Young Jeong Lee, Hyunwook Kang, J. Choi, J. Moon, Young Jun Lee, Tae Kyung Ha, Ho Dong Lee
{"title":"Validation Study of a Contactless Monitoring Device for Vital Signs During Sleep and Sleep Architecture in Adults With Sleep-Disordered Breathing","authors":"Young Jeong Lee, Hyunwook Kang, J. Choi, J. Moon, Young Jun Lee, Tae Kyung Ha, Ho Dong Lee","doi":"10.17241/smr.2021.01144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective Few clinical studies have investigated the accuracy of non-contact monitoring devices for vital signs during sleep and sleep architecture in adults with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of a contactless monitoring device for 1) heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature during sleep and 2) sleep architecture in adults with SDB.Methods Thirty-five consecutive adults, who visited a tertiary university hospital due to suspected SDB, underwent a complete physical examination and standard (level 1) polysomnography plus body temperature measurement with a contactless monitoring device (HoneyCube System).Results A total of 30 subjects (mean age = 46.43 ± 12.9 years; male: female = 22: 8) were finally included, and five subjects were excluded due to inadequate data in this study. The intraclass correlation coefficient values of heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature measured using the contactless monitoring device were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.892, 0.928), 0.937 (95% CI: 0.919, 0.954), and 0.918 (95% CI: 0.895, 0.941), respectively. The mean kappa value for sleep architecture was 0.562 (95% CI: 0.529, 0.596).Conclusions The contactless monitoring device showed good (almost perfect) agreement in terms of heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature and moderate agreement in sleep architecture with contact measurements. These results suggest that the HoneyCube System is a good candidate device for sleep monitoring at home and in multiple accommodations.","PeriodicalId":37318,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17241/smr.2021.01144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background and Objective Few clinical studies have investigated the accuracy of non-contact monitoring devices for vital signs during sleep and sleep architecture in adults with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of a contactless monitoring device for 1) heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature during sleep and 2) sleep architecture in adults with SDB.Methods Thirty-five consecutive adults, who visited a tertiary university hospital due to suspected SDB, underwent a complete physical examination and standard (level 1) polysomnography plus body temperature measurement with a contactless monitoring device (HoneyCube System).Results A total of 30 subjects (mean age = 46.43 ± 12.9 years; male: female = 22: 8) were finally included, and five subjects were excluded due to inadequate data in this study. The intraclass correlation coefficient values of heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature measured using the contactless monitoring device were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.892, 0.928), 0.937 (95% CI: 0.919, 0.954), and 0.918 (95% CI: 0.895, 0.941), respectively. The mean kappa value for sleep architecture was 0.562 (95% CI: 0.529, 0.596).Conclusions The contactless monitoring device showed good (almost perfect) agreement in terms of heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature and moderate agreement in sleep architecture with contact measurements. These results suggest that the HoneyCube System is a good candidate device for sleep monitoring at home and in multiple accommodations.