Limitations to Freedom of Religion or Belief in Indonesia: Norms and Practices

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Religion & Human Rights Pub Date : 2020-04-23 DOI:10.1163/18710328-bja10003
Z. Bagir, Asfinawati, Suhadi, Renata Arianingtyas
{"title":"Limitations to Freedom of Religion or Belief in Indonesia: Norms and Practices","authors":"Z. Bagir, Asfinawati, Suhadi, Renata Arianingtyas","doi":"10.1163/18710328-bja10003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The landscape of freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) in Indonesia has been shaped by two elements: first, the progressive adoption of human rights in the new laws and amended constitution, as a result of the democratization which started in 1998; second, the old governance of religion which acknowledges limited religious pluralism and emphasizes harmony over freedom. A striking feature resulting from this combination is the addition of “religious values” as a ground of FoRB limitation in the new chapter on human rights in the amended Constitution, which otherwise draws its inspiration from the ICCPR and other international human rights covenants. Indonesian “public order” and “public morals” are understood to consist of, among other things, respect and protection of religious values. While the emphasis on religious values and public order produces most restrictions, when it comes to limitations to FoRB on grounds of public health, the government seems reluctant to impose necessary restrictions.","PeriodicalId":42092,"journal":{"name":"Religion & Human Rights","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18710328-bja10003","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion & Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-bja10003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The landscape of freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) in Indonesia has been shaped by two elements: first, the progressive adoption of human rights in the new laws and amended constitution, as a result of the democratization which started in 1998; second, the old governance of religion which acknowledges limited religious pluralism and emphasizes harmony over freedom. A striking feature resulting from this combination is the addition of “religious values” as a ground of FoRB limitation in the new chapter on human rights in the amended Constitution, which otherwise draws its inspiration from the ICCPR and other international human rights covenants. Indonesian “public order” and “public morals” are understood to consist of, among other things, respect and protection of religious values. While the emphasis on religious values and public order produces most restrictions, when it comes to limitations to FoRB on grounds of public health, the government seems reluctant to impose necessary restrictions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚对宗教或信仰自由的限制:规范和实践
印度尼西亚的宗教或信仰自由状况是由两个因素形成的:第一,由于1998年开始的民主化,在新的法律和经修订的宪法中逐步采用了人权;第二,旧的宗教治理,承认有限的宗教多元化,强调和谐而不是自由。这种结合的一个显著特点是,在修订后的《宪法》中关于人权的新一章中增加了“宗教价值”作为限制自由的理由,而这一章的灵感则来自《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》和其他国际人权盟约。印度尼西亚的“公共秩序”和“公共道德”被理解为除其他外包括尊重和保护宗教价值。虽然对宗教价值观和公共秩序的强调产生了大多数限制,但当涉及到基于公共卫生的限制时,政府似乎不愿施加必要的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Religious Conscience or Religious Freedom? The Difference between Official Constitutional Norms and Actual Legal Restrictions in Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia Navigating the Tensions: Women’s Rights, Religion and Freedom of Religion or Belief Women’s Reproductive Rights and the Legacy of Religion in Ireland: The Eighth Amendment and Its Repeal Human Rights, Islam, and Debates around CEDAW Introduction: Women’s Religious Freedom and Freedom of Religion or Belief
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1