A Tale of Two Bioethics

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Perspectives in Biology and Medicine Pub Date : 2022-03-17 DOI:10.1353/pbm.2022.0008
R. D. de Vries
{"title":"A Tale of Two Bioethics","authors":"R. D. de Vries","doi":"10.1353/pbm.2022.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Phase 1 drug trials—first-in-human tests of new pharmaceuticals— are necessary for FDA approval, and healthy volunteers are necessary to conduct those trials. Bioethicists are rightly concerned with the morally problematic aspects of these trials: Are risks and benefits balanced? Are would-be volunteers sufficiently informed, and have they given proper consent? But these are not the only, or even the most worrisome, ethical problems with Phase 1 research. In Adverse Events (2020), Jill Fisher looks beyond these ordinary bioethical concerns to the moral complications associated with the motivations of healthy volunteers and the demands of the everyday work of running those trials. Her work is the latest example of a much needed “second bioethics.” Unlike the “first bioethics,” this approach views health-care institutions from the outside, examining the structural and organizational sources that generate the ethical quandaries bioethicists are called upon to mediate and the ethical problems they often fail to see. Adverse Events makes clear that the moral problems of medicine can only be addressed by supporting bioethics of both types—the first and the second.","PeriodicalId":54627,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2022.0008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Phase 1 drug trials—first-in-human tests of new pharmaceuticals— are necessary for FDA approval, and healthy volunteers are necessary to conduct those trials. Bioethicists are rightly concerned with the morally problematic aspects of these trials: Are risks and benefits balanced? Are would-be volunteers sufficiently informed, and have they given proper consent? But these are not the only, or even the most worrisome, ethical problems with Phase 1 research. In Adverse Events (2020), Jill Fisher looks beyond these ordinary bioethical concerns to the moral complications associated with the motivations of healthy volunteers and the demands of the everyday work of running those trials. Her work is the latest example of a much needed “second bioethics.” Unlike the “first bioethics,” this approach views health-care institutions from the outside, examining the structural and organizational sources that generate the ethical quandaries bioethicists are called upon to mediate and the ethical problems they often fail to see. Adverse Events makes clear that the moral problems of medicine can only be addressed by supporting bioethics of both types—the first and the second.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两个生命伦理学的故事
摘要:第一阶段药物试验——新药的首次人体试验——是美国食品药品监督管理局批准的必要条件,而健康的志愿者也必须进行这些试验。生物伦理学家理所当然地关注这些试验中存在道德问题的方面:风险和收益是否平衡?潜在的志愿者是否有足够的信息,他们是否给予了适当的同意?但这些并不是第一阶段研究中唯一的,甚至不是最令人担忧的伦理问题。在《不良事件》(2020)一书中,Jill Fisher超越了这些普通的生物伦理问题,关注了与健康志愿者的动机和日常试验要求相关的道德并发症。她的工作是急需的“第二生物伦理学”的最新例子。与“第一生物伦理学”不同,这种方法从外部看待医疗机构,研究产生伦理困境的结构和组织来源——生物伦理学家被要求调解,以及他们经常看不到的伦理问题。不良事件表明,医学的道德问题只能通过支持第一类和第二类生物伦理学来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 医学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, an interdisciplinary scholarly journal whose readers include biologists, physicians, students, and scholars, publishes essays that place important biological or medical subjects in broader scientific, social, or humanistic contexts. These essays span a wide range of subjects, from biomedical topics such as neurobiology, genetics, and evolution, to topics in ethics, history, philosophy, and medical education and practice. The editors encourage an informal style that has literary merit and that preserves the warmth, excitement, and color of the biological and medical sciences.
期刊最新文献
Organismal Superposition and Death "Inherently Limited by Our Imaginations": Health Anxieties, Politics, and the History of the Climate Crisis Diagnosis: What Is the Structure of Its Reasoning? Valuing the Acute Subjective Experience Lived Religion in Religious Vaccine Exemptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1