Digital sovereignty–European Union's action plan needs a common understanding to succeed

IF 0.5 Q1 HISTORY History Compass Pub Date : 2021-11-16 DOI:10.1111/hic3.12698
Martin Kaloudis
{"title":"Digital sovereignty–European Union's action plan needs a common understanding to succeed","authors":"Martin Kaloudis","doi":"10.1111/hic3.12698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the states of the European Union (EU), the question currently raised is to what extent dependence on technologies from the USA and China will have a lasting impact on state sovereignty. The concept of digital sovereignty represents the EU's efforts to compensate for the deficits of the past decades caused by an inadequate positioning of Europe as a location for software and hardware development. Autocratic states use the path of digital autarky, the USA a path of liberalisation and high degrees of openness. In the EU, on the other hand, regulation, data protection and liberal values developed over centuries play a major role in the less pronounced IT development. The path of European states to more digital sovereignty has been addressed politically as an “action plan”, but there is still no common understanding or definition of what digital sovereignty exactly means, where the EU and thus also an individual European state stands. There is a lack of a target and a measurable index as well as evaluated measures derived from it. The present article articulates the basis, namely the common understanding and the definition of digital sovereignty. It places the concepts of digitalisation and state sovereignty in a historical framework and locates them in the current literature, then analyses digital sovereignty as a composite term and places it in the context of current research. Finally, a definition is proposed that can serve as the basis for further research to identify an index of digital sovereignty. This definition can also become the basis for EU legislation to implement the “action plan”.</p>","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"19 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hic3.12698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the states of the European Union (EU), the question currently raised is to what extent dependence on technologies from the USA and China will have a lasting impact on state sovereignty. The concept of digital sovereignty represents the EU's efforts to compensate for the deficits of the past decades caused by an inadequate positioning of Europe as a location for software and hardware development. Autocratic states use the path of digital autarky, the USA a path of liberalisation and high degrees of openness. In the EU, on the other hand, regulation, data protection and liberal values developed over centuries play a major role in the less pronounced IT development. The path of European states to more digital sovereignty has been addressed politically as an “action plan”, but there is still no common understanding or definition of what digital sovereignty exactly means, where the EU and thus also an individual European state stands. There is a lack of a target and a measurable index as well as evaluated measures derived from it. The present article articulates the basis, namely the common understanding and the definition of digital sovereignty. It places the concepts of digitalisation and state sovereignty in a historical framework and locates them in the current literature, then analyses digital sovereignty as a composite term and places it in the context of current research. Finally, a definition is proposed that can serve as the basis for further research to identify an index of digital sovereignty. This definition can also become the basis for EU legislation to implement the “action plan”.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字主权——欧盟的行动计划需要达成共识才能成功
在欧盟国家,目前提出的问题是,对美国和中国技术的依赖将在多大程度上对国家主权产生持久影响。数字主权的概念代表了欧盟为弥补过去几十年由于不充分地将欧洲定位为软件和硬件开发地点而造成的赤字所做的努力。专制国家走的是数字自给自足的道路,而美国走的是自由化和高度开放的道路。另一方面,在欧盟,几个世纪以来形成的监管、数据保护和自由价值观在不那么明显的IT发展中发挥了重要作用。欧洲国家获得更多数字主权的道路在政治上被称为“行动计划”,但对于数字主权的确切含义,欧盟以及单个欧洲国家的立场,仍然没有共同的理解或定义。缺乏目标和可衡量的指标,以及由此得出的评估措施。本文阐述了其基础,即对数字主权的共识和定义。它将数字化和国家主权的概念置于历史框架中,并将其置于当前文献中,然后将数字主权作为一个复合术语进行分析,并将其置于当前研究的背景下。最后,提出了一个定义,可以作为进一步研究确定数字主权指数的基础。这一定义也可以成为欧盟立法实施“行动计划”的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History Compass
History Compass HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A Landscape of Toleration: Central Europe in the Early Modern Era A Railway Carpenter in the History of Technology?: New Opportunities From Modern South Asia Issue Information ‘Temples Devoted to Cold Coffee and Hot Sex’: Coffee Bars and Youth Culture in Postwar Britain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1