The Trials of Orpheus: Poetry, Science, and the Early Modern Sublime. Jenny C. Mann. Ancient World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2021. xxii + 272 pp. $39.95.

IF 1.2 1区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-07-25 DOI:10.1017/rqx.2023.301
A. Atkinson
{"title":"The Trials of Orpheus: Poetry, Science, and the Early Modern Sublime. Jenny C. Mann. Ancient World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2021. xxii + 272 pp. $39.95.","authors":"A. Atkinson","doi":"10.1017/rqx.2023.301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"epigrams, and verse letters, Donne, Joseph Hall, John Marston, and others were reacting against stanzaic poetry as a pretentious European import, cladding their thoughts instead in the looser, lighter, naughty-but-native garb of Chaucer. Marking a turning point in the history of the couplet, chapter 3 positions Ben Jonson as the poet who, following the Bishops’ Ban of 1599, “contributed most to snatching the couplet from the fires and bringing it into polite society” (83). The reader is reminded here that rhyme alone does not a couplet make; Jonson’s reform of the couplet largely hinged on his “regularizing its meter and pauses” (90). Bolstering the pursuit of rhyme not empty of reason, Jonson made the English couplet a more measured form whose steady pace was well suited to the task of expressing inner character and patterning virtuous living. Chapter 4 considers the impact of the English Civil War on verse form. Using Robert Herrick, Katherine Philips, and Abraham Cowley as case studies, Rush posits that the poets of the period sought “to retain the Jonsonian couplet but make it responsive to the passions,” not least to accommodate the “extreme grief of a mourning nation” (126). Chapter 5 brings us full circle to Milton, who in 1668 took arms against a sea of couplets. While contextualizing Milton’s famous renunciation of rhyme in light of “his effort to craft a style distinct from the affective lyrics of the Royalists” (161), Rush looks back at the poet’s earlier use of rhyme in Comus, Lycidas, and especially the sonnets. Ironically, Milton appears to be a son of Ben: wresting Jonsonian formalism from the royalists, his metric regularity and reasonable rhymes connoted discipline, civility, and liberty within bounds. It seems only fitting to close this review with a rhyme. In Cooper’s Hill (1655), John Denhammirrors the measured flow of the river Thames with lines that, while epitomizing the ethos of the heroic couplet, just so happen to provide proper praise for this book: Though deep, yet clear, though gentle, yet not dull, Strong without rage, without o’er-flowing full.","PeriodicalId":45863,"journal":{"name":"RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/rqx.2023.301","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

epigrams, and verse letters, Donne, Joseph Hall, John Marston, and others were reacting against stanzaic poetry as a pretentious European import, cladding their thoughts instead in the looser, lighter, naughty-but-native garb of Chaucer. Marking a turning point in the history of the couplet, chapter 3 positions Ben Jonson as the poet who, following the Bishops’ Ban of 1599, “contributed most to snatching the couplet from the fires and bringing it into polite society” (83). The reader is reminded here that rhyme alone does not a couplet make; Jonson’s reform of the couplet largely hinged on his “regularizing its meter and pauses” (90). Bolstering the pursuit of rhyme not empty of reason, Jonson made the English couplet a more measured form whose steady pace was well suited to the task of expressing inner character and patterning virtuous living. Chapter 4 considers the impact of the English Civil War on verse form. Using Robert Herrick, Katherine Philips, and Abraham Cowley as case studies, Rush posits that the poets of the period sought “to retain the Jonsonian couplet but make it responsive to the passions,” not least to accommodate the “extreme grief of a mourning nation” (126). Chapter 5 brings us full circle to Milton, who in 1668 took arms against a sea of couplets. While contextualizing Milton’s famous renunciation of rhyme in light of “his effort to craft a style distinct from the affective lyrics of the Royalists” (161), Rush looks back at the poet’s earlier use of rhyme in Comus, Lycidas, and especially the sonnets. Ironically, Milton appears to be a son of Ben: wresting Jonsonian formalism from the royalists, his metric regularity and reasonable rhymes connoted discipline, civility, and liberty within bounds. It seems only fitting to close this review with a rhyme. In Cooper’s Hill (1655), John Denhammirrors the measured flow of the river Thames with lines that, while epitomizing the ethos of the heroic couplet, just so happen to provide proper praise for this book: Though deep, yet clear, though gentle, yet not dull, Strong without rage, without o’er-flowing full.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄耳甫斯的审判:诗歌、科学和早期现代崇高。珍妮C.曼。古代世界。新泽西州普林斯顿:普林斯顿大学出版社,2021年。xxii+272页,39.95美元。
警句、韵文、多恩、约瑟夫·霍尔、约翰·马斯顿等人都反对斯坦格诗,认为它是自命不凡的欧洲舶来品,他们把自己的思想包裹在乔叟更宽松、更轻松、淘气但又不失本土特色的服装中。第三章标志着对联历史上的一个转折点,将本·琼森定位为1599年主教禁令之后的诗人,他“对从火中夺取对联并将其带入礼貌社会做出了最大贡献”(83)。这里要提醒读者的是,仅仅押韵并不能构成一副对联;约翰逊对对联的改革很大程度上取决于他“规范了对联的格律和停顿”(90)。琼森提倡追求不缺乏理性的韵律,使英语对联的形式更有节制,节奏稳定,非常适合表达内心性格和塑造高尚生活的任务。第四章探讨了英国内战对诗歌形式的影响。拉什以罗伯特·赫里克、凯瑟琳·菲利普斯和亚伯拉罕·考利为例,认为这一时期的诗人寻求“保留约翰逊对联,但使其对激情作出反应”,尤其是要适应“一个哀悼国家的极度悲伤”(126)。第五章把我们带回到弥尔顿,他在1668年拿起武器,反对大量的对联诗。拉什将弥尔顿著名的放弃押韵的做法放在“他努力创造一种不同于保皇党情感抒情诗的风格”(161)的背景下,回顾了弥尔顿早期在《科玛斯》、《利西达斯》,尤其是十四行诗中对押韵的使用。讽刺的是,弥尔顿似乎是本的儿子:从保皇党手中夺取了琼森的形式主义,他的韵律规律和合理的押韵意味着纪律,文明,和有限度的自由。用一首押韵的诗来结束这篇评论似乎是再合适不过了。在《库珀的山》(1655)中,约翰·丹汉姆用诗句反映了泰晤士河匀称的水流,这些诗句既体现了英雄对联的精神,又恰好为这本书提供了恰当的赞美:虽然深沉,但清晰,虽然温和,但不沉闷,坚强而不愤怒,不滔滔不绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY
RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Starting with volume 62 (2009), the University of Chicago Press will publish Renaissance Quarterly on behalf of the Renaissance Society of America. Renaissance Quarterly is the leading American journal of Renaissance studies, encouraging connections between different scholarly approaches to bring together material spanning the period from 1300 to 1650 in Western history. The official journal of the Renaissance Society of America, RQ presents twelve to sixteen articles and over four hundred reviews per year.
期刊最新文献
Governadoras: Women Administrators, Gender, and Colonization in Sixteenth-Century Portuguese America Cervantes and Don Quijote at Home and Abroad Reason of State, Stände, and Estates in German and English Exchanges over the Crisis in the Palatinate, 1618–24 Scottish History in the Eyes of Sixteenth-Century France The Donati-Ardinghelli Wedding of 1465: A Closer Reading of Braccio Martelli's Letter of April 27 to Lorenzo de’ Medici
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1