The Dark Shadow of Marital Rape: Need to Change the Narrative

D. Banerjee, T. Rao
{"title":"The Dark Shadow of Marital Rape: Need to Change the Narrative","authors":"D. Banerjee, T. Rao","doi":"10.1177/26318318221083709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marriage is an anthropological, cultural, and legal institution, that establishes socially sanctioned rights and obligations between individuals. In many cultures, marriage forms the basis for acknowledgement of sexual relationships. However, sexual violence and physical aggression within marriages have traditionally formed a grey legal area. Marital rape refers to “forcible sexual assault or violence by one spouse towards the other.”1 In other words, it’s the act of sexual intercourse with a spouse without his/her spouse’s consent. Though historically establishing sexual relationship between the married couple was considered as a “right” in many societies, the context of consent becomes equally important as among nonmarried individuals. Twentieth century onward, there has been growing international conventions and voices against sexual and intimate partner violence in marriages (more specifically for sexual violence against women).2 However, in spite of the known devastating consequences of any form of forcible sexual encounter, marital rape has remained under the shadow of legal ambiguity in many nations, outside the criminal law and widely tolerated. Marital rape is mostly, but not exclusively, experienced by women. It tends to form a vicious cycle of abusive relationships between the couple, perpetuating chronic violence. This also varies based on sociocultural and political ideologies. For example, the interpretations of the institution of marriage, traditional ways of viewing male and female sexuality, and cultural expectations of relationship dynamics among the husband-wife dyad have led to concerning reluctance of classifying nonconsensual marital sex as a punishable crime. These doctrines started getting challenged in the West between 1960s and 1970s during the “second wave feminism” that focused on gender respect, autonomy, and right to self-determination (concerning all matters of a women’s own physical self and identity).2 However, marital rape has been overlooked in literature and policies throughout centuries and “marriage” being used as a common exemption/defense in sexual assault cases. This has also led to invalidation of the experiences of marital rape survivors, reduced help-seeking, and persistent trauma.","PeriodicalId":34753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosexual Health","volume":"4 1","pages":"11 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosexual Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26318318221083709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marriage is an anthropological, cultural, and legal institution, that establishes socially sanctioned rights and obligations between individuals. In many cultures, marriage forms the basis for acknowledgement of sexual relationships. However, sexual violence and physical aggression within marriages have traditionally formed a grey legal area. Marital rape refers to “forcible sexual assault or violence by one spouse towards the other.”1 In other words, it’s the act of sexual intercourse with a spouse without his/her spouse’s consent. Though historically establishing sexual relationship between the married couple was considered as a “right” in many societies, the context of consent becomes equally important as among nonmarried individuals. Twentieth century onward, there has been growing international conventions and voices against sexual and intimate partner violence in marriages (more specifically for sexual violence against women).2 However, in spite of the known devastating consequences of any form of forcible sexual encounter, marital rape has remained under the shadow of legal ambiguity in many nations, outside the criminal law and widely tolerated. Marital rape is mostly, but not exclusively, experienced by women. It tends to form a vicious cycle of abusive relationships between the couple, perpetuating chronic violence. This also varies based on sociocultural and political ideologies. For example, the interpretations of the institution of marriage, traditional ways of viewing male and female sexuality, and cultural expectations of relationship dynamics among the husband-wife dyad have led to concerning reluctance of classifying nonconsensual marital sex as a punishable crime. These doctrines started getting challenged in the West between 1960s and 1970s during the “second wave feminism” that focused on gender respect, autonomy, and right to self-determination (concerning all matters of a women’s own physical self and identity).2 However, marital rape has been overlooked in literature and policies throughout centuries and “marriage” being used as a common exemption/defense in sexual assault cases. This has also led to invalidation of the experiences of marital rape survivors, reduced help-seeking, and persistent trauma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婚内强奸的阴影:需要改变叙事
婚姻是一种人类学、文化和法律制度,在个人之间确立了社会认可的权利和义务。在许多文化中,婚姻是承认性关系的基础。然而,婚姻中的性暴力和身体侵犯传统上形成了一个灰色的法律领域。婚内强奸是指“配偶一方对另一方的强迫性侵犯或暴力行为”。1换句话说,是指未经配偶同意而与配偶性交的行为。尽管从历史上看,在许多社会中,在已婚夫妇之间建立性关系被视为一项“权利”,但同意的背景与未婚个人一样重要。二十世纪以来,反对婚姻中性暴力和亲密伴侣暴力(更具体地说是针对妇女的性暴力)的国际公约和声音越来越多。2然而,尽管已知任何形式的强迫性遭遇都会造成毁灭性后果,但婚内强奸在许多国家仍然处于法律模糊的阴影下,在刑法之外并被广泛容忍。婚内强奸主要但不限于妇女。这往往会在夫妻之间形成一种虐待关系的恶性循环,使长期的暴力行为长期存在。这也因社会文化和政治意识形态而有所不同。例如,对婚姻制度的解释、看待男性和女性性行为的传统方式以及对夫妻二人关系动态的文化期望,导致人们不愿意将非性婚姻性行为归类为应受惩罚的罪行。在20世纪60年代至70年代的“第二波女权主义”中,这些学说开始在西方受到挑战,该运动侧重于性别尊重、自主和自决权(涉及女性自身身体自我和身份的所有问题)。2然而,几个世纪以来,婚内强奸在文献和政策中一直被忽视,“婚姻”被用作性侵案件中常见的豁免/辩护。这也导致婚内强奸幸存者的经历无效,寻求帮助的次数减少,创伤持续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Connection Between Depression, Sexual Frequency, and All-cause Mortality: Findings from a Nationally Representative Study Unprotected Risky Sex Among Men with Opioid Dependence: Is More Needed to Be Done? Study of Sexual Dysfunctions in Male Patients with Alcohol Dependence Syndrome Uncovering the Knowledge Gap: Sexual and Reproductive Health Education and Knowledge Among Unmarried Sri Lankan Youth Newer Challenges in Sexual Health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1