Equibiaxial Planar Tension Test Method and the Simulation Analysis for Hyperelastic EAP Membrane

IF 2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Advances in Polymer Technology Pub Date : 2023-05-19 DOI:10.1155/2023/7343992
H. Luo, Yinlong Zhu, Haifeng Zhao, Luqiang Ma, Jingjing Zhang
{"title":"Equibiaxial Planar Tension Test Method and the Simulation Analysis for Hyperelastic EAP Membrane","authors":"H. Luo, Yinlong Zhu, Haifeng Zhao, Luqiang Ma, Jingjing Zhang","doi":"10.1155/2023/7343992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The equibiaxial planar tension test is an important method for determining the mechanical properties of hyperplastic membranes, and it is also critical to designing an effective equibiaxial tension test rig to meet experimental accuracy requirements. However, any analysis addressing the accuracy of this test is not reported in the literature. In this paper, an equibiaxial planar tension apparatus is proposed for conducting single-corner-point tension tests on hyperelastic electroactive polymer (EAP) membranes. The experimental data were compared with those obtained from two-corner-point-fixed tension tests and fitted with nonlinear material models, and the model’s parameters were also evaluated. Finally, the widely-used finite element software ABAQUS was employed to simulate equibiaxial planar tension methods and investigate the impact of clamping mode and point number on test accuracy as well as the uniformity of overall deformation. The test results indicate that the stress-strain curves for the two tensions remain consistent across small stretch ratios. However, as the stretch ratio increases (about \n \n λ\n >\n 2.25\n \n ) in two-corner-point-fixed tension, stress shielding may lead to a degradation of strain uniformity and result in greater stresses than single-corner-point tension. Additionally, both the three-parameter Yeoh model and the four-parameter Ogden model can provide an accurate description of the EAP membrane material. The simulation results indicate that the axial strain variation amplitudes remain below 5% within a region spanning approximately 80% of the specimen’s overall length from its center to edge and even below 1% within a region spanning 85% in the single-corner-point tension; stress inaccuracies increase with stretch ratio, while the calculated error is about 2.1% when \n \n λ\n =\n 4\n \n in the single-corner-point tension test, which has the smallest stress error among the tests; when the number of tension points is increased, the overall deformation becomes more sufficient, and the test accuracy improves as well. The conclusions drawn from this paper will be beneficial in designing equibiaxial planar tension test rigs and analyzing their accuracy and uniformity of deformation.","PeriodicalId":7372,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Polymer Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Polymer Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7343992","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The equibiaxial planar tension test is an important method for determining the mechanical properties of hyperplastic membranes, and it is also critical to designing an effective equibiaxial tension test rig to meet experimental accuracy requirements. However, any analysis addressing the accuracy of this test is not reported in the literature. In this paper, an equibiaxial planar tension apparatus is proposed for conducting single-corner-point tension tests on hyperelastic electroactive polymer (EAP) membranes. The experimental data were compared with those obtained from two-corner-point-fixed tension tests and fitted with nonlinear material models, and the model’s parameters were also evaluated. Finally, the widely-used finite element software ABAQUS was employed to simulate equibiaxial planar tension methods and investigate the impact of clamping mode and point number on test accuracy as well as the uniformity of overall deformation. The test results indicate that the stress-strain curves for the two tensions remain consistent across small stretch ratios. However, as the stretch ratio increases (about λ > 2.25 ) in two-corner-point-fixed tension, stress shielding may lead to a degradation of strain uniformity and result in greater stresses than single-corner-point tension. Additionally, both the three-parameter Yeoh model and the four-parameter Ogden model can provide an accurate description of the EAP membrane material. The simulation results indicate that the axial strain variation amplitudes remain below 5% within a region spanning approximately 80% of the specimen’s overall length from its center to edge and even below 1% within a region spanning 85% in the single-corner-point tension; stress inaccuracies increase with stretch ratio, while the calculated error is about 2.1% when λ = 4 in the single-corner-point tension test, which has the smallest stress error among the tests; when the number of tension points is increased, the overall deformation becomes more sufficient, and the test accuracy improves as well. The conclusions drawn from this paper will be beneficial in designing equibiaxial planar tension test rigs and analyzing their accuracy and uniformity of deformation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超弹性EAP膜的等双轴平面拉伸试验方法及仿真分析
等双轴平面拉伸试验是确定超滤膜力学性能的重要方法,也是设计有效的等双轴拉伸试验台以满足实验精度要求的关键。然而,文献中没有报道任何关于该测试准确性的分析。本文提出了一种等双轴平面拉伸装置,用于对超弹性电活性聚合物(EAP)膜进行单角点拉伸试验。将实验数据与两个角点固定张力试验数据进行了比较,并与非线性材料模型进行了拟合,同时对模型参数进行了评估。最后,利用广泛使用的有限元软件ABAQUS对等双轴平面拉伸方法进行了模拟,研究了夹紧方式和点数对测试精度以及整体变形均匀性的影响。试验结果表明,在较小的拉伸比下,两种张力的应力-应变曲线保持一致。然而,在两个角点固定张力下,随着拉伸比的增加(约λ>2.25),应力屏蔽可能导致应变均匀性的退化,并导致比单角点张力更大的应力。此外,三参数Yeoh模型和四参数Ogden模型都可以提供EAP膜材料的准确描述。模拟结果表明,在单角点张力下,轴向应变变化幅度在横跨试样从中心到边缘的总长度的大约80%的区域内保持在5%以下,在横跨85%的区域内甚至保持在1%以下;应力不准确度随着拉伸比的增加而增加,而单角点拉伸试验中λ=4时的计算误差约为2.1%,是试验中应力误差最小的;当张力点的数量增加时,整体变形变得更加充分,并且测试精度也提高。本文得出的结论将有助于设计等双轴平面拉伸试验台,分析其变形的准确性和均匀性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Polymer Technology
Advances in Polymer Technology 工程技术-高分子科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Advances in Polymer Technology publishes articles reporting important developments in polymeric materials, their manufacture and processing, and polymer product design, as well as those considering the economic and environmental impacts of polymer technology. The journal primarily caters to researchers, technologists, engineers, consultants, and production personnel.
期刊最新文献
Analysis and Optimization of Thermoplastic Polyurethane Infill Patterns for Additive Manufacturing in Pipeline Applications Antibacterial Effect of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles on Polyvinyl Chloride-Based Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis of Hydrogel Based on Poly (Acrylic Acid–Co-Vinyl Acetate) Grafted on Modified Recycled Cellulose for Use in Fertilizer Slow-Release System Rescaffolding Carbon Nanotubes in Thermoset Polymers by Heat Treatments Design and Application of Flexible Sensors in Human–Machine Interaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1