Age-specific percentile-based prostate-specific antigen cutoff values predict the risk of prostate cancer: A single hospital observation.

IF 4.7 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-09-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.37796/2211-8039.1415
Teng-Fu Hsieh, Hung-Lin Chen, Ying-Fang Hsia, Che-Chen Lin, Hsiu-Yin Chiang, Min-Yen Wu, Sheng-Hsuan Chen, Po-Fan Hsieh, Hsi-Chin Wu, Han Chang, Chin-Chi Kuo
{"title":"Age-specific percentile-based prostate-specific antigen cutoff values predict the risk of prostate cancer: A single hospital observation.","authors":"Teng-Fu Hsieh, Hung-Lin Chen, Ying-Fang Hsia, Che-Chen Lin, Hsiu-Yin Chiang, Min-Yen Wu, Sheng-Hsuan Chen, Po-Fan Hsieh, Hsi-Chin Wu, Han Chang, Chin-Chi Kuo","doi":"10.37796/2211-8039.1415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Testing for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is often recommended for men with a potential risk of prostate cancer (PCa) before requiring advanced examination. However, the best PSA cutoff value remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Object: </strong>We compared the predictive performance of age-specific percentile-based PSA thresholds with a conventional cutoff of >4 ng/mL for the risk of PCa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included men who received PSA measurements between 2003 and 2017 in a medical center in Taiwan. Logistic regression modeling was used to assess the association between age-specific percentile-based PSA thresholds and PCa risk in age subgroups. We further applied C-statistic and decision curve analysis to compare the predictive performance of age-specific percentile-based PSA with that of a conventional cutoff PSA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 626 patients with PCa and 40 836 patients without PCa. The slope of PSA in patients >60-year-old was almost 3 times that of those <60-year-old (0.713 vs 0.259). The risk effect sizes of the 75th percentile PSA cutoff (<60-year-old: 2.19; 60-70-year-old: 4.36; >70-year-old: 5.84 ng/mL) were comparable to those observed based on the conventional cutoff in all age groups. However, the discrimination performance of the 75th percentile PSA cutoff was better than that of the conventional cutoff among patients aged <60-year-old (C-statistic, 0.783 vs. 0.729, <i>p</i> < 0.05). The 75th percentile cutoffs also correctly identified an additional 2 patients with PCa for every 100 patients with PSA screening at the threshold probability of 20%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data support the use of the 75th percentile PSA cutoff to facilitate individualized risk assessment, particularly for patients aged <60-year-old.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":" ","pages":"9-24"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37796/2211-8039.1415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Testing for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is often recommended for men with a potential risk of prostate cancer (PCa) before requiring advanced examination. However, the best PSA cutoff value remains controversial.

Object: We compared the predictive performance of age-specific percentile-based PSA thresholds with a conventional cutoff of >4 ng/mL for the risk of PCa.

Methods: We included men who received PSA measurements between 2003 and 2017 in a medical center in Taiwan. Logistic regression modeling was used to assess the association between age-specific percentile-based PSA thresholds and PCa risk in age subgroups. We further applied C-statistic and decision curve analysis to compare the predictive performance of age-specific percentile-based PSA with that of a conventional cutoff PSA.

Results: We identified 626 patients with PCa and 40 836 patients without PCa. The slope of PSA in patients >60-year-old was almost 3 times that of those <60-year-old (0.713 vs 0.259). The risk effect sizes of the 75th percentile PSA cutoff (<60-year-old: 2.19; 60-70-year-old: 4.36; >70-year-old: 5.84 ng/mL) were comparable to those observed based on the conventional cutoff in all age groups. However, the discrimination performance of the 75th percentile PSA cutoff was better than that of the conventional cutoff among patients aged <60-year-old (C-statistic, 0.783 vs. 0.729, p < 0.05). The 75th percentile cutoffs also correctly identified an additional 2 patients with PCa for every 100 patients with PSA screening at the threshold probability of 20%.

Conclusions: Our data support the use of the 75th percentile PSA cutoff to facilitate individualized risk assessment, particularly for patients aged <60-year-old.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于年龄特异性百分位数的前列腺特异性抗原截止值预测前列腺癌的风险:单一医院观察
背景:前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测通常推荐给有潜在前列腺癌症(PCa)风险的男性,然后再进行进一步检查。然而,PSA的最佳截止值仍然存在争议。目的:我们比较了基于年龄特异性百分比的PSA阈值与PCa风险的传统临界值>4 ng/mL的预测性能。方法:我们纳入了2003年至2017年在台湾一家医疗中心接受PSA测量的男性。Logistic回归模型用于评估年龄亚组中基于年龄特异性百分位数的PSA阈值与前列腺癌风险之间的相关性。我们进一步应用C统计量和决策曲线分析来比较基于年龄百分位的PSA与传统截断PSA的预测性能。结果:我们确定了626名前列腺癌患者和40836名无前列腺癌患者。>60岁患者的PSA斜率几乎是70岁患者的3倍:5.84 ng/mL)与所有年龄组中基于常规截断值观察到的PSA斜率相当。然而在年龄段的患者中,第75百分位PSA截止值的识别性能优于传统截止值(p<0.05)。在阈值概率为20%的PSA筛查中,每100名患者中就有2名前列腺癌患者被第75百位PSA截止点正确识别个体化风险评估,特别是针对老年患者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Bio Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of biomaterials and biointerfaces including and beyond the traditional biosensing, biomedical and therapeutic applications. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrates knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important bio applications. The journal is specifically interested in work that addresses the relationship between structure and function and assesses the stability and degradation of materials under relevant environmental and biological conditions.
期刊最新文献
Retraction of "Real-Time Monitoring of Mitochondrial pH in HeLa Cells, Drosophila melanogaster, and Zebrafish Larvae Using BODIPY-Based Ratiometric Fluorescent Probes". Correction to "Systemic microRNA Delivery Using Polysaccharide-Coated Nanobubbles for Ultrasound-Mediated Therapy of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer". Green Marine Collagen-Chitosan Composites with Biocompatible, Hemostatic, and Pro-Healing Performance. Hierarchical Logic Control via DNA Polymerase-Driven Molecular Circuits. Silk Protein-Based Materials for Photothermal Therapy: From Morphologies to Multifunctional Applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1