来确定。我们遇到了一个严重的问题,需要政府或主管官员采取坚定的行动,即审计师是否愿意编制欺诈风险评估矩阵。此外,我们建议审计标准委员会采用国际公共部门审计标准,并通过对审计师、学生和专业人员的培训来传播这些标准。关键词:欺诈风险评估、公共部门审计、审计师能力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
The Intention of Empowering Excellence on the Path to Professional Qualification in Sustainable Development and Governance Is Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure Value Enhancing? Evidence from Top 100 Companies Corporate Reporting, Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Tax Aggressiveness: Evidence from Indonesia Islamic Work Ethics, Good Corporate Governance Practices and Fraudulent Financial Statements Council’s Online Disclosure of Accountability Practices: Isomorphism Inquiries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1