Perioperative Risk of the Sitting Position for Elective Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Case Series

Redi Rahmani, Stephen Susa, Stephen E. Sandwell, Kristopher T. Kimmell, P. Maurer, H. Silberstein, Jacob W Nadler, K. Walter
{"title":"Perioperative Risk of the Sitting Position for Elective Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Case Series","authors":"Redi Rahmani, Stephen Susa, Stephen E. Sandwell, Kristopher T. Kimmell, P. Maurer, H. Silberstein, Jacob W Nadler, K. Walter","doi":"10.1093/neuopn/okaa009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The sitting cervical position for elective posterior cervical decompression and fusion affords advantages over prone positioning, but remains unpopular due to concerns about venous air embolism (VAE).\n \n \n \n To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of sitting cervical surgery in our series and in the literature.\n \n \n \n To evaluate the incidence of complications, we retrospectively identified all adult patients who underwent elective sitting posterior cervical surgeries at our institution from 2009 to 2014. Using International Classification of Diseases-9 coding, we searched for incidences of air embolism, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis. Operative time, estimated blood loss, and case type distribution were also recorded. We then calculated the incidence of clinically significant VAE in sitting cervical surgeries.\n \n \n \n Between 2009 and 2014, 558 surgeries were performed in the sitting cervical position. No VAE was identified. The average operative time was 1 h 25 min. A total of 30-d perioperative complications among sitting position patients included 3 myocardial infarctions, 1 pulmonary embolism attributed to venous thrombosis, and 2 patients with deep venous thrombosis for a total cardiovascular complication rate of 1.1%. The incidence of clinically significant VAE in the literature is 1.5%.\n \n \n \n We present the second largest case series to date on the sitting position for cervical surgeries, highlighting its safety and efficacy. This position provides a surgical field with superior visualization, allowing decreased operative time and blood loss. The risk of clinically significant VAE is low. Intraoperative monitoring for these events with less invasive means is safe and effective.\n","PeriodicalId":93342,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/neuopn/okaa009","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuopn/okaa009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The sitting cervical position for elective posterior cervical decompression and fusion affords advantages over prone positioning, but remains unpopular due to concerns about venous air embolism (VAE). To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of sitting cervical surgery in our series and in the literature. To evaluate the incidence of complications, we retrospectively identified all adult patients who underwent elective sitting posterior cervical surgeries at our institution from 2009 to 2014. Using International Classification of Diseases-9 coding, we searched for incidences of air embolism, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis. Operative time, estimated blood loss, and case type distribution were also recorded. We then calculated the incidence of clinically significant VAE in sitting cervical surgeries. Between 2009 and 2014, 558 surgeries were performed in the sitting cervical position. No VAE was identified. The average operative time was 1 h 25 min. A total of 30-d perioperative complications among sitting position patients included 3 myocardial infarctions, 1 pulmonary embolism attributed to venous thrombosis, and 2 patients with deep venous thrombosis for a total cardiovascular complication rate of 1.1%. The incidence of clinically significant VAE in the literature is 1.5%. We present the second largest case series to date on the sitting position for cervical surgeries, highlighting its safety and efficacy. This position provides a surgical field with superior visualization, allowing decreased operative time and blood loss. The risk of clinically significant VAE is low. Intraoperative monitoring for these events with less invasive means is safe and effective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性颈椎后路手术中坐姿的围手术期风险:一个回顾性病例系列
与俯卧位相比,选择性颈椎后路减压和融合术的坐颈位具有优势,但由于担心静脉空气栓塞(VAE),仍然不受欢迎。在我们的系列和文献中证明坐式宫颈手术的安全性和有效性。为了评估并发症的发生率,我们回顾性地确定了2009年至2014年在我们机构接受选择性坐式颈椎后部手术的所有成年患者。使用国际疾病分类-9编码,我们搜索了空气栓塞、心肌梗死、肺栓塞和深静脉血栓形成的发生率。还记录了手术时间、估计失血量和病例类型分布。然后,我们计算了坐式宫颈手术中具有临床意义的VAE的发生率。2009年至2014年间,共进行了558例坐颈位手术。未发现VAE。平均手术时间为1小时25分钟。坐姿患者围手术期并发症共30天,和2名深静脉血栓形成患者,总心血管并发症发生率为1.1%。文献中具有临床意义的VAE的发生率为1.5%。我们介绍了迄今为止第二大关于宫颈手术坐姿的病例系列,强调了其安全性和有效性。该位置提供了一个具有良好可视性的手术区域,从而减少了手术时间和失血。发生具有临床意义的VAE的风险很低。采用微创手段对这些事件进行术中监测是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spinal Venous Vascular Ectasia With Unusual presentation of Abdominal Pain: Case Report Subsuperficial Pectoralis Fascial Placement of Implantable Pulse Generators in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: Technical Note Awake Surgery for a Patient With Glioblastoma and Severe Aphasia: Case Report Changes in Distributed Motor Network Connectivity Correlates With Functional Outcome After Surgical Resection of Brain Tumors Successful Treatment of Pure Aqueductal Pilomyxoid Astrocytoma and Arrested Hydrocephalus With Endoscopic Tumor Resection Followed by Chemotherapy: A Case Report and Technical Considerations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1