Public Institutions and Ngos Cooperation for Social Innovations in Post-Socialist Rural Poland

IF 1.2 Q3 GEOGRAPHY European Countryside Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.2478/euco-2022-0031
K. Zajda, Damian Mazurek
{"title":"Public Institutions and Ngos Cooperation for Social Innovations in Post-Socialist Rural Poland","authors":"K. Zajda, Damian Mazurek","doi":"10.2478/euco-2022-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Social innovation (SI), which is known as an alternative practice for solving social problems, can be implemented by various actors, including nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) and public institutions. This article addresses the implementation of SIs by public institutions in rural areas of Poland. Its aim is to answer two questions: 1) Does cooperation with NGOs distinguish rural public institutions in Poland that have implemented SIs from those that have not? 2) Does the level of human and financial resources of NGOs affect the level of cooperation between public institutions and NGOs from rural gminas? The results of an internet survey conducted on a random sample of 330 public institutions and 400 one-to-one interviews conducted on a random sample of NGOs from rural communes (rural gminas) are presented to answer the research questions posed. According to the findings, collaboration between public institutions and NGOs does not distinguish institutions that implemented SI and those that did not. In addition, the level of human and financial resources of NGOs was not a factor in determining whether or not public institutions cooperated with NGOs.","PeriodicalId":45589,"journal":{"name":"European Countryside","volume":"14 1","pages":"623 - 637"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Countryside","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2022-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Social innovation (SI), which is known as an alternative practice for solving social problems, can be implemented by various actors, including nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) and public institutions. This article addresses the implementation of SIs by public institutions in rural areas of Poland. Its aim is to answer two questions: 1) Does cooperation with NGOs distinguish rural public institutions in Poland that have implemented SIs from those that have not? 2) Does the level of human and financial resources of NGOs affect the level of cooperation between public institutions and NGOs from rural gminas? The results of an internet survey conducted on a random sample of 330 public institutions and 400 one-to-one interviews conducted on a random sample of NGOs from rural communes (rural gminas) are presented to answer the research questions posed. According to the findings, collaboration between public institutions and NGOs does not distinguish institutions that implemented SI and those that did not. In addition, the level of human and financial resources of NGOs was not a factor in determining whether or not public institutions cooperated with NGOs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共机构与非政府组织合作促进后社会主义波兰农村社会创新
社会创新作为解决社会问题的另一种实践方式,可以由包括非政府组织(ngo)和公共机构在内的各种行动者实施。本文讨论了波兰农村地区公共机构实施SIs的情况。它的目的是回答两个问题:1)与非政府组织的合作是否区分了波兰农村公共机构是否实施了si ?2)公益组织的人力财力水平是否会影响公益机构与农村ngo的合作水平?本文给出了对330个公共机构随机抽样的网络调查结果和对农村公社(rural gminas)的非政府组织随机抽样的400个一对一访谈的结果,以回答所提出的研究问题。根据调查结果,公共机构和非政府组织之间的合作并没有区分实施科学探究的机构和没有实施科学探究的机构。此外,非政府组织的人力和财力水平并不是决定公共机构是否与非政府组织合作的一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
29
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊介绍: European Countryside scope: ecology of rural landscape, rural sociology, demography and gender, multi-functional rural development, agriculture and other branches, rural geography, rural borderland, rural and agro-tourism, rural settlement, small towns as centers of rural micro-regions, rural planning and architecture.
期刊最新文献
Vertical Linkages in Agri-Food Supply Chains: Roles for Producers Public Good Agricultural Practices Certification Schemes in Chosen EU Countries Measuring Accessibility and Optimising Logistics of Marginal Land Grass Biomass in the Case of Northern Ostrobothnia, Finland Regional Economic Environment: Insights from North Macedonia’s Agricultural Sector Organic Food Consumption in Hungary – Factors Supporting Consumption Growth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1