The "Swing-Door" Regrafting of Donor Site: An Alternative Method for Split-Thickness Skin Graft in the Hand.

IF 1.3 Q3 SURGERY Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS Pub Date : 2024-02-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2166-8995
Jin Soo Kim, Chan Ju Park, Sung Hoon Koh, Dong Chul Lee, Si Young Roh, Kyung Jin Lee
{"title":"The \"Swing-Door\" Regrafting of Donor Site: An Alternative Method for Split-Thickness Skin Graft in the Hand.","authors":"Jin Soo Kim, Chan Ju Park, Sung Hoon Koh, Dong Chul Lee, Si Young Roh, Kyung Jin Lee","doi":"10.1055/a-2166-8995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Skin defects in the hands are common injuries, and autologous skin grafting is the ideal treatment. However, complications can occur at the donor and recipient sites. This study compares the \"Swing-door\" technique with conventional skin grafting. <b>Methods</b>  From August 2019 to February 2023, 19 patients with skin defects of hand underwent the \"Swing-door\" split-thickness skin graft (STSG) technique. The thin epithelial layer was elevated with proximal part attached. Skin graft was harvested beneath. Donor site was then closed with epithelial flap like a \"Swing-door\". The outcomes were evaluated in terms of healing time, scar formation, and pain at the donor and recipient sites. The data were compared with the conventional STSG. <b>Results</b>  The \"Swing-door\" group had lower graft take percentages, but complications did not significantly differ between the two groups. The \"Swing-door\" technique resulted in better cosmetic outcomes, as evidenced by lower Vancouver Scar Scale scores, faster donor site epithelialization, and reduced pain and discomfort during the early postoperative period, as measured by Visual Analog Scale. <b>Conclusion</b>  The \"Swing-door\" STSG is a useful alternative for treating hand skin defects.</p>","PeriodicalId":47543,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10901598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2166-8995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  Skin defects in the hands are common injuries, and autologous skin grafting is the ideal treatment. However, complications can occur at the donor and recipient sites. This study compares the "Swing-door" technique with conventional skin grafting. Methods  From August 2019 to February 2023, 19 patients with skin defects of hand underwent the "Swing-door" split-thickness skin graft (STSG) technique. The thin epithelial layer was elevated with proximal part attached. Skin graft was harvested beneath. Donor site was then closed with epithelial flap like a "Swing-door". The outcomes were evaluated in terms of healing time, scar formation, and pain at the donor and recipient sites. The data were compared with the conventional STSG. Results  The "Swing-door" group had lower graft take percentages, but complications did not significantly differ between the two groups. The "Swing-door" technique resulted in better cosmetic outcomes, as evidenced by lower Vancouver Scar Scale scores, faster donor site epithelialization, and reduced pain and discomfort during the early postoperative period, as measured by Visual Analog Scale. Conclusion  The "Swing-door" STSG is a useful alternative for treating hand skin defects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捐赠场地的“旋转门”重建;一种可供选择的手部分层植皮方法
目的:手部皮肤缺损是常见的损伤,自体植皮是理想的治疗方法。然而,并发症可能发生在供体和受体部位。本研究将“摆动门”技术与传统植皮术进行了比较。患者和方法:2019年8月至2023年2月,19例手部皮肤缺损患者接受了“摆动门”STSG技术。上皮薄层升高,近端附着。皮下移植皮肤。供体部位用类似“摆动门”的上皮瓣封闭。根据愈合时间、疤痕形成以及供体和受体部位的疼痛来评估结果。结果:“摆动门”组移植物接受率较低,但并发症在两组之间没有显著差异。根据视觉模拟量表的测量,“摆动门”技术可带来更好的美容效果,如较低的温哥华疤痕量表评分、更快的供区上皮化以及减少术后早期的疼痛和不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
131
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Minilifting: Short-Scar Rhytidectomy with Thread Lifting. The Old and the New-An Ellege. Distally Based Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach-A Modification of the Classic Approach. Safety and Effectiveness of Liposuction Modalities in Managing Lipedema: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. "Funducation"-The New Age of Learning, Intersection of Education, and Fun.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1