Public-Sector Accounting Reforms and Governmental Efficiency: A Two-Stage Approach

IF 2 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Journal of Accounting Pub Date : 2022-08-19 DOI:10.1142/s1094406022500172
Beatriz Cuadrado-Ballesteros, Marco Bisogno, Giovanni Vaia
{"title":"Public-Sector Accounting Reforms and Governmental Efficiency: A Two-Stage Approach","authors":"Beatriz Cuadrado-Ballesteros, Marco Bisogno, Giovanni Vaia","doi":"10.1142/s1094406022500172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Synopsis The research problem We investigated the association between public-sector accounting reforms and efficiency at a central-government level, assessing efficiency through a global perspective. Motivation The effects of financial management reforms on efficiency have rarely been investigated. We contribute to the academic debate concerning both public-sector accounting reforms (implementation of international accounting standards and accrual-accounting systems) and governmental efficiency, merging two streams of literature that have not been investigated thoroughly. The test hypotheses [Formula: see text]: Countries that have implemented IPSAS are more efficient. [Formula: see text]: Countries that have implemented accrual-accounting systems are more efficient. Target population We used a sample of 22 European countries in the period 2010–2018. Adopted methodology We adopted a two-step approach: first, we created several efficiency indicators using different techniques; second, we implemented a model to test our hypotheses. Analyses Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique, DEA with application of the bootstrap technique, and Order-m model Findings Accrual accounting was positively associated with efficiency while findings did not totally support an association with IPSAS.","PeriodicalId":47122,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1094406022500172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Synopsis The research problem We investigated the association between public-sector accounting reforms and efficiency at a central-government level, assessing efficiency through a global perspective. Motivation The effects of financial management reforms on efficiency have rarely been investigated. We contribute to the academic debate concerning both public-sector accounting reforms (implementation of international accounting standards and accrual-accounting systems) and governmental efficiency, merging two streams of literature that have not been investigated thoroughly. The test hypotheses [Formula: see text]: Countries that have implemented IPSAS are more efficient. [Formula: see text]: Countries that have implemented accrual-accounting systems are more efficient. Target population We used a sample of 22 European countries in the period 2010–2018. Adopted methodology We adopted a two-step approach: first, we created several efficiency indicators using different techniques; second, we implemented a model to test our hypotheses. Analyses Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique, DEA with application of the bootstrap technique, and Order-m model Findings Accrual accounting was positively associated with efficiency while findings did not totally support an association with IPSAS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共部门会计改革与政府效率:分两个阶段研究
我们在中央政府层面调查了公共部门会计改革与效率之间的关系,通过全球视角评估效率。很少有人研究财务管理改革对效率的影响。我们为关于公共部门会计改革(国际会计准则和权责发生制的实施)和政府效率的学术辩论做出了贡献,合并了两种尚未彻底调查的文献流。检验假设[公式:见文本]:实施公共部门会计准则的国家效率更高。[公式:见原文]:实行权责发生制的国家效率更高。我们在2010-2018年期间使用了22个欧洲国家的样本。采用的方法我们采用了两步方法:首先,我们使用不同的技术创建了几个效率指标;其次,我们实施了一个模型来检验我们的假设。数据包络分析(DEA)技术、应用自举技术的DEA和Order-m模型发现权责发生制会计与效率呈正相关,但研究结果并不完全支持与公共部门会计准则的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The aim of The International Journal of Accounting is to advance the academic and professional understanding of accounting theory, policies and practice from the international perspective and viewpoint. The Journal editorial recognizes that international accounting is influenced by a variety of forces, e.g., governmental, political and economic. Thus, the primary criterion for manuscript evaluation is the incremental contribution to international accounting literature and the forces that impact the field. The Journal aims at understanding the present and potential ability of accounting to aid in analyzing and interpreting international economic transactions and the economic consequences of such reporting. These transactions may be within a profit or non-profit environment. The Journal encourages a broad view of the origins and development of accounting with an emphasis on its functions in an increasingly interdependent global economy. The Journal also welcomes manuscripts that help explain current international accounting practices, with related theoretical justifications, and identify criticisms of current policies and practice. Other than occasional commissioned papers or special issues, all the manuscripts published in the Journal are selected by the editors after the normal double-blind refereeing process.
期刊最新文献
Mobile Banking and Technical Efficiency of Commercial Banks in Kenya Probable at First Glance, but Unlikely After Closer Look: The Role of Cognitive Reflection Ability on the Assessment of Probabilistic Expressions IFRS Adoption Approaches and Accounting Quality Board Effect and the Moderating Role of CEOs/CFOs on Corporate Governance Disclosure: Evidence from East Africa Tax-Related Incentives and Expense Allocation in Non-Profit Organizations: Evidence from Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1