The Poetics and Aesthetics of Otherness

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Experiment-A Journal of Russian Culture Pub Date : 2019-09-30 DOI:10.1163/2211730x-12341329
Maria Taroutina
{"title":"The Poetics and Aesthetics of Otherness","authors":"Maria Taroutina","doi":"10.1163/2211730x-12341329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nAlthough traditionally associated with the ascendance of National Romanticism, Slavic folklore, and the Neo-Russian style in painting, architecture, and the decorative arts, the Abramtsevo artistic circle was also privy to the inception and production of a number of manifestly Orientalist works, such as Vasilii Polenov’s Christ and the Adulteress (1888), Mikhail Vrubel’s ceramic sculptures of The Assyrian, The Egyptian Girl, The Pharaoh, and The Libyan Lion (1890s), and the costumes and set designs for the theatrical productions Judith (1878, 1898), Joseph (1880, 1881, 1887, 1889), The Black Turban (1884, 1887, 1889), King Saul (1890), and To the Caucasus (1891). In addition, a series of hybrid works that fused elements of the exotic with national thematic and stylistic content, such as Viktor Vasnetsov’s Underwater Kingdom (1884) and Mikhail Vrubel’s Princess Volkhova (1898), were likewise produced under the auspices of Savva Mamontov and the Abramtsevo community, thus blurring the boundaries between native and foreign, local and global, self and other, and Slavophilia and Orientalia. The present article posits that an understanding of the romanticized, Neo-Russian artistic and theatrical productions, and the nationalist polemics of the Abramtsevo artistic circle is necessarily incomplete without a detailed examination of the various Orientalist crosscurrents which informed and structured many of the group’s artworks throughout the 1880s and 1890s—a narrative that has been largely left out of scholarly accounts of the movement.","PeriodicalId":41469,"journal":{"name":"Experiment-A Journal of Russian Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/2211730x-12341329","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experiment-A Journal of Russian Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2211730x-12341329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although traditionally associated with the ascendance of National Romanticism, Slavic folklore, and the Neo-Russian style in painting, architecture, and the decorative arts, the Abramtsevo artistic circle was also privy to the inception and production of a number of manifestly Orientalist works, such as Vasilii Polenov’s Christ and the Adulteress (1888), Mikhail Vrubel’s ceramic sculptures of The Assyrian, The Egyptian Girl, The Pharaoh, and The Libyan Lion (1890s), and the costumes and set designs for the theatrical productions Judith (1878, 1898), Joseph (1880, 1881, 1887, 1889), The Black Turban (1884, 1887, 1889), King Saul (1890), and To the Caucasus (1891). In addition, a series of hybrid works that fused elements of the exotic with national thematic and stylistic content, such as Viktor Vasnetsov’s Underwater Kingdom (1884) and Mikhail Vrubel’s Princess Volkhova (1898), were likewise produced under the auspices of Savva Mamontov and the Abramtsevo community, thus blurring the boundaries between native and foreign, local and global, self and other, and Slavophilia and Orientalia. The present article posits that an understanding of the romanticized, Neo-Russian artistic and theatrical productions, and the nationalist polemics of the Abramtsevo artistic circle is necessarily incomplete without a detailed examination of the various Orientalist crosscurrents which informed and structured many of the group’s artworks throughout the 1880s and 1890s—a narrative that has been largely left out of scholarly accounts of the movement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
另类诗学与美学
虽然传统上与民族浪漫主义、斯拉夫民间传说和新俄罗斯风格在绘画、建筑和装饰艺术方面的优势联系在一起,但阿布拉姆泽沃艺术界也参与了许多明显的东方主义作品的诞生和生产,如瓦西里·波列诺夫的《基督与淫妇》(1888年),米哈伊尔·弗鲁贝尔的陶瓷雕塑《亚述人》、《埃及女孩》、《法老》和《利比亚狮子》(1890年)。以及舞台剧《朱迪思》(1878年、1898年)、《约瑟夫》(1880年、1881年、1887年、1889年)、《黑头巾》(1884年、1887年、1889年)、《扫罗王》(1890年)和《高加索之行》(1891年)的服装和布景设计。此外,在Savva Mamontov和Abramtsevo社区的支持下,一系列将异国元素与民族主题和风格内容融合在一起的混合作品,如Viktor Vasnetsov的《水下王国》(1884)和Mikhail Vrubel的《沃尔霍娃公主》(1898),也同样产生了,从而模糊了本土与外国,本地与全球,自我与他者,斯拉夫主义与东方主义之间的界限。本文认为,对浪漫化的新俄罗斯艺术和戏剧作品的理解,以及Abramtsevo艺术界的民族主义论战,如果没有对各种东方主义的交叉潮流进行详细的研究,必然是不完整的,这些东方学的交叉潮流在整个19世纪80年代和90年代为该团体的许多艺术作品提供了信息和结构——这一叙事在很大程度上被遗漏在了该运动的学术叙述中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experiment-A Journal of Russian Culture
Experiment-A Journal of Russian Culture HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stepan Sokolovskii, Novoe vremia, and the Cartoons of Empire Satire and Propaganda in the Graphic Art of Vladimir Lebedev Physiological Illustration and a Women’s Fashion Magazine: Vasilii Timm’s Satirical Cartoons in Listok dlia svetskikh liudei, 1843–1844 “Это только отрывки … как видения”. Сергей Судейкин и вокруг (1913–1917) The Devil and the Mullah: Satirical Personae in the Pre-Revolutionary Press of the South Caucasus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1